DFNMvsFTPAETF Comparison
Dimensional National Municipal Bond ETF (DFNM) and Franklin Pennsylvania Municipal Income ETF (FTPA) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. Both ETFs have the same top 1 sector exposures: Municipal. DFNM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.18%, versus 0.35% for FTPA. DFNM is down -1% year-to-date (YTD) with +$360M in YTD flows. FTPA performs worse with -4.51% YTD performance, and +$48M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DFNM and FTPA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
DFNM vs FTPA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DFNM FTPA | +0.02%-1.10% | -2.31%-5.56% | -1.00%-4.51% | -0.15%n/a | +9.22%n/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | DFNM FTPA | -$35M+$14M | +$41M+$28M | +$360M+$48M | +$562M- | +$1.29B- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | DFNM FTPA | +3.59%+6.17% | +2.20%n/a | +2.31%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | DFNM FTPA | -4.26%-7.63% | -4.56%n/a | -4.56%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | DFNM FTPA | 92d92d | 101dn/a | 101dn/a | n/an/a |
DFNM | FTPA | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $46.71 | |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $46.71 | |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
DFNM | FTPA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $46.71 | – |
| 1D performance | +0.00% | – |
| AuM | $2.22 B | $122.78 M |
| E/R | 0.18% | 0.35% |
DFNM | FTPA | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Dimensional | Franklin Templeton |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 259 | 28 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 15, 2021 | November 10, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
