DFAWvsACWVETF Comparison
VS
Dimensional World Equity ETF (DFAW) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) belong to the same industry segment: Global Blended Cap. DFAW's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. In contrast, ACWV's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. DFAW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.24%, versus 0.2% for ACWV. DFAW is up 14.42% year-to-date (YTD) with +$513M in YTD flows. ACWV performs worse with 5.35% YTD performance, and -$131M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DFAW and ACWV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
DFAW vs ACWV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/23/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DFAW ACWV | -1.17%-2.72% | +2.90%+3.71% | +14.42%+5.35% | +18.81%+5.94% | +76.55%+36.93% | n/a+31.45% |
| Flows | DFAW ACWV | +$27M- | +$233M-$25M | +$513M-$131M | +$606M-$97M | +$1.32B-$2.20B | --$2.51B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | DFAW ACWV | +10.00%+7.56% | +12.82%+7.24% | +14.16%+8.26% | n/a+9.65% |
| Max drawdown | DFAW ACWV | -3.24%-3.32% | -8.89%-6.22% | -16.84%-7.33% | n/a-18.17% |
| Max drawdown duration | DFAW ACWV | 41d21d | 49d148d | 107d27d | n/a784d |
Trading data
DFAW | ACWV | |
Last sale 9/25/2026 at 6:27 PM | $84.06 | $124.17 |
| Previous close 09/24/2026 | $83.65 | $123.97 |
| Consolidated volume 09/24/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
DFAW
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexDFAW | ACWV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Main metrics
Last update 9/25/2026 at 6:27 PM
Live
Closed
DFAW | ACWV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $84.06 | $124.17 |
| 1D performance | +0.49% | +0.16% |
| AuM | $1.67 B | $3.31 B |
| E/R | 0.24% | 0.2% |
Characteristics
DFAW | ACWV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Dimensional | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index |
| N° of holdings | 13403 | 378 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 26, 2023 | October 18, 2011 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
DFAW
USA
70.1%
Other
29.9%
ACWV
USA
55.97%
Japan
9.99%
Other
34.03%
Sectors
DFAW
Technology
28.05%
Finance
19%
Industrials
11.42%
Healthcare
8.58%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.56%
Other
24.39%
ACWV
Technology
23.72%
Finance
14.27%
Healthcare
13.81%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.74%
Telecommunication.
9.99%
Utilities
7.16%
Other
20.31%
Advertisement
Diversification
DFAW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
22.25%
ACWV
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
16.78%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
DFAW
NVIDIA Corp.
3.81%
Apple, Inc.
3.74%
Microsoft Corp.
3.10%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.25%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.28%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.26%
Broadcom Inc.
0.93%
Alphabet, Inc.
0.88%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
0.87%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
0.83%
Micron Technology, Inc.
0.76%
Eli Lilly & Co.
0.76%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
0.61%
Johnson & Johnson
0.59%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
0.58%
ACWV
Johnson & Johnson
1.56%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.43%
Duke Energy Corp.
1.21%
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
1.20%
Microsoft Corp.
1.17%
Cencora, Inc.
1.13%
KDDI Corp.
1.10%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.10%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.08%
The Southern Co.
1.08%
Waste Management, Inc.
1.02%
Chubb Ltd.
0.98%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
0.94%
McKesson Corp.
0.89%
Novartis AG
0.89%
Frequently asked questions about DFAW and ACWV
How have the DFAW and ACWV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 23, 2026, DFAW is up 14.42% year-to-date (YTD), while ACWV has returned 5.35%. That puts DFAW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: DFAW or ACWV?
Year-to-date, the DFAW ETF saw +$513M in flows, compared to -$131M for ACWV.
Which ETF is more volatile: DFAW or ACWV?
Over the past year, DFAW had a volatility of 12.82%, while ACWV experienced 7.24%.
Which ETF is bigger: DFAW or ACWV?
As of September 23, 2026, DFAW holds $1.67 B in assets under management (AUM), while ACWV manages $3.31 B.
What sectors do the DFAW and ACWV ETFs invest in?
DFAW leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, ACWV focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the DFAW ETF and ACWV ETF?
DFAW top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp.. ACWV holds in its top three: Johnson & Johnson, Cisco Systems, Inc. and Duke Energy Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: DFAW or ACWV?
DFAW holds 13787 securities with 22.25% of its assets in the top 15. ACWV has 379 securities and a top 15 weight of 16.78%.
Advertisement
