DFAUvsIWBETF Comparison
VS
Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) belongs to the US All Cap segment. iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) is part of the US Large Cap segment. DFAU's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. In contrast, IWB's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. DFAU is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.12%, versus 0.15% for IWB. DFAU is up 12.39% year-to-date (YTD) with +$1.14B in YTD flows. IWB performs better with 12.44% YTD performance, and -$2.57B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DFAU and IWB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
DFAU vs IWB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/10/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DFAU IWB | -2.14%-0.99% | +4.73%+3.70% | +12.39%+12.44% | +17.78%+16.66% | +72.97%+75.47% | +78.56%+77.12% |
| Flows | DFAU IWB | +$183M-$167M | +$427M-$444M | +$1.14B-$2.57B | +$1.86B-$2.05B | +$4.72B-$2.56B | +$7.37B-$2.46B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | DFAU IWB | +11.62%+11.86% | +12.84%+13.00% | +15.25%+15.23% | +17.51%+17.35% |
| Max drawdown | DFAU IWB | -2.92%-3.34% | -8.70%-8.86% | -19.41%-19.16% | -23.66%-25.17% |
| Max drawdown duration | DFAU IWB | 19d19d | 63d76d | 127d126d | 707d709d |
Trading data
DFAU | IWB | |
Last sale 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $52.78 | $417.91 |
| Previous close 09/10/2026 | $52.37 | $414.32 |
| Consolidated volume 09/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
DFAU
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexDFAU | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/11/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
DFAU | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $52.78 | $417.91 |
| 1D performance | +0.78% | +0.87% |
| AuM | $12.73 B | $48.92 B |
| E/R | 0.12% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
DFAU | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Dimensional | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | Russell 1000 Index |
| N° of holdings | 2162 | 1011 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 17, 2020 | May 15, 2000 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
DFAU
USA
97%
Other
3%
IWB
USA
97.59%
Other
2.41%
Sectors
DFAU
Technology
40.44%
Finance
13.54%
Industrials
9.19%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.11%
Healthcare
9.06%
Other
18.66%
IWB
Technology
42.37%
Finance
14.69%
Healthcare
9.22%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.65%
Industrials
8.55%
Other
16.51%
Advertisement
Diversification
DFAU
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
38.81%
IWB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
40.24%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
DFAU
NVIDIA Corp.
6.74%
Apple, Inc.
6.45%
Microsoft Corp.
5.09%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.59%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.74%
Broadcom Inc.
2.35%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.28%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.75%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.39%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.28%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.24%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.11%
Tesla, Inc.
1.08%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
0.88%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
0.86%
IWB
Apple, Inc.
7.01%
NVIDIA Corp.
6.62%
Microsoft Corp.
4.88%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.32%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.83%
Broadcom Inc.
2.62%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.31%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.72%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.43%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.38%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.36%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.34%
Tesla, Inc.
1.31%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.15%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
0.95%
Frequently asked questions about DFAU and IWB
How have the DFAU and IWB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 10, 2026, DFAU is up 12.39% year-to-date (YTD), while IWB has returned 12.44%. That puts IWB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: DFAU or IWB?
Year-to-date, the DFAU ETF saw +$1.14B in flows, compared to -$2.57B for IWB.
Which ETF is more volatile: DFAU or IWB?
Over the past year, DFAU had a volatility of 12.84%, while IWB experienced 13%.
Which ETF is bigger: DFAU or IWB?
As of September 10, 2026, DFAU holds $12.73 B in assets under management (AUM), while IWB manages $48.92 B.
What sectors do the DFAU and IWB ETFs invest in?
DFAU leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, IWB focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the DFAU ETF and IWB ETF?
DFAU top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp.. IWB holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: DFAU or IWB?
DFAU holds 2196 securities with 38.81% of its assets in the top 15. IWB has 1023 securities and a top 15 weight of 40.24%.
Advertisement
Latest news about DFAU & IWB
Advertisement
Advertisement
