Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
DFAUvsDFUSETF Comparison
Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) belongs to the US All Cap segment. Dimensional US Equity ETF (DFUS) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. DFAU is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.12%, versus 0.09% for DFUS. DFAU is down -0.26% year-to-date (YTD) with +$269M in YTD flows. DFUS performs worse with -0.77% YTD performance, and +$810M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DFAU and DFUS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
DFAU vs DFUS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DFAU DFUS | -2.75%-2.52% | -1.33%-1.76% | -0.26%-0.77% | +23.38%+23.52% | +77.57%+81.53% | +75.82%n/a |
| Flows | DFAU DFUS | +$157M+$744M | +$363M+$888M | +$269M+$810M | +$1.86B+$2.51B | +$4.48B+$7.55B | +$7.07B- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | DFAU DFUS | +11.90%+12.12% | +18.53%+18.63% | +15.22%+15.31% | +17.44%n/a |
| Max drawdown | DFAU DFUS | -3.45%-3.52% | -14.12%-14.06% | -19.41%-19.45% | -23.66%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | DFAU DFUS | 30d43d | 45d45d | 127d127d | 707dn/a |
DFAU | DFUS | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 5:49 PM | $45.69 | $72.05 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $45.92 | $72.39 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
DFAU | DFUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $45.69 | $72.05 |
| 1D performance | -0.50% | -0.47% |
| AuM | $10.54 B | $18.81 B |
| E/R | 0.12% | 0.09% |
DFAU | DFUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Dimensional | Dimensional |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 2059 | 2132 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 17, 2020 | June 14, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the DFAU and DFUS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, DFAU is down -0.26% year-to-date (YTD), while DFUS has lost -0.77%. That puts DFAU better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: DFAU or DFUS?
Year-to-date, the DFAU ETF saw +$269M in flows, compared to +$810M for DFUS.
Which ETF is more volatile: DFAU or DFUS?
Over the past year, DFAU had a volatility of 18.53%, while DFUS experienced 18.63%.
Which ETF is bigger: DFAU or DFUS?
As of March 11, 2026, DFAU holds $10.54 B in assets under management (AUM), while DFUS manages $18.81 B.
What sectors do the DFAU and DFUS ETFs invest in?
DFAU leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, DFUS focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the DFAU ETF and DFUS ETF?
DFAU top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. DFUS holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: DFAU or DFUS?
DFAU holds 2124 securities with 38.09% of its assets in the top 15. DFUS has 2202 securities and a top 15 weight of 40.29%.
The Cheapest Active ETFs of 2025
Bridging the Gap: Unpacking the Divergence Between Chinese and US Markets
Dimensional Fund Advisors Celebrates 3-Year ETF Anniversary
The Cheapest NYSE Listed Actively Managed Equity and Fixed Income ETFs of 2023
Active ETFs See Strong Interest with Managers like Dimensional Fund Advisors Leading the Way
Active ETFs See Strong Interest with Managers like Dimensional Fund Advisors Leading the Way
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
