Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
DEUSvsSMOTETF Comparison
Xtrackers Russell US Multifactor ETF (DEUS) and VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF (SMOT) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. DEUS's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. In contrast, SMOT's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. DEUS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.17%, versus 0.5% for SMOT. DEUS is up 4.51% year-to-date (YTD) with +$19M in YTD flows. SMOT performs worse with -1.78% YTD performance, and -$19M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DEUS and SMOT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
DEUS vs SMOT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DEUS SMOT | -3.22%-4.58% | +3.21%-3.16% | +4.51%-1.78% | +17.03%+8.84% | +53.73%+35.42% | +59.73%n/a |
| Flows | DEUS SMOT | +$25M-$6M | +$19M-$18M | +$19M-$19M | +$28M-$108M | +$23M+$238M | -$34M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | DEUS SMOT | +10.49%+13.09% | +15.20%+20.93% | +13.37%+17.76% | +15.46%n/a |
| Max drawdown | DEUS SMOT | -4.00%-5.80% | -11.14%-16.08% | -16.36%-23.35% | -20.72%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | DEUS SMOT | 9d48d | 37d46d | 238d380d | 713dn/a |
DEUS | SMOT | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 2:51 PM | $60.21 | $35.01 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $60.12 | $34.98 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
DEUS | SMOT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
DEUS | SMOT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $60.21 | $35.01 |
| 1D performance | +0.15% | +0.09% |
| AuM | $218.92 M | $333.44 M |
| E/R | 0.17% | 0.5% |
DEUS | SMOT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Xtrackers by DWS | VanEck |
| Benchmark | Russell 1000 Comprehensive Factor Index | Morningstar US Small-Mid Cap Moat Focus Index |
| N° of holdings | 917 | 102 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 24, 2015 | October 4, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the DEUS and SMOT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, DEUS is up 4.51% year-to-date (YTD), while SMOT has lost -1.78%. That puts DEUS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: DEUS or SMOT?
Year-to-date, the DEUS ETF saw +$19M in flows, compared to -$19M for SMOT.
Which ETF is more volatile: DEUS or SMOT?
Over the past year, DEUS had a volatility of 15.2%, while SMOT experienced 20.93%.
Which ETF is bigger: DEUS or SMOT?
As of March 11, 2026, DEUS holds $218.92 M in assets under management (AUM), while SMOT manages $333.44 M.
What sectors do the DEUS and SMOT ETFs invest in?
DEUS leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. Meanwhile, SMOT focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the DEUS ETF and SMOT ETF?
DEUS top holdings include MCKESSON, ALTRIA GROUP and DOLLAR GENERAL. SMOT holds in its top three: ALBEMARLE, HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES and SCHLUMBERGER.
Which ETF is more diversified: DEUS or SMOT?
DEUS holds 1014 securities with 9.35% of its assets in the top 15. SMOT has 106 securities and a top 15 weight of 23.88%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
