Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
DEMZvsACSIETF Comparison
The Democratic Large-Cap Core ETF (DEMZ) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. American Customer Satisfaction Core Alpha ETF - USD (ACSI) is part of the US All Cap segment. DEMZ's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. In contrast, ACSI's top sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Communication Services and Financials. DEMZ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.45%, versus 0.65% for ACSI. DEMZ is down -2.06% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3M in YTD flows. ACSI performs worse with -2.62% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DEMZ and ACSI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
DEMZ vs ACSI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DEMZ ACSI | -1.90%-2.12% | -2.65%-2.84% | -2.06%-2.62% | +24.08%+14.12% | +78.26%+59.65% | +83.21%+44.58% |
| Flows | DEMZ ACSI | +$1M- | +$6M- | +$3M- | +$8M+$13K | +$16M-$258K | +$37M-$3M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | DEMZ ACSI | +14.89%+10.72% | +19.36%+15.63% | +15.88%+13.69% | +18.17%+16.71% |
| Max drawdown | DEMZ ACSI | -6.36%-5.09% | -13.21%-10.46% | -19.10%-15.49% | -27.17%-24.94% |
| Max drawdown duration | DEMZ ACSI | 43d60d | 37d45d | 187d153d | 719d854d |
DEMZ | ACSI | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $40.71 | $64.88 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $40.93 | $65.16 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
DEMZ | ACSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
DEMZ | ACSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $40.71 | $64.88 |
| 1D performance | -0.53% | -0.42% |
| AuM | $55.35 M | $100.60 M |
| E/R | 0.45% | 0.65% |
DEMZ | ACSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Reflection Asset Management | Exponential ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | American Customer Satisfaction Investable Index |
| N° of holdings | 42 | 33 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 2, 2020 | November 1, 2016 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the DEMZ and ACSI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, DEMZ is down -2.06% year-to-date (YTD), while ACSI has lost -2.62%. That puts DEMZ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: DEMZ or ACSI?
Year-to-date, the DEMZ ETF saw +$3M in flows, compared to - for ACSI.
Which ETF is more volatile: DEMZ or ACSI?
Over the past year, DEMZ had a volatility of 19.36%, while ACSI experienced 15.63%.
Which ETF is bigger: DEMZ or ACSI?
As of March 11, 2026, DEMZ holds $55.35 M in assets under management (AUM), while ACSI manages $100.60 M.
What sectors do the DEMZ and ACSI ETFs invest in?
DEMZ leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. Meanwhile, ACSI focuses on Consumer Discretionary, Communication Services and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the DEMZ ETF and ACSI ETF?
DEMZ top holdings include US5128073062, NVIDIA and META PLATFORMS. ACSI holds in its top three: ALPHABET INC-CL, AMAZON.COM INC and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: DEMZ or ACSI?
DEMZ holds 44 securities with 56.04% of its assets in the top 15. ACSI has 33 securities and a top 15 weight of 57.43%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
