Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
DEEPvsRWJETF Comparison
Roundhill Acquirers Small and Micro Deep Value ETF
Roundhill Acquirers Small and Micro Deep Value ETF (DEEP) belongs to the US Small Cap Value segment. Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) is part of the US Small Cap segment. DEEP's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Industrials and Health Care. In contrast, RWJ's top sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Industrials and Financials. DEEP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.8%, versus 0.39% for RWJ. DEEP is up 2.44% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. RWJ performs better with 3.09% YTD performance, and +$23M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DEEP and RWJ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
DEEP vs RWJ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DEEP RWJ | -4.53%-7.45% | -0.95%-0.50% | +2.44%+3.09% | +19.09%+23.21% | +23.91%+44.01% | +13.11%+30.66% |
| Flows | DEEP RWJ | -+$10M | -+$29M | -+$23M | -$5M-$272M | -$17M+$52M | -$10M+$814M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | DEEP RWJ | +16.51%+18.31% | +23.00%+25.43% | +20.94%+22.64% | +21.96%+23.88% |
| Max drawdown | DEEP RWJ | -6.44%-8.39% | -16.19%-17.73% | -28.32%-29.24% | -28.32%-29.24% |
| Max drawdown duration | DEEP RWJ | 17d31d | 54d52d | 413d289d | 413d289d |
DEEP | RWJ | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.66 | $50.18 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $36.69 | $50.15 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
DEEP | RWJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
DEEP | RWJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.66 | $50.18 |
| 1D performance | -0.07% | +0.06% |
| AuM | $25.69 M | $1.63 B |
| E/R | 0.8% | 0.39% |
DEEP | RWJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Roundhill Investments | Invesco |
| Benchmark | The Acquirers Deep Value Index | S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue-Weighted Index |
| N° of holdings | 98 | 558 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 22, 2014 | February 22, 2008 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the DEEP and RWJ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, DEEP is up 2.44% year-to-date (YTD), while RWJ has returned 3.09%. That puts RWJ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: DEEP or RWJ?
Year-to-date, the DEEP ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$23M for RWJ.
Which ETF is more volatile: DEEP or RWJ?
Over the past year, DEEP had a volatility of 23%, while RWJ experienced 25.43%.
Which ETF is bigger: DEEP or RWJ?
As of March 11, 2026, DEEP holds $25.69 M in assets under management (AUM), while RWJ manages $1.63 B.
What sectors do the DEEP and RWJ ETFs invest in?
DEEP leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary, Industrials and Health Care. Meanwhile, RWJ focuses on Consumer Discretionary, Industrials and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the DEEP ETF and RWJ ETF?
DEEP top holdings include IRONWOOD PHARMA, VAALCO ENERGY and ORGANON & CO. RWJ holds in its top three: WORLD FUEL SERVICES, UNITED NATURAL FOODS and CARMAX.
Which ETF is more diversified: DEEP or RWJ?
DEEP holds 100 securities with 17.69% of its assets in the top 15. RWJ has 601 securities and a top 15 weight of 19.95%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
