DEEPvsQVMSETF Comparison
ETF 1
DEEP
Roundhill Acquirers Small and Micro Deep Value ETF
This fund is part of
US Small Cap Value
-0.68%
VS
Roundhill Acquirers Small and Micro Deep Value ETF (DEEP) belongs to the US Small Cap Value segment. Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMS) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. DEEP's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Cyclicals, Industrials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, QVMS's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Technology. DEEP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.8%, versus 0.15% for QVMS. DEEP is up 20.25% year-to-date (YTD) with -$2M in YTD flows. QVMS performs better with 21.6% YTD performance, and -$662K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DEEP and QVMS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
DEEP vs QVMS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/20/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DEEP QVMS | +2.90%+0.69% | +6.01%+7.00% | +20.25%+21.60% | +30.23%+31.71% | +30.84%+49.26% | +39.47%+53.50% |
| Flows | DEEP QVMS | -+$346K | -+$45K | -$2M-$662K | -$5M-$801K | -$17M-$34M | -$22M+$109M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | DEEP QVMS | +16.67%+15.82% | +18.96%+17.45% | +20.38%+20.13% | +21.68%+20.98% |
| Max drawdown | DEEP QVMS | -6.54%-4.06% | -11.90%-8.69% | -28.32%-27.75% | -28.32%-27.75% |
| Max drawdown duration | DEEP QVMS | 22d16d | 111d59d | 413d380d | 413d380d |
Trading data
DEEP | QVMS | |
Last sale 7/20/2026 at 7:57 PM | $42.59 | $34.29 |
| Previous close 07/20/2026 | $42.61 | $34.13 |
| Consolidated volume 07/20/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
DEEP | QVMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/20/2026 at 7:57 PM
Live
Closed
DEEP | QVMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $42.59 | $34.29 |
| 1D performance | -0.05% | +0.48% |
| AuM | $27.68 M | $249.88 M |
| E/R | 0.8% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
DEEP | QVMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Roundhill Investments | Invesco |
| Benchmark | The Acquirers Deep Value Index | S&P SmallCap 600 Quality, Value & Momentum Top 90% Multi-factor Index |
| N° of holdings | 99 | 539 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 22, 2014 | June 30, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Exposure
Countries
DEEP
USA
79.96%
Other
20.04%
QVMS
USA
97.55%
Other
2.45%
Sectors
DEEP
Consumer Cyclical.
13.04%
Industrials
11.89%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
11.58%
Finance
11.38%
Energy
9.94%
Consumer Services
9.92%
Other
32.25%
QVMS
Finance
25.4%
Industrials
13.86%
Technology
13.29%
Healthcare
11.67%
Consumer Cyclical.
8.69%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.19%
Other
19.89%
Advertisement
Diversification
DEEP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
16.72%
QVMS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
8.84%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
DEEP
BellRing Brands, Inc.
1.17%
PROG Holdings, Inc.
1.16%
World Acceptance Corp.
1.15%
Wabash National Corp.
1.15%
Apogee Enterprises, Inc.
1.14%
Amphastar Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
1.12%
ODDITY Tech Ltd.
1.12%
OppFi, Inc.
1.10%
NRC Health
1.10%
John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc.
1.09%
Utah Medical Products, Inc.
1.09%
BlueLinx Holdings, Inc.
1.09%
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc.
1.08%
Kohl's Corp.
1.08%
Bloomin' Brands, Inc.
1.08%
QVMS
Argan, Inc.
0.73%
Element Solutions, Inc.
0.68%
ViaSat, Inc.
0.67%
FormFactor, Inc.
0.67%
Molina Healthcare, Inc.
0.63%
MaxLinear, Inc.
0.62%
Krystal Biotech, Inc.
0.58%
BrightSpring Health Services, Inc.
0.57%
Alkermes Plc
0.53%
Qorvo, Inc.
0.53%
StoneX Group, Inc.
0.53%
Everus Construction Group, Inc.
0.53%
Powell Industries, Inc.
0.53%
Eastman Chemical Co.
0.52%
MYR Group, Inc.
0.52%
Frequently asked questions about DEEP and QVMS
How have the DEEP and QVMS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 20, 2026, DEEP is up 20.25% year-to-date (YTD), while QVMS has returned 21.6%. That puts QVMS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: DEEP or QVMS?
Year-to-date, the DEEP ETF saw -$2M in flows, compared to -$662K for QVMS.
Which ETF is more volatile: DEEP or QVMS?
Over the past year, DEEP had a volatility of 18.96%, while QVMS experienced 17.45%.
Which ETF is bigger: DEEP or QVMS?
As of July 20, 2026, DEEP holds $27.68 M in assets under management (AUM), while QVMS manages $249.88 M.
What sectors do the DEEP and QVMS ETFs invest in?
DEEP leans toward sectors like Consumer Cyclicals, Industrials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, QVMS focuses on Finance, Industrials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the DEEP ETF and QVMS ETF?
DEEP top holdings include BellRing Brands, Inc., PROG Holdings, Inc. and World Acceptance Corp.. QVMS holds in its top three: Argan, Inc., Element Solutions, Inc. and ViaSat, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: DEEP or QVMS?
DEEP holds 99 securities with 16.72% of its assets in the top 15. QVMS has 539 securities and a top 15 weight of 8.84%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
