Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
DEEPvsOMFSETF Comparison
Roundhill Acquirers Small and Micro Deep Value ETF
Roundhill Acquirers Small and Micro Deep Value ETF (DEEP) belongs to the US Small Cap Value segment. Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. DEEP's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Industrials and Health Care. In contrast, OMFS's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. DEEP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.8%, versus 0.39% for OMFS. DEEP is up 2.44% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. OMFS performs better with 3.06% YTD performance, and -$16M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DEEP and OMFS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
DEEP vs OMFS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DEEP OMFS | -4.53%-5.33% | -0.95%-1.66% | +2.44%+3.06% | +19.09%+24.61% | +23.91%+40.20% | +13.11%+18.39% |
| Flows | DEEP OMFS | --$12M | --$13M | --$16M | -$5M-$25M | -$17M-$81M | -$10M+$143M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | DEEP OMFS | +16.51%+17.17% | +23.00%+21.17% | +20.94%+20.21% | +21.96%+21.39% |
| Max drawdown | DEEP OMFS | -6.44%-5.71% | -16.19%-12.36% | -28.32%-22.72% | -28.32%-29.04% |
| Max drawdown duration | DEEP OMFS | 17d30d | 54d35d | 413d284d | 413d1095d |
DEEP | OMFS | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $36.00 | $44.82 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $36.66 | $45.73 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
DEEP | OMFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
DEEP | OMFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $36.00 | $44.82 |
| 1D performance | -1.79% | -2.00% |
| AuM | $25.69 M | $252.87 M |
| E/R | 0.8% | 0.39% |
DEEP | OMFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Roundhill Investments | Invesco |
| Benchmark | The Acquirers Deep Value Index | Russell 2000 OFI Dynamic Multifactor Index |
| N° of holdings | 98 | 1461 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 22, 2014 | November 8, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the DEEP and OMFS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, DEEP is up 2.44% year-to-date (YTD), while OMFS has returned 3.06%. That puts OMFS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: DEEP or OMFS?
Year-to-date, the DEEP ETF saw - in flows, compared to -$16M for OMFS.
Which ETF is more volatile: DEEP or OMFS?
Over the past year, DEEP had a volatility of 23%, while OMFS experienced 21.17%.
Which ETF is bigger: DEEP or OMFS?
As of March 11, 2026, DEEP holds $25.69 M in assets under management (AUM), while OMFS manages $252.87 M.
What sectors do the DEEP and OMFS ETFs invest in?
DEEP leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary, Industrials and Health Care. Meanwhile, OMFS focuses on Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the DEEP ETF and OMFS ETF?
DEEP top holdings include IRONWOOD PHARMA, VAALCO ENERGY and ORGANON & CO. OMFS holds in its top three: COMPASS, DANA INC and CONSTELLIUM HOLDCO BV.
Which ETF is more diversified: DEEP or OMFS?
DEEP holds 100 securities with 17.69% of its assets in the top 15. OMFS has 1683 securities and a top 15 weight of 4.24%.
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.