DEEPvsFLQSETF Comparison
ETF 1
DEEP
Roundhill Acquirers Small and Micro Deep Value ETF
This fund is part of
US Small Cap Value
-0.62%
VS
Roundhill Acquirers Small and Micro Deep Value ETF (DEEP) belongs to the US Small Cap Value segment. Franklin U.S. Small Cap Multifactor Index ETF (FLQS) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. DEEP's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Cyclicals, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Industrials. In contrast, FLQS's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Industrials. DEEP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.8%, versus 0.35% for FLQS. DEEP is up 20.38% year-to-date (YTD) with -$2M in YTD flows. FLQS performs worse with 15.85% YTD performance, and -$25M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DEEP and FLQS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
DEEP vs FLQS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DEEP FLQS | +4.25%+6.83% | +7.09%+8.05% | +20.38%+15.85% | +29.07%+21.09% | +33.49%+42.94% | +43.11%+45.63% |
| Flows | DEEP FLQS | --$32K | --$2M | -$2M-$25M | -$5M-$7M | -$17M+$15M | -$22M+$19M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | DEEP FLQS | +16.74%+12.98% | +18.97%+15.17% | +20.38%+17.87% | +21.71%+19.24% |
| Max drawdown | DEEP FLQS | -6.54%-3.92% | -11.90%-9.09% | -28.32%-22.82% | -28.32%-28.18% |
| Max drawdown duration | DEEP FLQS | 22d49d | 111d112d | 413d415d | 413d862d |
Trading data
DEEP | FLQS | |
Last sale 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $42.61 | $49.63 |
| Previous close 07/16/2026 | $43.24 | $49.93 |
| Consolidated volume 07/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
DEEP | FLQS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
DEEP | FLQS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $42.61 | $49.63 |
| 1D performance | -1.45% | -0.61% |
| AuM | $27.71 M | $52.14 M |
| E/R | 0.8% | 0.35% |
Characteristics
DEEP | FLQS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Roundhill Investments | Franklin Templeton |
| Benchmark | The Acquirers Deep Value Index | LibertyQ US Small Cap Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 98 | 468 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 22, 2014 | April 26, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
DEEP
USA
80.22%
Other
19.78%
FLQS
USA
94.72%
Other
5.28%
Sectors
DEEP
Consumer Cyclical.
16.96%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
12.2%
Industrials
11.6%
Finance
10.22%
Energy
8.27%
Consumer Services
8.21%
Other
32.54%
FLQS
Finance
21.33%
Technology
16.44%
Industrials
12.47%
Healthcare
10.22%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.97%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.04%
Other
20.53%
Advertisement
Diversification
DEEP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
20.55%
FLQS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
15.61%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of May 31, 2026
DEEP
Axcelis Technologies, Inc.
1.71%
Franklin Covey Co.
1.70%
Helen of Troy Ltd.
1.58%
Open Lending Corp.
1.49%
Kforce, Inc.
1.39%
Atkore, Inc.
1.35%
AMN Healthcare Services, Inc.
1.32%
Photronics, Inc.
1.32%
NVE Corp.
1.31%
Acadian Asset Management, Inc.
1.30%
WisdomTree, Inc.
1.27%
AMC Global Media, Inc.
1.25%
Visteon Corp.
1.21%
Steven Madden Ltd.
1.18%
Bloomin' Brands, Inc.
1.17%
FLQS
Rambus, Inc.
1.50%
Viavi Solutions, Inc.
1.44%
Moog, Inc.
1.33%
FirstCash Holdings, Inc.
1.20%
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
1.10%
ESCO Technologies, Inc.
1.10%
CareTrust REIT, Inc.
1.07%
Jackson Financial, Inc.
1.01%
Alkermes Plc
0.93%
Essent Group Ltd.
0.92%
Sanmina Corp.
0.86%
TXNM Energy, Inc.
0.83%
Primoris Services Corp.
0.78%
Clear Secure, Inc.
0.77%
Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc.
0.77%
Frequently asked questions about DEEP and FLQS
How have the DEEP and FLQS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 17, 2026, DEEP is up 20.38% year-to-date (YTD), while FLQS has returned 15.85%. That puts DEEP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: DEEP or FLQS?
Year-to-date, the DEEP ETF saw -$2M in flows, compared to -$25M for FLQS.
Which ETF is more volatile: DEEP or FLQS?
Over the past year, DEEP had a volatility of 18.97%, while FLQS experienced 15.17%.
Which ETF is bigger: DEEP or FLQS?
As of July 17, 2026, DEEP holds $27.71 M in assets under management (AUM), while FLQS manages $52.14 M.
What sectors do the DEEP and FLQS ETFs invest in?
DEEP leans toward sectors like Consumer Cyclicals, Consumer Non-Cyclicals and Industrials. Meanwhile, FLQS focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the DEEP ETF and FLQS ETF?
DEEP top holdings include Axcelis Technologies, Inc., Franklin Covey Co. and Helen of Troy Ltd.. FLQS holds in its top three: Rambus, Inc., Viavi Solutions, Inc. and Moog, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: DEEP or FLQS?
DEEP holds 98 securities with 20.55% of its assets in the top 15. FLQS has 471 securities and a top 15 weight of 15.61%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
