Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
DBJPvsJPXNETF Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) and iShares JPX-Nikkei 400 ETF (JPXN) belong to the same industry segment: Japan Blended Cap. DBJP's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, JPXN's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. DBJP is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.45%, versus 0.48% for JPXN. DBJP is up 7.81% year-to-date (YTD) with +$120M in YTD flows. JPXN performs better with 8.11% YTD performance, and +$101M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DBJP and JPXN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
DBJP vs JPXN performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DBJP JPXN | -5.33%-6.06% | +8.61%+7.43% | +7.81%+8.11% | +42.40%+31.82% | +116.81%+65.96% | +143.93%+44.69% |
| Flows | DBJP JPXN | +$27M+$74M | +$120M+$101M | +$120M+$101M | +$64M+$101M | +$104M+$122M | +$137M+$105M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | DBJP JPXN | +23.04%+20.27% | +23.16%+19.88% | +21.48%+17.66% | +19.61%+17.56% |
| Max drawdown | DBJP JPXN | -9.16%-8.97% | -18.53%-13.96% | -25.81%-15.27% | -25.81%-33.31% |
| Max drawdown duration | DBJP JPXN | 9d27d | 63d37d | 350d225d | 350d903d |
DBJP | JPXN | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $102.39 | $92.51 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $102.78 | $93.24 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
DBJP | JPXN | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
DBJP | JPXN | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $102.39 | $92.51 |
| 1D performance | -0.38% | -0.78% |
| AuM | $590.26 M | $210.22 M |
| E/R | 0.45% | 0.48% |
DBJP | JPXN | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Xtrackers by DWS | iShares |
| Benchmark | MSCI Japan Index | JPX-Nikkei 400 Index |
| N° of holdings | 179 | 390 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 8, 2011 | October 23, 2001 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the DBJP and JPXN ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, DBJP is up 7.81% year-to-date (YTD), while JPXN has returned 8.11%. That puts JPXN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: DBJP or JPXN?
Year-to-date, the DBJP ETF saw +$120M in flows, compared to +$101M for JPXN.
Which ETF is more volatile: DBJP or JPXN?
Over the past year, DBJP had a volatility of 23.16%, while JPXN experienced 19.88%.
Which ETF is bigger: DBJP or JPXN?
As of March 10, 2026, DBJP holds $590.26 M in assets under management (AUM), while JPXN manages $210.22 M.
What sectors do the DBJP and JPXN ETFs invest in?
DBJP leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, JPXN focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the DBJP ETF and JPXN ETF?
DBJP top holdings include TOYOTA, MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP and HITACHI. JPXN holds in its top three: ADVANTEST, MIZUHO FINANCIAL and MITSUI.
Which ETF is more diversified: DBJP or JPXN?
DBJP holds 182 securities with 36.31% of its assets in the top 15. JPXN has 392 securities and a top 15 weight of 26.08%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
