DBJPvsGSJYETF Comparison
VS
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) belong to the same industry segment: Japan Blended Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Industrials. DBJP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.45%, versus 0.25% for GSJY. DBJP is up 20.59% year-to-date (YTD) with +$177M in YTD flows. GSJY performs worse with 17.03% YTD performance, and +$21M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DBJP and GSJY below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
DBJP vs GSJY performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/23/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DBJP GSJY | -2.55%-1.57% | -1.74%+2.74% | +20.59%+17.03% | +27.05%+20.53% | +108.41%+77.03% | +157.86%+58.63% |
| Flows | DBJP GSJY | +$12M- | +$23M+$11M | +$177M+$21M | +$163M+$21M | +$164M+$60M | +$201M+$60M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | DBJP GSJY | +17.70%+18.03% | +21.38%+21.85% | +22.65%+22.56% | +20.30%+20.94% |
| Max drawdown | DBJP GSJY | -6.05%-5.10% | -11.18%-14.04% | -25.81%-18.92% | -25.81%-28.82% |
| Max drawdown duration | DBJP GSJY | 17d17d | 71d173d | 350d235d | 350d817d |
Trading data
DBJP | GSJY | |
Last sale 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM | $112.13 | $53.93 |
| Previous close 10/22/2026 | $112.96 | $54.21 |
| Consolidated volume 10/22/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
DBJP | GSJY | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
DBJP | GSJY | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $112.13 | $53.93 |
| 1D performance | -0.73% | -0.50% |
| AuM | $708.65 M | $97.06 M |
| E/R | 0.45% | 0.25% |
Characteristics
DBJP | GSJY | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Xtrackers by DWS | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | MSCI Japan Index | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 168 | 154 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 8, 2011 | March 2, 2016 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
DBJP
Japan
98.38%
Other
1.62%
GSJY
Japan
99.83%
Other
0.17%
Sectors
DBJP
Technology
24.06%
Finance
20.68%
Industrials
18.49%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.46%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.24%
Other
20.08%
GSJY
Technology
22.62%
Finance
21.18%
Industrials
18.97%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.58%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.97%
Other
19.68%
Advertisement
Diversification
DBJP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
38.18%
GSJY
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
36.22%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
DBJP
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
4.56%
Toyota Motor Corp.
3.44%
Advantest Corp.
3.01%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
2.94%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
2.93%
Hitachi Ltd.
2.86%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
2.75%
Sony Group Corp.
2.68%
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
2.34%
SoftBank Group Corp.
2.23%
KEYENCE Corp.
1.82%
Kioxia Holdings Corp.
1.75%
Mitsubishi Corp.
1.69%
Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc.
1.60%
Fast Retailing Co., Ltd.
1.58%
GSJY
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
4.38%
Advantest Corp.
3.86%
Toyota Motor Corp.
2.95%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
2.93%
Hitachi Ltd.
2.80%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
2.69%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
2.54%
Sony Group Corp.
2.45%
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
2.25%
Mitsubishi Corp.
1.80%
SoftBank Group Corp.
1.74%
Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc.
1.52%
ENEOS Holdings, Inc.
1.47%
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
1.44%
KEYENCE Corp.
1.39%
Frequently asked questions about DBJP and GSJY
How have the DBJP and GSJY ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 23, 2026, DBJP is up 20.59% year-to-date (YTD), while GSJY has returned 17.03%. That puts DBJP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: DBJP or GSJY?
Year-to-date, the DBJP ETF saw +$177M in flows, compared to +$21M for GSJY.
Which ETF is more volatile: DBJP or GSJY?
Over the past year, DBJP had a volatility of 21.38%, while GSJY experienced 21.85%.
Which ETF is bigger: DBJP or GSJY?
As of October 23, 2026, DBJP holds $708.65 M in assets under management (AUM), while GSJY manages $97.06 M.
What sectors do the DBJP and GSJY ETFs invest in?
DBJP leans toward sectors like Technology, Finance and Industrials. Meanwhile, GSJY focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the DBJP ETF and GSJY ETF?
DBJP top holdings include Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc., Toyota Motor Corp. and Advantest Corp.. GSJY holds in its top three: Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc., Advantest Corp. and Toyota Motor Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: DBJP or GSJY?
DBJP holds 168 securities with 38.18% of its assets in the top 15. GSJY has 154 securities and a top 15 weight of 36.22%.
Advertisement
Latest news about DBJP & GSJY
Advertisement
