Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
DBJPvsGSJYETF Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity ETF (GSJY) belong to the same industry segment: Japan Blended Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. DBJP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.45%, versus 0.25% for GSJY. DBJP is up 7.81% year-to-date (YTD) with +$120M in YTD flows. GSJY performs worse with 3.51% YTD performance, and +$10M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DBJP and GSJY below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
DBJP vs GSJY performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DBJP GSJY | -5.33%-7.69% | +8.61%+4.32% | +7.81%+3.51% | +42.40%+25.50% | +116.81%+58.87% | +143.93%+42.19% |
| Flows | DBJP GSJY | +$27M- | +$120M+$10M | +$120M+$10M | +$64M+$26M | +$104M+$49M | +$137M+$41M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | DBJP GSJY | +23.04%+23.58% | +23.16%+24.05% | +21.48%+21.40% | +19.61%+20.20% |
| Max drawdown | DBJP GSJY | -9.16%-11.62% | -18.53%-17.99% | -25.81%-18.92% | -25.81%-33.01% |
| Max drawdown duration | DBJP GSJY | 9d25d | 63d46d | 350d235d | 350d903d |
DBJP | GSJY | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $102.39 | $49.25 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $102.78 | $49.68 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
DBJP | GSJY | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
DBJP | GSJY | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $102.39 | $49.25 |
| 1D performance | -0.38% | -0.87% |
| AuM | $590.26 M | $76.91 M |
| E/R | 0.45% | 0.25% |
DBJP | GSJY | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Xtrackers by DWS | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | MSCI Japan Index | Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Japan Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 179 | 168 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 8, 2011 | March 2, 2016 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the DBJP and GSJY ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, DBJP is up 7.81% year-to-date (YTD), while GSJY has returned 3.51%. That puts DBJP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: DBJP or GSJY?
Year-to-date, the DBJP ETF saw +$120M in flows, compared to +$10M for GSJY.
Which ETF is more volatile: DBJP or GSJY?
Over the past year, DBJP had a volatility of 23.16%, while GSJY experienced 24.05%.
Which ETF is bigger: DBJP or GSJY?
As of March 10, 2026, DBJP holds $590.26 M in assets under management (AUM), while GSJY manages $76.91 M.
What sectors do the DBJP and GSJY ETFs invest in?
DBJP leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, GSJY focuses on Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the DBJP ETF and GSJY ETF?
DBJP top holdings include TOYOTA, MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP and HITACHI. GSJY holds in its top three: TOYOTA, MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP and HITACHI.
Which ETF is more diversified: DBJP or GSJY?
DBJP holds 182 securities with 36.31% of its assets in the top 15. GSJY has 168 securities and a top 15 weight of 34.32%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
