Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
DBJPvsEWJVETF Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) and iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF (EWJV) belong to the same industry segment: Japan Blended Cap. DBJP's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, EWJV's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. DBJP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.45%, versus 0.15% for EWJV. DBJP is up 7.81% year-to-date (YTD) with +$120M in YTD flows. EWJV performs worse with 7.79% YTD performance, and +$192M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DBJP and EWJV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
DBJP vs EWJV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DBJP EWJV | -5.33%-9.33% | +8.61%+8.13% | +7.81%+7.79% | +42.40%+36.92% | +116.81%+92.19% | +143.93%+82.38% |
| Flows | DBJP EWJV | +$27M+$102M | +$120M+$199M | +$120M+$192M | +$64M+$362M | +$104M+$312M | +$137M+$546M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | DBJP EWJV | +23.04%+19.38% | +23.16%+20.20% | +21.48%+17.92% | +19.61%+17.17% |
| Max drawdown | DBJP EWJV | -9.16%-10.83% | -18.53%-14.98% | -25.81%-14.98% | -25.81%-24.96% |
| Max drawdown duration | DBJP EWJV | 9d23d | 63d47d | 350d47d | 350d670d |
DBJP | EWJV | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 7:59 PM | $102.39 | $41.83 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $102.78 | $42.67 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
DBJP | EWJV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
DBJP | EWJV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $102.39 | $41.83 |
| 1D performance | -0.38% | -1.97% |
| AuM | $590.26 M | $720.72 M |
| E/R | 0.45% | 0.15% |
DBJP | EWJV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Xtrackers by DWS | iShares |
| Benchmark | MSCI Japan Index | MSCI Japan Value Index |
| N° of holdings | 179 | 107 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 8, 2011 | March 5, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the DBJP and EWJV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, DBJP is up 7.81% year-to-date (YTD), while EWJV has returned 7.79%. That puts DBJP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: DBJP or EWJV?
Year-to-date, the DBJP ETF saw +$120M in flows, compared to +$192M for EWJV.
Which ETF is more volatile: DBJP or EWJV?
Over the past year, DBJP had a volatility of 23.16%, while EWJV experienced 20.2%.
Which ETF is bigger: DBJP or EWJV?
As of March 10, 2026, DBJP holds $590.26 M in assets under management (AUM), while EWJV manages $720.72 M.
What sectors do the DBJP and EWJV ETFs invest in?
DBJP leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, EWJV focuses on Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the DBJP ETF and EWJV ETF?
DBJP top holdings include TOYOTA, MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP and HITACHI. EWJV holds in its top three: TOYOTA, MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP and SUMITOMO MITSUI.
Which ETF is more diversified: DBJP or EWJV?
DBJP holds 182 securities with 36.31% of its assets in the top 15. EWJV has 108 securities and a top 15 weight of 48.47%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
