Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
DBJPvsEWJETF Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) and iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ) belong to the same industry segment: Japan Blended Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. DBJP is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.45%, versus 0.49% for EWJ. DBJP is up 7.81% year-to-date (YTD) with +$120M in YTD flows. EWJ performs worse with 6.27% YTD performance, and +$3.07B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DBJP and EWJ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
DBJP vs EWJ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DBJP EWJ | -5.33%-8.69% | +8.61%+5.62% | +7.81%+6.27% | +42.40%+31.08% | +116.81%+65.21% | +143.93%+42.06% |
| Flows | DBJP EWJ | +$27M+$2.66B | +$120M+$3.37B | +$120M+$3.07B | +$64M+$2.52B | +$104M+$4.16B | +$137M+$2.46B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | DBJP EWJ | +23.04%+21.47% | +23.16%+21.38% | +21.48%+18.50% | +19.61%+18.07% |
| Max drawdown | DBJP EWJ | -9.16%-9.86% | -18.53%-14.78% | -25.81%-15.70% | -25.81%-33.16% |
| Max drawdown duration | DBJP EWJ | 9d28d | 63d37d | 350d225d | 350d902d |
DBJP | EWJ | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 7:59 PM | $102.39 | $84.54 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $102.78 | $85.73 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
DBJP | EWJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
DBJP | EWJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $102.39 | $84.54 |
| 1D performance | -0.38% | -1.39% |
| AuM | $590.26 M | $19.47 B |
| E/R | 0.45% | 0.49% |
DBJP | EWJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Xtrackers by DWS | iShares |
| Benchmark | MSCI Japan Index | MSCI Japan Index |
| N° of holdings | 179 | 179 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 8, 2011 | March 12, 1996 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the DBJP and EWJ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, DBJP is up 7.81% year-to-date (YTD), while EWJ has returned 6.27%. That puts DBJP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: DBJP or EWJ?
Year-to-date, the DBJP ETF saw +$120M in flows, compared to +$3.07B for EWJ.
Which ETF is more volatile: DBJP or EWJ?
Over the past year, DBJP had a volatility of 23.16%, while EWJ experienced 21.38%.
Which ETF is bigger: DBJP or EWJ?
As of March 10, 2026, DBJP holds $590.26 M in assets under management (AUM), while EWJ manages $19.47 B.
What sectors do the DBJP and EWJ ETFs invest in?
DBJP leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, EWJ focuses on Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the DBJP ETF and EWJ ETF?
DBJP top holdings include TOYOTA, MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP and HITACHI. EWJ holds in its top three: TOYOTA, MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP and HITACHI.
Which ETF is more diversified: DBJP or EWJ?
DBJP holds 182 securities with 36.31% of its assets in the top 15. EWJ has 182 securities and a top 15 weight of 37.21%.
Japan ETFs Gain Amid Nikkei and TOPIX Surge in June
The Two Sides of the Magnificent Seven Sword
Tony's ETF Buyers Guide: Japanese Equity ETFs
An introduction to Country-Based ETFs
An introduction to Country-Based ETFs
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
