Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
DBJPvsBBJPETF Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) belong to the same industry segment: Japan Blended Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. DBJP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.45%, versus 0.19% for BBJP. DBJP is up 7.81% year-to-date (YTD) with +$120M in YTD flows. BBJP performs worse with 7.29% YTD performance, and +$390M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DBJP and BBJP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
DBJP vs BBJP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DBJP BBJP | -5.33%-6.64% | +8.61%+6.98% | +7.81%+7.29% | +42.40%+32.19% | +116.81%+67.74% | +143.93%+45.21% |
| Flows | DBJP BBJP | +$27M+$479M | +$120M+$301M | +$120M+$390M | +$64M+$698M | +$104M+$3.62B | +$137M+$4.07B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | DBJP BBJP | +23.04%+20.90% | +23.16%+21.13% | +21.48%+18.33% | +19.61%+17.88% |
| Max drawdown | DBJP BBJP | -9.16%-9.83% | -18.53%-14.70% | -25.81%-15.55% | -25.81%-32.66% |
| Max drawdown duration | DBJP BBJP | 9d27d | 63d37d | 350d225d | 350d897d |
DBJP | BBJP | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $102.39 | $69.96 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $102.78 | $70.50 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
DBJP | BBJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
DBJP | BBJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $102.39 | $69.96 |
| 1D performance | -0.38% | -0.77% |
| AuM | $590.26 M | $15.44 B |
| E/R | 0.45% | 0.19% |
DBJP | BBJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Xtrackers by DWS | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | MSCI Japan Index | Morningstar Japan Target Market Exposure Index |
| N° of holdings | 179 | 180 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 8, 2011 | June 18, 2018 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the DBJP and BBJP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, DBJP is up 7.81% year-to-date (YTD), while BBJP has returned 7.29%. That puts DBJP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: DBJP or BBJP?
Year-to-date, the DBJP ETF saw +$120M in flows, compared to +$390M for BBJP.
Which ETF is more volatile: DBJP or BBJP?
Over the past year, DBJP had a volatility of 23.16%, while BBJP experienced 21.13%.
Which ETF is bigger: DBJP or BBJP?
As of March 10, 2026, DBJP holds $590.26 M in assets under management (AUM), while BBJP manages $15.44 B.
What sectors do the DBJP and BBJP ETFs invest in?
DBJP leans toward sectors like Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, BBJP focuses on Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the DBJP ETF and BBJP ETF?
DBJP top holdings include TOYOTA, MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP and HITACHI. BBJP holds in its top three: TOYOTA, MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP and HITACHI.
Which ETF is more diversified: DBJP or BBJP?
DBJP holds 182 securities with 36.31% of its assets in the top 15. BBJP has 180 securities and a top 15 weight of 36.95%.
Japan ETFs Gain Amid Nikkei and TOPIX Surge in June
The Two Sides of the Magnificent Seven Sword
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
