Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
DBEMvsBKEMETF Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) belong to the same industry segment: EM Large & Mid Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. DBEM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.66%, versus 0.11% for BKEM. DBEM is up 7.86% year-to-date (YTD) with +$4M in YTD flows. BKEM performs worse with 7.38% YTD performance, and +$8M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DBEM and BKEM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
DBEM vs BKEM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DBEM BKEM | -2.03%-2.62% | +9.27%+9.11% | +7.86%+7.38% | +36.33%+37.13% | +71.29%+66.62% | +34.57%+24.77% |
| Flows | DBEM BKEM | +$4M+$8M | +$4M+$8M | +$4M+$8M | -$5M-$63M | -$36M-$38M | -$35M+$20M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | DBEM BKEM | +17.99%+21.08% | +15.36%+17.41% | +13.11%+14.69% | +14.02%+16.01% |
| Max drawdown | DBEM BKEM | -8.20%-9.92% | -12.13%-13.26% | -13.24%-15.84% | -31.19%-35.98% |
| Max drawdown duration | DBEM BKEM | 12d12d | 56d52d | 242d245d | 1439d1512d |
DBEM | BKEM | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $34.05 | $79.39 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $34.97 | $81.97 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
DBEM | BKEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
DBEM | BKEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.05 | $79.39 |
| 1D performance | -2.62% | -3.15% |
| AuM | $88.38 M | $77.29 M |
| E/R | 0.66% | 0.11% |
DBEM | BKEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Xtrackers by DWS | BNY Mellon |
| Benchmark | MSCI Emerging Markets Index | Solactive GBS Emerging Markets Large & Mid Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 1039 | 1517 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 8, 2011 | April 22, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the DBEM and BKEM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, DBEM is up 7.86% year-to-date (YTD), while BKEM has returned 7.38%. That puts DBEM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: DBEM or BKEM?
Year-to-date, the DBEM ETF saw +$4M in flows, compared to +$8M for BKEM.
Which ETF is more volatile: DBEM or BKEM?
Over the past year, DBEM had a volatility of 15.36%, while BKEM experienced 17.41%.
Which ETF is bigger: DBEM or BKEM?
As of March 10, 2026, DBEM holds $88.38 M in assets under management (AUM), while BKEM manages $77.29 M.
What sectors do the DBEM and BKEM ETFs invest in?
DBEM leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, BKEM focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the DBEM ETF and BKEM ETF?
DBEM top holdings include TWN SEMICONT MAN, SAMSUNG ELECTR and TENCENT HOLDINGS. BKEM holds in its top three: TWN SEMICONT MAN, SAMSUNG ELECTR and TENCENT HOLDINGS.
Which ETF is more diversified: DBEM or BKEM?
DBEM holds 1146 securities with 34.47% of its assets in the top 15. BKEM has 1670 securities and a top 15 weight of 32.8%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
