Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
DBAWvsHAWXETF Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
The ETFs Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (HAWX) track the MSCI ACWI ex USA US Dollar Hedged Net Total Return Index - USD and belong to the same industry segment: Global Blended Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. DBAW is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.7% for HAWX. DBAW is up 4.92% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. HAWX performs better with 5.27% YTD performance, and +$3M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DBAW and HAWX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
DBAW vs HAWX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DBAW HAWX | -2.32%-3.00% | +6.58%+6.07% | +4.92%+5.27% | +26.82%+28.57% | +66.77%+73.01% | +71.22%+72.88% |
| Flows | DBAW HAWX | --$2M | +$6M+$4M | -+$3M | +$34M+$13M | +$31M+$50M | +$67M+$129M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | DBAW HAWX | +11.71%+13.35% | +12.32%+15.20% | +10.41%+12.40% | +10.85%+13.10% |
| Max drawdown | DBAW HAWX | -6.77%-6.13% | -13.17%-13.76% | -13.33%-13.76% | -17.38%-17.33% |
| Max drawdown duration | DBAW HAWX | 9d14d | 55d51d | 84d51d | 576d573d |
DBAW | HAWX | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $43.36 | $41.49 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $43.22 | $41.49 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
DBAW | HAWX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
DBAW | HAWX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $43.36 | $41.49 |
| 1D performance | +0.32% | +0.01% |
| AuM | $232.67 M | $315.55 M |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.7% |
DBAW | HAWX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Xtrackers by DWS | iShares |
| Benchmark | MSCI ACWI ex USA Index | MSCI ACWI ex USA Index |
| N° of holdings | 1704 | 1591 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 22, 2014 | June 29, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the DBAW and HAWX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, DBAW is up 4.92% year-to-date (YTD), while HAWX has returned 5.27%. That puts HAWX better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: DBAW or HAWX?
Year-to-date, the DBAW ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$3M for HAWX.
Which ETF is more volatile: DBAW or HAWX?
Over the past year, DBAW had a volatility of 12.32%, while HAWX experienced 15.2%.
Which ETF is bigger: DBAW or HAWX?
As of March 10, 2026, DBAW holds $232.67 M in assets under management (AUM), while HAWX manages $315.55 M.
What sectors do the DBAW and HAWX ETFs invest in?
DBAW leans toward sectors like Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, HAWX focuses on Financials, Information Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the DBAW ETF and HAWX ETF?
DBAW top holdings include TWN SEMICONT MAN, ASML HOLDING and SAMSUNG ELECTR. HAWX holds in its top three: ORIENT SEMICON, Netherlands, DSL 2.5% 15jan2033, EUR and SAMSUNG ELECTR.
Which ETF is more diversified: DBAW or HAWX?
DBAW holds 1846 securities with 16.39% of its assets in the top 15. HAWX has 1731 securities and a top 15 weight of 17.17%.
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.