DBAWvsCWIETF Comparison
ETF 1
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
This fund is part of
Global Blended Cap
-0.31%
VS
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) and State Street SPDR MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF (CWI) belong to the same industry segment: Global Blended Cap. DBAW's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Industrials. In contrast, CWI's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. DBAW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.3% for CWI. DBAW is up 14.97% year-to-date (YTD) with +$30M in YTD flows. CWI performs worse with 11.65% YTD performance, and +$145M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DBAW and CWI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
DBAW vs CWI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DBAW CWI | -1.21%-0.91% | +5.15%+3.25% | +14.97%+11.65% | +28.20%+22.29% | +71.46%+62.29% | +79.79%+55.44% |
| Flows | DBAW CWI | +$17M+$16M | +$21M+$40M | +$30M+$145M | +$48M+$390M | +$62M+$335M | +$83M+$377M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | DBAW CWI | +13.37%+15.47% | +11.77%+14.11% | +11.21%+13.33% | +11.35%+14.20% |
| Max drawdown | DBAW CWI | -4.26%-4.30% | -8.71%-10.82% | -13.33%-13.36% | -17.38%-28.77% |
| Max drawdown duration | DBAW CWI | 32d32d | 65d65d | 84d43d | 576d925d |
Trading data
DBAW | CWI | |
Last sale 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM | $47.27 | $39.65 |
| Previous close 07/24/2026 | $47.44 | $39.76 |
| Consolidated volume 07/24/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
DBAW | CWI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
DBAW | CWI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $47.27 | $39.65 |
| 1D performance | -0.36% | -0.28% |
| AuM | $285.54 M | $2.74 B |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.3% |
Characteristics
DBAW | CWI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Xtrackers by DWS | State Street Investment Management |
| Benchmark | MSCI ACWI ex USA Index | MSCI ACWI ex USA Index |
| N° of holdings | 1985 | 1102 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 22, 2014 | January 10, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
DBAW
Japan
13.59%
Taiwan
9.05%
Republic of Korea
7.86%
Canada
7.72%
United Kingdom
7.71%
Other
54.08%
CWI
Japan
13.84%
Taiwan
9.06%
Canada
8.35%
United Kingdom
8.21%
Republic of Korea
7.69%
Other
52.86%
Sectors
DBAW
Finance
25.65%
Technology
24.07%
Industrials
11.62%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.04%
Other
31.62%
CWI
Technology
24.83%
Finance
24.74%
Industrials
11.34%
Other
39.09%
Advertisement
Diversification
DBAW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
19.88%
CWI
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
21.32%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
DBAW
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
4.95%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
2.78%
SK hynix, Inc.
2.49%
ASML Holding NV
1.84%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
0.92%
HSBC Holdings Plc
0.86%
Roche Holding AG
0.77%
Royal Bank of Canada
0.75%
Novartis AG
0.75%
AstraZeneca PLC
0.74%
Nestlé SA
0.70%
Siemens AG
0.61%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
0.58%
Shell Plc
0.58%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
0.57%
CWI
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
5.38%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
2.90%
SK hynix, Inc.
2.55%
ASML Holding NV
2.11%
HSBC Holdings Plc
0.95%
Royal Bank of Canada
0.90%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
0.89%
Roche Holding AG
0.82%
Novartis AG
0.78%
AstraZeneca PLC
0.76%
Nestlé SA
0.72%
Siemens AG
0.69%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
0.66%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
0.61%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
0.61%
Frequently asked questions about DBAW and CWI
How have the DBAW and CWI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 24, 2026, DBAW is up 14.97% year-to-date (YTD), while CWI has returned 11.65%. That puts DBAW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: DBAW or CWI?
Year-to-date, the DBAW ETF saw +$30M in flows, compared to +$145M for CWI.
Which ETF is more volatile: DBAW or CWI?
Over the past year, DBAW had a volatility of 11.77%, while CWI experienced 14.11%.
Which ETF is bigger: DBAW or CWI?
As of July 24, 2026, DBAW holds $285.54 M in assets under management (AUM), while CWI manages $2.74 B.
What sectors do the DBAW and CWI ETFs invest in?
DBAW leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, CWI focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the DBAW ETF and CWI ETF?
DBAW top holdings include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and SK hynix, Inc.. CWI holds in its top three: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and SK hynix, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: DBAW or CWI?
DBAW holds 2066 securities with 19.88% of its assets in the top 15. CWI has 1107 securities and a top 15 weight of 21.32%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
