Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
DBAWvsACWXETF Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) and iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) belong to the same industry segment: Global Blended Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. DBAW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.32% for ACWX. DBAW is up 4.92% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. ACWX performs worse with 4.77% YTD performance, and +$744M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DBAW and ACWX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
DBAW vs ACWX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DBAW ACWX | -2.32%-4.54% | +6.58%+5.73% | +4.92%+4.77% | +26.82%+30.42% | +66.77%+64.34% | +71.22%+45.36% |
| Flows | DBAW ACWX | -+$387M | +$6M+$929M | -+$744M | +$34M+$2.34B | +$31M+$2.34B | +$67M+$3.60B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | DBAW ACWX | +11.71%+14.83% | +12.32%+15.26% | +10.41%+13.45% | +10.85%+14.94% |
| Max drawdown | DBAW ACWX | -6.77%-7.09% | -13.17%-13.37% | -13.33%-13.37% | -17.38%-30.01% |
| Max drawdown duration | DBAW ACWX | 9d14d | 55d43d | 84d43d | 576d1065d |
DBAW | ACWX | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $43.36 | $70.22 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $43.22 | $70.29 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
DBAW | ACWX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
DBAW | ACWX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $43.36 | $70.22 |
| 1D performance | +0.32% | -0.10% |
| AuM | $232.67 M | $8.97 B |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.32% |
DBAW | ACWX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Xtrackers by DWS | iShares |
| Benchmark | MSCI ACWI ex USA Index | MSCI ACWI ex USA Index |
| N° of holdings | 1704 | 1591 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 22, 2014 | March 26, 2008 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the DBAW and ACWX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, DBAW is up 4.92% year-to-date (YTD), while ACWX has returned 4.77%. That puts DBAW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: DBAW or ACWX?
Year-to-date, the DBAW ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$744M for ACWX.
Which ETF is more volatile: DBAW or ACWX?
Over the past year, DBAW had a volatility of 12.32%, while ACWX experienced 15.26%.
Which ETF is bigger: DBAW or ACWX?
As of March 10, 2026, DBAW holds $232.67 M in assets under management (AUM), while ACWX manages $8.97 B.
What sectors do the DBAW and ACWX ETFs invest in?
DBAW leans toward sectors like Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, ACWX focuses on Financials, Information Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the DBAW ETF and ACWX ETF?
DBAW top holdings include TWN SEMICONT MAN, ASML HOLDING and SAMSUNG ELECTR. ACWX holds in its top three: TWN SEMICONT MAN, ASML HOLDING and SAMSUNG ELECTR.
Which ETF is more diversified: DBAW or ACWX?
DBAW holds 1846 securities with 16.39% of its assets in the top 15. ACWX has 1731 securities and a top 15 weight of 16.93%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
