DBAWvsACWXETF Comparison
ETF 1
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
This fund is part of
Global Blended Cap
+0.26%
VS
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) and iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) belong to the same industry segment: Global Blended Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. DBAW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.32% for ACWX. DBAW is up 13.73% year-to-date (YTD) with +$9M in YTD flows. ACWX performs worse with 11.48% YTD performance, and +$2.36B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DBAW and ACWX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
DBAW vs ACWX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/09/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DBAW ACWX | +1.12%-1.26% | +10.56%+6.92% | +13.73%+11.48% | +31.58%+26.80% | +72.90%+64.61% | +76.07%+46.44% |
| Flows | DBAW ACWX | -- | +$9M+$1.62B | +$9M+$2.36B | +$31M+$3.16B | +$40M+$4.01B | +$68M+$4.87B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | DBAW ACWX | +15.20%+21.49% | +10.87%+15.23% | +10.97%+14.38% | +11.19%+15.52% |
| Max drawdown | DBAW ACWX | -4.14%-5.85% | -8.71%-11.33% | -13.33%-13.37% | -17.38%-30.01% |
| Max drawdown duration | DBAW ACWX | 27d28d | 65d69d | 84d43d | 576d1065d |
Trading data
DBAW | ACWX | |
Last sale 6/10/2026 at 1:30 PM | $46.07 | $73.63 |
| Previous close 06/09/2026 | $46.64 | $74.73 |
| Consolidated volume 06/09/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
DBAW | ACWX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/10/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
DBAW | ACWX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $46.07 | $73.63 |
| 1D performance | -1.22% | -1.47% |
| AuM | $261.56 M | $11.30 B |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.32% |
Characteristics
DBAW | ACWX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Xtrackers by DWS | iShares |
| Benchmark | MSCI ACWI ex USA Index | MSCI ACWI ex USA Index |
| N° of holdings | 1781 | 1568 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 22, 2014 | March 26, 2008 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
DBAW
Japan
13.19%
United Kingdom
8.53%
Canada
8.18%
Taiwan
7.87%
Other
62.23%
ACWX
Japan
13.62%
United Kingdom
8.65%
Canada
8.4%
Taiwan
7.85%
Other
61.47%
Sectors
DBAW
Financials
22.51%
Information Techn.
17.78%
Industrials
13.37%
Consumer Discreti.
7.86%
Other
38.48%
ACWX
Financials
23.04%
Information Techn.
18%
Industrials
13.66%
Consumer Discreti.
7.99%
Other
37.31%
Advertisement
Diversification
DBAW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
17.62%
ACWX
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
17.71%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
DBAW
TWN SEMICONT MAN
4.67%
SAMSUNG ELECTR
1.91%
ASML HOLDING
1.55%
SK HYNIX
1.22%
TENCENT HOLDINGS
1.09%
HSBC HOLDINGS
0.84%
ASTRAZENECA
0.80%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD
0.79%
CH1499059983
0.78%
NOVARTIS
0.75%
NESTLE SA
0.73%
SHELL PLC
0.69%
ROYAL BK CANADA
0.67%
SIEMENS
0.57%
COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA
0.57%
ACWX
TWN SEMICONT MAN
4.57%
SAMSUNG ELECTR
1.94%
ASML HOLDING
1.53%
SK HYNIX
1.30%
TENCENT HOLDINGS
1.06%
HSBC HOLDINGS
0.87%
ASTRAZENECA
0.81%
CH1499059983
0.79%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD
0.77%
NOVARTIS
0.77%
NESTLE SA
0.72%
SHELL PLC
0.71%
ROYAL BK CANADA
0.69%
SIEMENS
0.62%
MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP
0.57%
Frequently asked questions about DBAW and ACWX
How have the DBAW and ACWX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 9, 2026, DBAW is up 13.73% year-to-date (YTD), while ACWX has returned 11.48%. That puts DBAW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: DBAW or ACWX?
Year-to-date, the DBAW ETF saw +$9M in flows, compared to +$2.36B for ACWX.
Which ETF is more volatile: DBAW or ACWX?
Over the past year, DBAW had a volatility of 10.87%, while ACWX experienced 15.23%.
Which ETF is bigger: DBAW or ACWX?
As of June 9, 2026, DBAW holds $261.56 M in assets under management (AUM), while ACWX manages $11.30 B.
What sectors do the DBAW and ACWX ETFs invest in?
DBAW leans toward sectors like Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, ACWX focuses on Financials, Information Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the DBAW ETF and ACWX ETF?
DBAW top holdings include TWN SEMICONT MAN, SAMSUNG ELECTR and ASML HOLDING. ACWX holds in its top three: TWN SEMICONT MAN, SAMSUNG ELECTR and ASML HOLDING.
Which ETF is more diversified: DBAW or ACWX?
DBAW holds 1947 securities with 17.62% of its assets in the top 15. ACWX has 1710 securities and a top 15 weight of 17.71%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
