DBAWvsACWXETF Comparison
ETF 1
DBAW
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF
This fund is part of
Global Blended Cap
-0.2%
VS
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US Hedged Equity ETF (DBAW) and iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX) belong to the same industry segment: Global Blended Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Technology and Industrials. DBAW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.32% for ACWX. DBAW is up 17.9% year-to-date (YTD) with +$69M in YTD flows. ACWX performs better with 17.99% YTD performance, and +$3.15B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DBAW and ACWX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
DBAW vs ACWX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/08/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DBAW ACWX | +0.34%+1.63% | +4.64%+6.16% | +17.90%+17.99% | +28.40%+26.27% | +77.55%+77.13% | +79.20%+56.02% |
| Flows | DBAW ACWX | +$29M+$575M | +$60M+$789M | +$69M+$3.15B | +$81M+$3.93B | +$100M+$4.80B | +$118M+$5.46B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | DBAW ACWX | +12.83%+17.16% | +12.09%+16.59% | +11.28%+14.78% | +11.39%+15.78% |
| Max drawdown | DBAW ACWX | -4.64%-5.31% | -8.71%-11.33% | -13.33%-13.37% | -17.38%-29.09% |
| Max drawdown duration | DBAW ACWX | 78d50d | 65d69d | 84d43d | 576d906d |
Trading data
DBAW | ACWX | |
Last sale 9/8/2026 at 7:55 PM | $48.36 | $77.94 |
| Previous close 09/08/2026 | $48.82 | $78.24 |
| Consolidated volume 09/08/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
DBAW | ACWX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/8/2026 at 7:55 PM
Live
Closed
DBAW | ACWX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $48.36 | $77.94 |
| 1D performance | -0.95% | -0.38% |
| AuM | $331.53 M | $12.62 B |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.32% |
Characteristics
DBAW | ACWX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Xtrackers by DWS | iShares |
| Benchmark | MSCI ACWI ex USA Index | MSCI ACWI ex USA Index |
| N° of holdings | 2004 | 1790 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 22, 2014 | March 26, 2008 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
DBAW
Japan
13.32%
United Kingdom
8.24%
Canada
8.15%
Taiwan
8.15%
Other
62.14%
ACWX
Japan
13.86%
United Kingdom
8.46%
Canada
8.29%
Taiwan
8.02%
Other
61.37%
Sectors
DBAW
Finance
27.23%
Technology
20.52%
Industrials
11.63%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.04%
Other
33.58%
ACWX
Finance
27.98%
Technology
20.51%
Industrials
12.14%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.31%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.28%
Other
24.79%
Advertisement
Diversification
DBAW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
18.13%
ACWX
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
18.18%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
DBAW
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
4.66%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
1.90%
ASML Holding NV
1.66%
SK hynix, Inc.
1.58%
HSBC Holdings Plc
0.96%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
0.95%
Roche Holding AG
0.85%
Royal Bank of Canada
0.81%
Novartis AG
0.78%
AstraZeneca PLC
0.70%
Nestlé SA
0.70%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
0.65%
Shell Plc
0.65%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
0.64%
Siemens AG
0.62%
ACWX
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
4.61%
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
1.85%
ASML Holding NV
1.77%
SK hynix, Inc.
1.40%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
1.02%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.00%
Roche Holding AG
0.84%
Royal Bank of Canada
0.81%
Novartis AG
0.79%
Nestlé SA
0.72%
AstraZeneca PLC
0.71%
Shell Plc
0.69%
Siemens AG
0.66%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
0.66%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
0.65%
Frequently asked questions about DBAW and ACWX
How have the DBAW and ACWX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 8, 2026, DBAW is up 17.9% year-to-date (YTD), while ACWX has returned 17.99%. That puts ACWX better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: DBAW or ACWX?
Year-to-date, the DBAW ETF saw +$69M in flows, compared to +$3.15B for ACWX.
Which ETF is more volatile: DBAW or ACWX?
Over the past year, DBAW had a volatility of 12.09%, while ACWX experienced 16.59%.
Which ETF is bigger: DBAW or ACWX?
As of September 8, 2026, DBAW holds $331.53 M in assets under management (AUM), while ACWX manages $12.62 B.
What sectors do the DBAW and ACWX ETFs invest in?
DBAW leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, ACWX focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the DBAW ETF and ACWX ETF?
DBAW top holdings include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and ASML Holding NV. ACWX holds in its top three: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and ASML Holding NV.
Which ETF is more diversified: DBAW or ACWX?
DBAW holds 2083 securities with 18.13% of its assets in the top 15. ACWX has 1853 securities and a top 15 weight of 18.18%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
