DAKvsQVMLETF Comparison
Dakota Active Equity ETF (DAK) belongs to the Uncategorized Equities segment. Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Financials and Communication Services. DAK is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.43%, versus 0.11% for QVML. DAK is up 3.96% year-to-date (YTD) with +$4K in YTD flows. QVML performs better with 4.98% YTD performance, and -$4M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DAK and QVML below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
DAK vs QVML performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DAK QVML | +10.53%+12.82% | +2.33%+3.15% | +3.96%+4.98% | n/a+29.02% | n/a+75.74% | n/an/a |
| Flows | DAK QVML | --$4M | -$2M-$4M | +$4K-$4M | -+$75M | -+$81M | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | DAK QVML | +13.55%+15.07% | n/a+12.19% | n/a+14.77% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | DAK QVML | -7.85%-8.73% | n/a-8.73% | n/a-18.54% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | DAK QVML | 71d70d | n/a70d | n/a127d | n/an/a |
DAK | QVML | |
Last sale 4/30/2026 at 1:30 PM | $27.91 | $42.00 |
| Previous close 04/29/2026 | $27.62 | $42.04 |
| Consolidated volume 04/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
DAK | QVML | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
DAK | QVML | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $27.91 | $42.00 |
| 1D performance | +1.05% | -0.11% |
| AuM | $40.49 M | $1.55 B |
| E/R | 0.43% | 0.11% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
