DAKvsIWBETF Comparison
Dakota Active Equity ETF (DAK) belongs to the Uncategorized Equities segment. iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) is part of the US Large Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Technology, Finance and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. DAK is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.43%, versus 0.15% for IWB. DAK is up 9.34% year-to-date (YTD) with -$11K in YTD flows. IWB performs better with 9.44% YTD performance, and -$2.12B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DAK and IWB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
DAK vs IWB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DAK IWB | +1.00%+0.67% | +5.47%+4.77% | +9.34%+9.44% | n/a+19.07% | n/a+69.62% | n/a+81.15% |
| Flows | DAK IWB | --$38M | -$15K-$514M | -$11K-$2.12B | --$794M | --$2.61B | --$2.26B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | DAK IWB | +11.77%+12.79% | n/a+12.76% | n/a+15.20% | n/a+17.30% |
| Max drawdown | DAK IWB | -4.04%-4.33% | n/a-8.86% | n/a-19.16% | n/a-25.17% |
| Max drawdown duration | DAK IWB | 52d45d | n/a76d | n/a126d | n/a709d |
DAK | IWB | |
Last sale 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $29.03 | $406.71 |
| Previous close 07/16/2026 | $29.23 | $410.90 |
| Consolidated volume 07/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
DAK | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
DAK | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $29.03 | $406.71 |
| 1D performance | -0.69% | -1.02% |
| AuM | $42.50 M | $48.04 B |
| E/R | 0.43% | 0.15% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
