DABSvsPINCETF Comparison
DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS) and PGIM Securitized Income ETF (PINC) have similar underlying exposures to countries and sectors. DABS's top 2 sector exposures are Industrials and Non-Corporate. In contrast, PINC's top sector exposures are Sovereign, Industrials and Non-Corporate. DABS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.4%, versus 0.39% for PINC. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of DABS and PINC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
DABS vs PINC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DABS PINC | +0.04%-0.02% | -0.38%-0.40% | +1.40%n/a | +1.98%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | DABS PINC | +$14M+$1M | +$24M+$1M | +$80M- | +$99M- | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | DABS PINC | +1.69%+1.80% | +1.61%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | DABS PINC | -1.16%-1.28% | -1.19%n/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | DABS PINC | 52d51d | 114dn/a | n/an/a | n/an/a |
DABS | PINC | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $49.77 | |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $49.71 | |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
DABS | PINC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $49.77 | – |
| 1D performance | +0.12% | – |
| AuM | $168.78 M | $25.84 M |
| E/R | 0.4% | 0.39% |
DABS | PINC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | DoubleLine | PGIM |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 15 | 7 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 3, 2025 | June 1, 2026 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
