CZARvsQWLDETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
QWLD
State Street SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF
This fund is part of
DM Large & Mid Cap
+0.12%
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF (CZAR) and State Street SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD) belong to the same industry segment: DM Large & Mid Cap. CZAR's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Finance. In contrast, QWLD's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. CZAR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.3% for QWLD. CZAR is up 0.43% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. QWLD performs better with 7.63% YTD performance, and -$15M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CZAR and QWLD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CZAR vs QWLD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CZAR QWLD | +3.67%+1.89% | +1.60%+3.33% | +0.43%+7.63% | +1.13%+15.48% | n/a+52.06% | n/a+60.44% |
| Flows | CZAR QWLD | -- | --$19M | --$15M | --$15M | -+$32M | -+$64M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CZAR QWLD | +9.63%+7.34% | +10.13%+8.34% | n/a+9.73% | n/a+11.83% |
| Max drawdown | CZAR QWLD | -3.77%-2.03% | -8.37%-7.55% | n/a-11.20% | n/a-22.83% |
| Max drawdown duration | CZAR QWLD | 51d16d | 270d73d | n/a84d | n/a709d |
Trading data
CZAR | QWLD | |
Last sale 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM | $32.05 | $152.84 |
| Previous close 07/23/2026 | $31.71 | $151.79 |
| Consolidated volume 07/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CZAR | QWLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CZAR | QWLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $32.05 | $152.84 |
| 1D performance | +1.07% | +0.69% |
| AuM | $1.60 M | $172.09 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.3% |
Characteristics
CZAR | QWLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Themes Management Company | State Street Investment Management |
| Benchmark | Solactive Natural Monopoly Index | MSCI World Factor Mix A-Series Index |
| N° of holdings | 96 | 1226 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 13, 2023 | June 4, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CZAR
USA
58.4%
United Kingdom
8.57%
Other
33.03%
QWLD
USA
64.45%
Japan
7.54%
Other
28.01%
Sectors
CZAR
Technology
21.42%
Industrials
18.31%
Finance
17.7%
Healthcare
7.95%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.66%
Other
26.96%
QWLD
Technology
28.77%
Finance
16.9%
Healthcare
12.95%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.69%
Industrials
8.87%
Other
22.83%
Advertisement
Diversification
CZAR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
53.12%
QWLD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
21.76%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
CZAR
Cisco Systems, Inc.
5.97%
US4385162056
4.81%
Fortive Corp.
4.50%
Broadcom Inc.
4.28%
BAE Systems Plc
4.21%
ASX Ltd.
3.84%
Visa, Inc.
3.53%
Raymond James Financial, Inc.
3.42%
BlackRock, Inc.
3.35%
Mastercard, Inc.
3.28%
Paychex, Inc.
3.05%
The Sage Group plc
2.56%
Autodesk, Inc.
2.30%
Johnson & Johnson
2.11%
AbbVie, Inc.
1.91%
QWLD
Microsoft Corp.
2.34%
Apple, Inc.
2.29%
NVIDIA Corp.
2.21%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.79%
Broadcom Inc.
1.74%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.45%
ASML Holding NV
1.38%
Johnson & Johnson
1.36%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.17%
Visa, Inc.
1.15%
Applied Materials, Inc.
1.09%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.06%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.04%
Lam Research Corp.
0.87%
Novartis AG
0.85%
Frequently asked questions about CZAR and QWLD
How have the CZAR and QWLD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 24, 2026, CZAR is up 0.43% year-to-date (YTD), while QWLD has returned 7.63%. That puts QWLD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CZAR or QWLD?
Year-to-date, the CZAR ETF saw - in flows, compared to -$15M for QWLD.
Which ETF is more volatile: CZAR or QWLD?
Over the past year, CZAR had a volatility of 10.13%, while QWLD experienced 8.34%.
Which ETF is bigger: CZAR or QWLD?
As of July 24, 2026, CZAR holds $1.60 M in assets under management (AUM), while QWLD manages $172.09 M.
What sectors do the CZAR and QWLD ETFs invest in?
CZAR leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Finance. Meanwhile, QWLD focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the CZAR ETF and QWLD ETF?
CZAR top holdings include Cisco Systems, Inc., US4385162056 and Fortive Corp.. QWLD holds in its top three: Microsoft Corp., Apple, Inc. and NVIDIA Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: CZAR or QWLD?
CZAR holds 96 securities with 53.12% of its assets in the top 15. QWLD has 1241 securities and a top 15 weight of 21.76%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
