CZAvsULVMETF Comparison
VS
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA) and VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. CZA's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Health Care. In contrast, ULVM's top sector exposures are Financials, Utilities and Industrials. CZA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.69%, versus 0.25% for ULVM. CZA is up 7.86% year-to-date (YTD) with -$53M in YTD flows. ULVM performs better with 15.15% YTD performance, and +$24M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CZA and ULVM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CZA vs ULVM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/09/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CZA ULVM | +2.41%+2.61% | +5.16%+8.23% | +7.86%+15.15% | +14.89%+28.34% | +43.15%+76.80% | +40.85%+75.00% |
| Flows | CZA ULVM | -$6M+$5M | -$12M+$5M | -$53M+$24M | -$26M+$56M | -$73M-$58M | -$95M-$277M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CZA ULVM | +14.14%+11.84% | +12.85%+10.83% | +14.60%+13.94% | +16.13%+15.63% |
| Max drawdown | CZA ULVM | -5.36%-3.54% | -9.18%-6.51% | -18.73%-18.21% | -18.73%-19.79% |
| Max drawdown duration | CZA ULVM | 29d24d | 97d49d | 373d232d | 373d717d |
Trading data
CZA | ULVM | |
Last sale 6/9/2026 at 7:09 PM | $119.38 | $103.83 |
| Previous close 06/09/2026 | $117.83 | $104.38 |
| Consolidated volume 06/09/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CZA | ULVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/9/2026 at 7:09 PM
Live
Closed
CZA | ULVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $119.38 | $103.83 |
| 1D performance | +1.31% | -0.52% |
| AuM | $182.74 M | $260.94 M |
| E/R | 0.69% | 0.25% |
Characteristics
CZA | ULVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | VictoryShares |
| Benchmark | Zacks Mid-Cap Core Index | Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index |
| N° of holdings | 92 | 120 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 2, 2007 | October 24, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CZA
USA
85.19%
Other
14.81%
ULVM
USA
92.38%
Other
7.62%
Sectors
CZA
Financials
23.68%
Industrials
13.67%
Health Care
10.03%
Information Techn.
9.95%
Utilities
9.6%
Real Estate
9.59%
Other
23.48%
ULVM
Financials
22.71%
Utilities
13.09%
Industrials
12.41%
Information Techn.
10.51%
Health Care
9.97%
Real Estate
7.9%
Other
23.41%
Advertisement
Diversification
CZA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
27.14%
ULVM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
20.21%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
CZA
STATE STREET
2.10%
AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP
2.01%
PUBLIC SRVCE ENT
1.99%
HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GRUP
1.87%
LAS VEGAS SNDS
1.87%
ROPER TECHNOLOGIES INC
1.85%
PG&E
1.81%
SYSCO
1.79%
US89677Q1076
1.78%
BMG93A5A1010
1.73%
FISERV
1.70%
ARCH CAPITAL GROUP
1.70%
HUNTINGTON BANCSHARES
1.66%
PRUDENTIAL FINL
1.64%
AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES
1.62%
ULVM
LOEWS
1.52%
FIRSTENERGY
1.52%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
1.47%
AMEREN
1.46%
ATMOS ENERGY
1.43%
EVERGY
1.42%
CENTERPOINT ENERGY
1.38%
VICI PROPERTIES INC
1.31%
REALTY INCOME REIT
1.29%
ENTERGY
1.29%
VENTAS REIT
1.27%
CONSOLIDATED EDISON
1.26%
WP CAREY INC
1.24%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
1.18%
CHUBB LTD
1.17%
Frequently asked questions about CZA and ULVM
How have the CZA and ULVM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 9, 2026, CZA is up 7.86% year-to-date (YTD), while ULVM has returned 15.15%. That puts ULVM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CZA or ULVM?
Year-to-date, the CZA ETF saw -$53M in flows, compared to +$24M for ULVM.
Which ETF is more volatile: CZA or ULVM?
Over the past year, CZA had a volatility of 12.85%, while ULVM experienced 10.83%.
Which ETF is bigger: CZA or ULVM?
As of June 9, 2026, CZA holds $182.74 M in assets under management (AUM), while ULVM manages $260.94 M.
What sectors do the CZA and ULVM ETFs invest in?
CZA leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Health Care. Meanwhile, ULVM focuses on Financials, Utilities and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the CZA ETF and ULVM ETF?
CZA top holdings include STATE STREET, AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP and PUBLIC SRVCE ENT. ULVM holds in its top three: LOEWS, FIRSTENERGY and BERKSHIRE HATHWAY.
Which ETF is more diversified: CZA or ULVM?
CZA holds 101 securities with 27.14% of its assets in the top 15. ULVM has 124 securities and a top 15 weight of 20.21%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
