CZAvsULVMETF Comparison
VS
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA) and VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. CZA's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Healthcare. In contrast, ULVM's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Utilities. CZA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.69%, versus 0.25% for ULVM. CZA is up 12.38% year-to-date (YTD) with -$56M in YTD flows. ULVM performs better with 20.19% YTD performance, and +$19M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CZA and ULVM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CZA vs ULVM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CZA ULVM | +2.96%+2.74% | +7.17%+9.21% | +12.38%+20.19% | +16.42%+28.39% | +41.17%+74.99% | +45.36%+83.79% |
| Flows | CZA ULVM | -$1M-$5M | -$9M-$108K | -$56M+$19M | -$23M+$46M | -$74M-$18M | -$97M-$256M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CZA ULVM | +10.79%+10.33% | +12.62%+10.83% | +14.60%+13.96% | +16.04%+15.54% |
| Max drawdown | CZA ULVM | -2.82%-1.60% | -9.18%-6.51% | -18.73%-18.21% | -18.73%-19.79% |
| Max drawdown duration | CZA ULVM | 28d15d | 97d49d | 373d232d | 373d717d |
Trading data
CZA | ULVM | |
Last sale 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM | $124.47 | $108.75 |
| Previous close 07/23/2026 | $123.12 | $107.72 |
| Consolidated volume 07/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CZA | ULVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CZA | ULVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $124.47 | $108.75 |
| 1D performance | +1.10% | +0.95% |
| AuM | $187.90 M | $266.43 M |
| E/R | 0.69% | 0.25% |
Characteristics
CZA | ULVM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | VictoryShares |
| Benchmark | Zacks Mid-Cap Core Index | Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index |
| N° of holdings | 101 | 123 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 2, 2007 | October 24, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CZA
USA
84.13%
Other
15.87%
ULVM
USA
92.61%
Other
7.39%
Sectors
CZA
Finance
36.42%
Industrials
14.86%
Healthcare
13.46%
Utilities
10.55%
Consumer Services
8.21%
Technology
7.17%
Other
9.33%
ULVM
Finance
35.76%
Industrials
11.03%
Utilities
10.4%
Healthcare
10.4%
Technology
7.46%
Other
24.95%
Diversification
CZA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
28.47%
ULVM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
21.43%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
CZA
Flex Ltd.
2.47%
State Street Corp.
2.19%
Humana, Inc.
2.15%
Viking Holdings Ltd. (Bermuda)
2.10%
Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc.
1.98%
American International Group, Inc.
1.95%
Sysco Corp.
1.88%
PG&E Corp.
1.83%
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
1.81%
Prudential Financial, Inc.
1.77%
The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc.
1.74%
Huntington Bancshares, Inc.
1.70%
Roper Technologies, Inc.
1.69%
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
1.64%
Centene Corp.
1.59%
ULVM
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.66%
Johnson & Johnson
1.56%
Evergy, Inc.
1.50%
Realty Income Corp.
1.49%
Loews Corp.
1.49%
Atmos Energy Corp.
1.49%
Ameren Corp.
1.48%
CenterPoint Energy, Inc.
1.48%
Consolidated Edison, Inc.
1.39%
Chubb Ltd.
1.39%
Cincinnati Financial Corp.
1.39%
W.P. Carey, Inc.
1.38%
VICI Properties, Inc.
1.31%
Snap-On, Inc.
1.23%
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
1.20%
Frequently asked questions about CZA and ULVM
How have the CZA and ULVM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 24, 2026, CZA is up 12.38% year-to-date (YTD), while ULVM has returned 20.19%. That puts ULVM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CZA or ULVM?
Year-to-date, the CZA ETF saw -$56M in flows, compared to +$19M for ULVM.
Which ETF is more volatile: CZA or ULVM?
Over the past year, CZA had a volatility of 12.62%, while ULVM experienced 10.83%.
Which ETF is bigger: CZA or ULVM?
As of July 24, 2026, CZA holds $187.90 M in assets under management (AUM), while ULVM manages $266.43 M.
What sectors do the CZA and ULVM ETFs invest in?
CZA leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Healthcare. Meanwhile, ULVM focuses on Finance, Industrials and Utilities.
What are the top holdings of the CZA ETF and ULVM ETF?
CZA top holdings include Flex Ltd., State Street Corp. and Humana, Inc.. ULVM holds in its top three: Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and Evergy, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CZA or ULVM?
CZA holds 101 securities with 28.47% of its assets in the top 15. ULVM has 124 securities and a top 15 weight of 21.43%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
