Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CZAvsREMCETF Comparison
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA) and Columbia Research Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (REMC) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. CZA's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Materials. In contrast, REMC's top sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Financials. CZA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.69%, versus 0.32% for REMC. CZA is down -0.25% year-to-date (YTD) with -$42M in YTD flows. REMC performs better with 0.18% YTD performance, and -$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CZA and REMC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CZA vs REMC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CZA REMC | -5.31%-3.71% | -1.36%-1.09% | -0.25%+0.18% | +10.92%n/a | +36.60%n/a | +41.56%n/a |
| Flows | CZA REMC | --$2M | -$3M+$3M | -$42M-$2M | -$19M- | -$67M- | -$98M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CZA REMC | +12.45%+12.37% | +17.64%n/a | +14.77%n/a | +16.06%n/a |
| Max drawdown | CZA REMC | -6.67%-4.34% | -13.23%n/a | -18.73%n/a | -18.73%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CZA REMC | 15d13d | 37dn/a | 373dn/a | 373dn/a |
CZA | REMC | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $110.44 | $19.83 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $110.66 | $19.87 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CZA | REMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CZA | REMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $110.44 | $19.83 |
| 1D performance | -0.20% | -0.20% |
| AuM | $180.04 M | $3.02 M |
| E/R | 0.69% | 0.32% |
CZA | REMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Invesco | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Benchmark | Zacks Mid-Cap Core Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 90 | 266 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 2, 2007 | December 11, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CZA and REMC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, CZA is down -0.25% year-to-date (YTD), while REMC has returned 0.18%. That puts REMC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CZA or REMC?
Year-to-date, the CZA ETF saw -$42M in flows, compared to -$2M for REMC.
Which ETF is bigger: CZA or REMC?
As of March 13, 2026, CZA holds $180.04 M in assets under management (AUM), while REMC manages $3.02 M.
What sectors do the CZA and REMC ETFs invest in?
CZA leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Materials. Meanwhile, REMC focuses on Industrials, Information Technology and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the CZA ETF and REMC ETF?
CZA top holdings include IQVIA HOLDINGS INC, NUCOR and WABTEC. REMC holds in its top three: HILTON INC, PHILLIPS 66 and VALERO ENERGY.
Which ETF is more diversified: CZA or REMC?
CZA holds 101 securities with 28.8% of its assets in the top 15. REMC has 271 securities and a top 15 weight of 17.89%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
