Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CZAvsONEVETF Comparison
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) is part of the US Low Volatility segment. CZA's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Materials. In contrast, ONEV's top sector exposures are Industrials, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary. CZA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.69%, versus 0.2% for ONEV. CZA is up 1.81% year-to-date (YTD) with -$42M in YTD flows. ONEV performs better with 3.06% YTD performance, and -$29M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CZA and ONEV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CZA vs ONEV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CZA ONEV | -3.57%-3.49% | +1.78%+2.79% | +1.81%+3.06% | +10.31%+9.76% | +36.28%+42.15% | +48.16%+54.87% |
| Flows | CZA ONEV | --$1M | -$3M-$53M | -$42M-$29M | -$18M-$86M | -$67M-$196M | -$98M-$162M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CZA ONEV | +12.30%+10.74% | +17.64%+15.02% | +14.82%+12.94% | +16.05%+14.76% |
| Max drawdown | CZA ONEV | -4.74%-4.12% | -13.23%-10.87% | -18.73%-14.90% | -18.73%-18.48% |
| Max drawdown duration | CZA ONEV | 12d8d | 37d42d | 373d254d | 373d566d |
CZA | ONEV | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $112.41 | $136.62 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $112.65 | $137.22 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CZA | ONEV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CZA | ONEV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $112.41 | $136.62 |
| 1D performance | -0.22% | -0.44% |
| AuM | $183.76 M | $543.40 M |
| E/R | 0.69% | 0.2% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CZA and ONEV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, CZA is up 1.81% year-to-date (YTD), while ONEV has returned 3.06%. That puts ONEV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CZA or ONEV?
Year-to-date, the CZA ETF saw -$42M in flows, compared to -$29M for ONEV.
Which ETF is more volatile: CZA or ONEV?
Over the past year, CZA had a volatility of 17.64%, while ONEV experienced 15.02%.
Which ETF is bigger: CZA or ONEV?
As of March 10, 2026, CZA holds $183.76 M in assets under management (AUM), while ONEV manages $543.40 M.
What sectors do the CZA and ONEV ETFs invest in?
CZA leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Materials. Meanwhile, ONEV focuses on Industrials, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the CZA ETF and ONEV ETF?
CZA top holdings include IQVIA HOLDINGS INC, NUCOR and WABTEC. ONEV holds in its top three: CARDINAL HEALTH, AMERISOURCEBERGEN and COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTN.
Which ETF is more diversified: CZA or ONEV?
CZA holds 101 securities with 28.8% of its assets in the top 15. ONEV has 439 securities and a top 15 weight of 13.17%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
