CZAvsONEVETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
ONEV
State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF
This fund is part of
US Low Volatility
+0.86%
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) is part of the US Low Volatility segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Industrials and Healthcare. CZA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.69%, versus 0.2% for ONEV. CZA is up 12.38% year-to-date (YTD) with -$56M in YTD flows. ONEV performs worse with 10.08% YTD performance, and -$299M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CZA and ONEV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CZA vs ONEV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CZA ONEV | +2.96%+3.07% | +7.17%+4.85% | +12.38%+10.08% | +16.42%+12.42% | +41.17%+37.37% | +45.36%+52.46% |
| Flows | CZA ONEV | -$1M-$97M | -$9M-$219M | -$56M-$299M | -$23M-$348M | -$74M-$417M | -$97M-$443M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CZA ONEV | +10.79%+11.25% | +12.62%+11.39% | +14.60%+12.77% | +16.04%+14.72% |
| Max drawdown | CZA ONEV | -2.82%-2.10% | -9.18%-7.77% | -18.73%-14.90% | -18.73%-18.48% |
| Max drawdown duration | CZA ONEV | 28d28d | 97d98d | 373d254d | 373d566d |
Trading data
CZA | ONEV | |
Last sale 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM | $124.47 | $146.91 |
| Previous close 07/23/2026 | $123.12 | $144.74 |
| Consolidated volume 07/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CZA | ONEV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CZA | ONEV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $124.47 | $146.91 |
| 1D performance | +1.10% | +1.50% |
| AuM | $187.90 M | $297.55 M |
| E/R | 0.69% | 0.2% |
Characteristics
CZA | ONEV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | State Street Investment Management |
| Benchmark | Zacks Mid-Cap Core Index | Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focused Factor Index |
| N° of holdings | 101 | 440 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 2, 2007 | December 2, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CZA
USA
84.13%
Other
15.87%
ONEV
USA
93.93%
Other
6.07%
Sectors
CZA
Finance
36.42%
Industrials
14.86%
Healthcare
13.46%
Utilities
10.55%
Consumer Services
8.21%
Technology
7.17%
Other
9.33%
ONEV
Finance
26.02%
Industrials
14.02%
Healthcare
12.09%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.87%
Utilities
7.99%
Other
31.01%
Diversification
CZA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
28.47%
ONEV
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
12.52%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
CZA
Flex Ltd.
2.47%
State Street Corp.
2.19%
Humana, Inc.
2.15%
Viking Holdings Ltd. (Bermuda)
2.10%
Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc.
1.98%
American International Group, Inc.
1.95%
Sysco Corp.
1.88%
PG&E Corp.
1.83%
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
1.81%
Prudential Financial, Inc.
1.77%
The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc.
1.74%
Huntington Bancshares, Inc.
1.70%
Roper Technologies, Inc.
1.69%
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
1.64%
Centene Corp.
1.59%
ONEV
The Allstate Corp.
1.46%
Progressive Corp.
1.23%
McKesson Corp.
0.95%
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
0.92%
The Cigna Group
0.87%
Cincinnati Financial Corp.
0.82%
The Travelers Cos., Inc.
0.79%
The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc.
0.75%
The Kroger Co.
0.74%
Comcast Corp.
0.73%
T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
0.70%
Simon Property Group, Inc.
0.69%
Elevance Health, Inc.
0.64%
Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.
0.63%
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.
0.60%
Frequently asked questions about CZA and ONEV
How have the CZA and ONEV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 24, 2026, CZA is up 12.38% year-to-date (YTD), while ONEV has returned 10.08%. That puts CZA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CZA or ONEV?
Year-to-date, the CZA ETF saw -$56M in flows, compared to -$299M for ONEV.
Which ETF is more volatile: CZA or ONEV?
Over the past year, CZA had a volatility of 12.62%, while ONEV experienced 11.39%.
Which ETF is bigger: CZA or ONEV?
As of July 24, 2026, CZA holds $187.90 M in assets under management (AUM), while ONEV manages $297.55 M.
What sectors do the CZA and ONEV ETFs invest in?
CZA leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Healthcare. Meanwhile, ONEV focuses on Finance, Industrials and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the CZA ETF and ONEV ETF?
CZA top holdings include Flex Ltd., State Street Corp. and Humana, Inc.. ONEV holds in its top three: The Allstate Corp., Progressive Corp. and McKesson Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: CZA or ONEV?
CZA holds 101 securities with 28.47% of its assets in the top 15. ONEV has 446 securities and a top 15 weight of 12.52%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
