CZAvsONEVETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
ONEV
State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF
This fund is part of
US Low Volatility
-0.63%
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. State Street SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) is part of the US Low Volatility segment. CZA's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Industrials. In contrast, ONEV's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Healthcare. CZA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.69%, versus 0.2% for ONEV. CZA is up 12% year-to-date (YTD) with -$65M in YTD flows. ONEV performs better with 13.95% YTD performance, and -$320M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CZA and ONEV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CZA vs ONEV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/23/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CZA ONEV | +3.28%+5.77% | +0.63%+3.80% | +12.00%+13.95% | +14.03%+14.35% | +60.27%+56.72% | +40.10%+50.15% |
| Flows | CZA ONEV | -$199K-$1M | -$9M-$21M | -$65M-$320M | -$28M-$345M | -$73M-$448M | -$99M-$475M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CZA ONEV | +9.67%+12.45% | +11.92%+11.68% | +14.38%+12.82% | +16.00%+14.81% |
| Max drawdown | CZA ONEV | -7.73%-8.20% | -9.18%-8.20% | -18.73%-14.90% | -18.73%-18.48% |
| Max drawdown duration | CZA ONEV | 68d60d | 97d60d | 373d254d | 373d566d |
Trading data
CZA | ONEV | |
Last sale 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM | $124.02 | $149.43 |
| Previous close 10/22/2026 | $124.79 | $150.88 |
| Consolidated volume 10/22/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CZA | ONEV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CZA | ONEV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $124.02 | $149.43 |
| 1D performance | -0.62% | -0.96% |
| AuM | $178.59 M | $285.50 M |
| E/R | 0.69% | 0.2% |
Characteristics
CZA | ONEV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | State Street Investment Management |
| Benchmark | Zacks Mid-Cap Core Index | Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focused Factor Index |
| N° of holdings | 100 | 437 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 2, 2007 | December 2, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CZA
USA
86.74%
Other
13.26%
ONEV
USA
94.07%
Other
5.93%
Sectors
CZA
Finance
36.36%
Healthcare
15.55%
Industrials
15.49%
Non-Energy Materi.
8.42%
Other
24.18%
ONEV
Finance
25.98%
Industrials
13.52%
Healthcare
12.93%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.84%
Utilities
7.04%
Other
31.7%
Advertisement
Diversification
CZA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
27.93%
ONEV
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
12.85%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
CZA
Becton, Dickinson & Co.
2.43%
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
2.05%
Prudential Financial, Inc.
2.04%
American International Group, Inc.
1.98%
IQVIA Holdings, Inc.
1.94%
Waste Connections, Inc.
1.92%
Sysco Corp.
1.89%
The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc.
1.83%
Venture Global, Inc.
1.80%
Credicorp Ltd.
1.74%
Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc.
1.74%
Royalty Pharma Plc
1.70%
Northern Trust Corp.
1.66%
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
1.64%
Trip.com Group Ltd.
1.59%
ONEV
The Allstate Corp.
1.52%
The Progressive Corp.
1.18%
McKesson Corp.
1.07%
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
0.90%
Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp.
0.87%
The Travelers Cos., Inc.
0.85%
The Cigna Group
0.84%
Comcast Corp.
0.78%
The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc.
0.75%
The Kroger Co.
0.74%
Cincinnati Financial Corp.
0.73%
Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.
0.70%
T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
0.66%
Quest Diagnostics, Inc.
0.64%
Simon Property Group, Inc.
0.63%
Frequently asked questions about CZA and ONEV
How have the CZA and ONEV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 23, 2026, CZA is up 12% year-to-date (YTD), while ONEV has returned 13.95%. That puts ONEV better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CZA or ONEV?
Year-to-date, the CZA ETF saw -$65M in flows, compared to -$320M for ONEV.
Which ETF is more volatile: CZA or ONEV?
Over the past year, CZA had a volatility of 11.92%, while ONEV experienced 11.68%.
Which ETF is bigger: CZA or ONEV?
As of October 23, 2026, CZA holds $178.59 M in assets under management (AUM), while ONEV manages $285.50 M.
What sectors do the CZA and ONEV ETFs invest in?
CZA leans toward sectors like Finance, Healthcare and Industrials. Meanwhile, ONEV focuses on Finance, Industrials and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the CZA ETF and ONEV ETF?
CZA top holdings include Becton, Dickinson & Co., Agilent Technologies, Inc. and Prudential Financial, Inc.. ONEV holds in its top three: The Allstate Corp., The Progressive Corp. and McKesson Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: CZA or ONEV?
CZA holds 100 securities with 27.93% of its assets in the top 15. ONEV has 443 securities and a top 15 weight of 12.85%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
