Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CZAvsNUMVETF Comparison
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. NuShares ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV) is part of the US Mid Cap Value segment. CZA's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Materials. In contrast, NUMV's top sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. CZA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.69%, versus 0.31% for NUMV. CZA is up 1.81% year-to-date (YTD) with -$42M in YTD flows. NUMV performs worse with 1.02% YTD performance, and -$12M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CZA and NUMV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CZA vs NUMV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CZA NUMV | -3.57%-3.94% | +1.78%+1.19% | +1.81%+1.02% | +10.31%+16.89% | +36.28%+48.12% | +48.16%+37.95% |
| Flows | CZA NUMV | --$12M | -$3M+$2M | -$42M-$12M | -$18M+$9M | -$67M-$26M | -$98M+$180M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CZA NUMV | +12.30%+12.84% | +17.64%+17.16% | +14.82%+15.23% | +16.05%+17.51% |
| Max drawdown | CZA NUMV | -4.74%-4.91% | -13.23%-12.51% | -18.73%-19.49% | -18.73%-25.58% |
| Max drawdown duration | CZA NUMV | 12d9d | 37d37d | 373d254d | 373d923d |
CZA | NUMV | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $112.41 | $39.34 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $112.65 | $39.48 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CZA | NUMV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CZA | NUMV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $112.41 | $39.34 |
| 1D performance | -0.22% | -0.35% |
| AuM | $183.76 M | $414.70 M |
| E/R | 0.69% | 0.31% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CZA and NUMV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, CZA is up 1.81% year-to-date (YTD), while NUMV has returned 1.02%. That puts CZA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CZA or NUMV?
Year-to-date, the CZA ETF saw -$42M in flows, compared to -$12M for NUMV.
Which ETF is more volatile: CZA or NUMV?
Over the past year, CZA had a volatility of 17.64%, while NUMV experienced 17.16%.
Which ETF is bigger: CZA or NUMV?
As of March 10, 2026, CZA holds $183.76 M in assets under management (AUM), while NUMV manages $414.70 M.
What sectors do the CZA and NUMV ETFs invest in?
CZA leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Materials. Meanwhile, NUMV focuses on Financials, Information Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the CZA ETF and NUMV ETF?
CZA top holdings include IQVIA HOLDINGS INC, NUCOR and WABTEC. NUMV holds in its top three: WESTERN DIGITAL, BAKER HUGHES and ECHOSTAR.
Which ETF is more diversified: CZA or NUMV?
CZA holds 101 securities with 28.8% of its assets in the top 15. NUMV has 94 securities and a top 15 weight of 31.14%.
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.