BROUGHT TO YOU BY:

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

CZAvsNUMVETF Comparison

ETF 1

CZA

Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF

This fund is part of

US Multi-Factor

-0.13%

Full CZA fund page

VS

ETF 2

NUMV

NuShares ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF

This fund is part of

US Mid Cap Value

+0.96%

Full NUMV fund page

Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. NuShares ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF (NUMV) is part of the US Mid Cap Value segment. CZA's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Healthcare. In contrast, NUMV's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Technology. CZA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.69%, versus 0.31% for NUMV. CZA is up 12.38% year-to-date (YTD) with -$56M in YTD flows. NUMV performs worse with 11.91% YTD performance, and -$32M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CZA and NUMV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios

CZA vs NUMV performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Data Services

Historic performance and flows

Data as of 07/24/2026

		1M	3M	YTD	1Y	3Y	5Y
Perf.	CZA NUMV	+2.96%+2.54%	+7.17%+6.06%	+12.38%+11.91%	+16.42%+19.24%	+41.17%+50.25%	+45.36%+44.08%
Flows	CZA NUMV	-$1M-$15M	-$9M-$16M	-$56M-$32M	-$23M-$17M	-$74M-$42M	-$97M+$112M

Volatility and drawdown

		3M	1Y	3Y	5Y
Volatility	CZA NUMV	+10.79%+10.96%	+12.62%+12.43%	+14.60%+14.84%	+16.04%+17.36%
Max drawdown	CZA NUMV	-2.82%-2.28%	-9.18%-8.63%	-18.73%-19.49%	-18.73%-25.58%
Max drawdown duration	CZA NUMV	28d15d	97d64d	373d254d	373d923d

Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free

	CZA	NUMV
Last sale 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM	$124.47	$44.26
Previous close 07/23/2026	$123.12	$43.75
Consolidated volume 07/23/2026
Average volume 30 days
Average discount or premium 30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days

Replication quality

Data as of June 30, 2026

1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free

	CZA	NUMV
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst

Main metrics

Last update 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM

Live

Closed

	CZA	NUMV
Last price	$124.47	$44.26
1D performance	+1.10%	+1.17%
AuM	$187.90 M	$439.71 M
E/R	0.69%	0.31%

Characteristics

	CZA	NUMV
Management strategy	Passive	Passive
Provider	Invesco	Nuveen
Benchmark	Zacks Mid-Cap Core Index	MSCI TIAA ESG USA Mid-Cap Value Index
N° of holdings	101	94
Asset class	Equities	Equities
Trailing 12m distribution yield	Join	Join
Inception date	April 2, 2007	December 13, 2016
ESG	No	Yes

More CZA data on Trackinsight

More NUMV data on Trackinsight

Exposure

Countries

CZA

USA

84.13%

Other

15.87%

NUMV

USA

92.62%

Other

7.38%

Sectors

CZA

Finance

36.42%

Industrials

14.86%

Healthcare

13.46%

Utilities

10.55%

Consumer Services

8.21%

Technology

7.17%

Other

9.33%

NUMV

Finance

27.13%

Industrials

19.04%

Technology

10.65%

Healthcare

9.12%

Non-Energy Materi.

7.51%

Other

26.55%

Diversification

CZA

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

28.47%

NUMV

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

30.53%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of June 30, 2026

CZA

Flex Ltd.

2.47%

State Street Corp.

2.19%

Humana, Inc.

2.15%

Viking Holdings Ltd. (Bermuda)

2.10%

Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc.

1.98%

American International Group, Inc.

1.95%

Sysco Corp.

1.88%

PG&E Corp.

1.83%

Agilent Technologies, Inc.

1.81%

Prudential Financial, Inc.

1.77%

The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc.

1.74%

Huntington Bancshares, Inc.

1.70%

Roper Technologies, Inc.

1.69%

Arch Capital Group Ltd.

1.64%

Centene Corp.

1.59%

NUMV

United Rentals, Inc.

2.73%

Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.

2.72%

Cardinal Health, Inc.

2.41%

Yum! Brands, Inc.

2.04%

Sysco Corp.

2.04%

Baker Hughes Co.

2.00%

Consolidated Edison, Inc.

1.95%

Prudential Financial, Inc.

1.94%

PPG Industries, Inc.

1.90%

Xylem, Inc.

1.84%

Ferguson Enterprises, Inc.

1.82%

Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.

1.80%

Regions Financial Corp.

1.80%

Steel Dynamics, Inc.

1.79%

CenterPoint Energy, Inc.

1.75%

Frequently asked questions about CZA and NUMV

How have the CZA and NUMV ETFs performed in 2026?

As of July 24, 2026, CZA is up 12.38% year-to-date (YTD), while NUMV has returned 11.91%. That puts CZA better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CZA or NUMV?

Year-to-date, the CZA ETF saw -$56M in flows, compared to -$32M for NUMV.

Which ETF is more volatile: CZA or NUMV?

Over the past year, CZA had a volatility of 12.62%, while NUMV experienced 12.43%.

Which ETF is bigger: CZA or NUMV?

As of July 24, 2026, CZA holds $187.90 M in assets under management (AUM), while NUMV manages $439.71 M.

What sectors do the CZA and NUMV ETFs invest in?

CZA leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Healthcare. Meanwhile, NUMV focuses on Finance, Industrials and Technology.

What are the top holdings of the CZA ETF and NUMV ETF?

CZA top holdings include Flex Ltd., State Street Corp. and Humana, Inc.. NUMV holds in its top three: United Rentals, Inc., Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. and Cardinal Health, Inc..

CZAvsNUMVETF Comparison

Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF

NuShares ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF

CZA vs NUMV performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Countries

Sectors

Diversification

Top 15 holdings

How have the CZA and NUMV ETFs performed in 2026?

As of July 24, 2026, CZA is up 12.38% year-to-date (YTD), while NUMV has returned 11.91%. That puts CZA better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CZA or NUMV?

Year-to-date, the CZA ETF saw -$56M in flows, compared to -$32M for NUMV.

Which ETF is more volatile: CZA or NUMV?

Over the past year, CZA had a volatility of 12.62%, while NUMV experienced 12.43%.

Which ETF is bigger: CZA or NUMV?

As of July 24, 2026, CZA holds $187.90 M in assets under management (AUM), while NUMV manages $439.71 M.

What sectors do the CZA and NUMV ETFs invest in?

CZA leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Healthcare. Meanwhile, NUMV focuses on Finance, Industrials and Technology.

What are the top holdings of the CZA ETF and NUMV ETF?

CZA top holdings include Flex Ltd., State Street Corp. and Humana, Inc.. NUMV holds in its top three: United Rentals, Inc., Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. and Cardinal Health, Inc..

Which ETF is more diversified: CZA or NUMV?

CZA holds 101 securities with 28.47% of its assets in the top 15. NUMV has 94 securities and a top 15 weight of 30.53%.

Expert-Built ETF Portfolios, All in One Place