BROUGHT TO YOU BY:

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

CZAvsMMIDETF Comparison

ETF 1

CZA

Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF

This fund is part of

US Multi-Factor

-0.41%

Full CZA fund page

VS

ETF 2

MMID

MFS Active Mid Cap ETF

This fund is part of

Uncategorized Equities

-0.26%

Full MMID fund page

Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. MFS Active Mid Cap ETF (MMID) is part of the Uncategorized Equities segment. CZA's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Industrials. In contrast, MMID's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Industrials. CZA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.69%, versus 0.59% for MMID. CZA is up 12% year-to-date (YTD) with -$65M in YTD flows. MMID performs worse with 9.48% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CZA and MMID below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios

CZA vs MMID performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Data Services

Historic performance and flows

Data as of 10/23/2026

		1M	3M	YTD	1Y	3Y	5Y
Perf.	CZA MMID	+3.28%+3.96%	+0.63%+3.49%	+12.00%+9.48%	+14.03%+9.11%	+60.27%n/a	+40.10%n/a
Flows	CZA MMID	-$199K+$788K	-$9M+$788K	-$65M+$2M	-$28M+$8M	-$73M-	-$99M-

Volatility and drawdown

		3M	1Y	3Y	5Y
Volatility	CZA MMID	+9.67%+11.22%	+11.92%+12.53%	+14.38%n/a	+16.00%n/a
Max drawdown	CZA MMID	-7.73%-7.95%	-9.18%-7.98%	-18.73%n/a	-18.73%n/a
Max drawdown duration	CZA MMID	68d71d	97d136d	373dn/a	373dn/a

Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free

	CZA	MMID
Last sale 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM	$124.02	$27.16
Previous close 10/23/2026	$124.79	$27.32
Consolidated volume 10/23/2026
Average volume 30 days
Average discount or premium 30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days

Replication quality

Data as of September 30, 2026

1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

MMID

is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an index

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free

	CZA	MMID
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst

Main metrics

Last update 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM

Live

Closed

	CZA	MMID
Last price	$124.02	$27.16
1D performance	-0.62%	-0.60%
AuM	$178.59 M	$36.93 M
E/R	0.69%	0.59%

Characteristics

	CZA	MMID
Management strategy	Passive	Active
Provider	Invesco	MFS
Benchmark	Zacks Mid-Cap Core Index	-
N° of holdings	100	105
Asset class	Equities	-
Trailing 12m distribution yield	Join	Join
Inception date	April 2, 2007	September 24, 2025
ESG	No	No

More CZA data on Trackinsight

More MMID data on Trackinsight

Exposure

Countries

CZA

USA

86.74%

Other

13.26%

MMID

USA

84.79%

Other

15.21%

Sectors

CZA

Finance

36.36%

Healthcare

15.55%

Industrials

15.49%

Non-Energy Materi.

8.42%

Other

24.18%

MMID

Finance

20.41%

Technology

15%

Industrials

14.33%

Healthcare

11.83%

Non-Energy Materi.

7.48%

Energy

7.08%

Other

23.87%

Diversification

CZA

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

27.93%

MMID

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

22.04%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of August 31, 2026

CZA

Becton, Dickinson & Co.

2.43%

Agilent Technologies, Inc.

2.05%

Prudential Financial, Inc.

2.04%

American International Group, Inc.

1.98%

IQVIA Holdings, Inc.

1.94%

Waste Connections, Inc.

1.92%

Sysco Corp.

1.89%

The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc.

1.83%

Venture Global, Inc.

1.80%

Credicorp Ltd.

1.74%

Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc.

1.74%

Royalty Pharma Plc

1.70%

Northern Trust Corp.

1.66%

Arch Capital Group Ltd.

1.64%

Trip.com Group Ltd.

1.59%

MMID

Global Payments, Inc.

1.85%

Cheniere Energy, Inc.

1.71%

Waters Corp.

1.65%

Becton, Dickinson & Co.

1.62%

Diamondback Energy, Inc.

1.62%

Agilent Technologies, Inc.

1.49%

Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp.

1.45%

W.W. Grainger, Inc.

1.44%

Valero Energy Corp.

1.43%

STERIS Plc (Ireland)

1.43%

Permian Resources Corp.

1.32%

M&T Bank Corp.

1.29%

Kenvue, Inc.

1.25%

Assurant, Inc.

1.24%

Snowflake, Inc.

1.23%

Frequently asked questions about CZA and MMID

How have the CZA and MMID ETFs performed in 2026?

As of October 23, 2026, CZA is up 12% year-to-date (YTD), while MMID has returned 9.48%. That puts CZA better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CZA or MMID?

Year-to-date, the CZA ETF saw -$65M in flows, compared to +$2M for MMID.

Which ETF is more volatile: CZA or MMID?

Over the past year, CZA had a volatility of 11.92%, while MMID experienced 12.53%.

Which ETF is bigger: CZA or MMID?

As of October 23, 2026, CZA holds $178.59 M in assets under management (AUM), while MMID manages $36.93 M.

What sectors do the CZA and MMID ETFs invest in?

CZA leans toward sectors like Finance, Healthcare and Industrials. Meanwhile, MMID focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.

What are the top holdings of the CZA ETF and MMID ETF?

CZA top holdings include Becton, Dickinson & Co., Agilent Technologies, Inc. and Prudential Financial, Inc.. MMID holds in its top three: Global Payments, Inc., Cheniere Energy, Inc. and Waters Corp..

CZAvsMMIDETF Comparison

Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF

MFS Active Mid Cap ETF

CZA vs MMID performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Countries

Sectors

Diversification

Top 15 holdings

How have the CZA and MMID ETFs performed in 2026?

As of October 23, 2026, CZA is up 12% year-to-date (YTD), while MMID has returned 9.48%. That puts CZA better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CZA or MMID?

Year-to-date, the CZA ETF saw -$65M in flows, compared to +$2M for MMID.

Which ETF is more volatile: CZA or MMID?

Over the past year, CZA had a volatility of 11.92%, while MMID experienced 12.53%.

Which ETF is bigger: CZA or MMID?

As of October 23, 2026, CZA holds $178.59 M in assets under management (AUM), while MMID manages $36.93 M.

What sectors do the CZA and MMID ETFs invest in?

CZA leans toward sectors like Finance, Healthcare and Industrials. Meanwhile, MMID focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.

What are the top holdings of the CZA ETF and MMID ETF?

CZA top holdings include Becton, Dickinson & Co., Agilent Technologies, Inc. and Prudential Financial, Inc.. MMID holds in its top three: Global Payments, Inc., Cheniere Energy, Inc. and Waters Corp..

Which ETF is more diversified: CZA or MMID?

CZA holds 100 securities with 27.93% of its assets in the top 15. MMID has 105 securities and a top 15 weight of 22.04%.

ETFs’ Next Act: From Access to Selection