Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CZAvsMDYVETF Comparison
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. SPDR S&P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF (MDYV) is part of the US Mid Cap Value segment. CZA's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Materials. In contrast, MDYV's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. CZA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.69%, versus 0.15% for MDYV. CZA is down -0.05% year-to-date (YTD) with -$42M in YTD flows. MDYV performs worse with -0.49% YTD performance, and -$53M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CZA and MDYV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CZA vs MDYV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CZA MDYV | -4.44%-7.28% | -0.79%-2.02% | -0.05%-0.49% | +10.07%+12.32% | +36.87%+39.45% | +43.39%+38.03% |
| Flows | CZA MDYV | --$4M | -$3M-$36M | -$42M-$53M | -$19M-$231M | -$67M-$984M | -$98M-$1M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CZA MDYV | +12.47%+15.15% | +17.67%+20.60% | +14.78%+18.26% | +16.06%+19.59% |
| Max drawdown | CZA MDYV | -6.49%-8.94% | -13.23%-15.15% | -18.73%-22.46% | -18.73%-22.46% |
| Max drawdown duration | CZA MDYV | 14d32d | 37d52d | 373d379d | 373d379d |
CZA | MDYV | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 7:35 PM | $110.66 | $84.22 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $112.41 | $84.27 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CZA | MDYV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CZA | MDYV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $110.66 | $84.22 |
| 1D performance | -1.56% | -0.06% |
| AuM | $180.40 M | $2.38 B |
| E/R | 0.69% | 0.15% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CZA and MDYV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, CZA is down -0.05% year-to-date (YTD), while MDYV has lost -0.49%. That puts CZA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CZA or MDYV?
Year-to-date, the CZA ETF saw -$42M in flows, compared to -$53M for MDYV.
Which ETF is more volatile: CZA or MDYV?
Over the past year, CZA had a volatility of 17.67%, while MDYV experienced 20.6%.
Which ETF is bigger: CZA or MDYV?
As of March 12, 2026, CZA holds $180.40 M in assets under management (AUM), while MDYV manages $2.38 B.
What sectors do the CZA and MDYV ETFs invest in?
CZA leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Materials. Meanwhile, MDYV focuses on Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the CZA ETF and MDYV ETF?
CZA top holdings include IQVIA HOLDINGS INC, NUCOR and WABTEC. MDYV holds in its top three: US FOODS HOLDING CORP, RELIANCE STEEL and JONES LANG LASALLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: CZA or MDYV?
CZA holds 101 securities with 28.8% of its assets in the top 15. MDYV has 306 securities and a top 15 weight of 13.29%.
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.