CZAvsJHMMETF Comparison
VS
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA) and John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. CZA's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Healthcare. In contrast, JHMM's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Technology. CZA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.69%, versus 0.42% for JHMM. CZA is up 12.38% year-to-date (YTD) with -$56M in YTD flows. JHMM performs better with 13.22% YTD performance, and +$714M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CZA and JHMM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CZA vs JHMM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CZA JHMM | +2.96%+0.01% | +7.17%+3.51% | +12.38%+13.22% | +16.42%+18.79% | +41.17%+48.99% | +45.36%+49.71% |
| Flows | CZA JHMM | -$1M+$217M | -$9M+$463M | -$56M+$714M | -$23M+$889M | -$74M+$1.03B | -$97M+$2.02B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CZA JHMM | +10.79%+13.26% | +12.62%+14.19% | +14.60%+16.28% | +16.04%+18.22% |
| Max drawdown | CZA JHMM | -2.82%-3.63% | -9.18%-8.57% | -18.73%-21.83% | -18.73%-24.10% |
| Max drawdown duration | CZA JHMM | 28d16d | 97d49d | 373d269d | 373d835d |
Trading data
CZA | JHMM | |
Last sale 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM | $124.47 | $73.91 |
| Previous close 07/23/2026 | $123.12 | $73.62 |
| Consolidated volume 07/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CZA | JHMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CZA | JHMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $124.47 | $73.91 |
| 1D performance | +1.10% | +0.39% |
| AuM | $187.90 M | $5.91 B |
| E/R | 0.69% | 0.42% |
Characteristics
CZA | JHMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | John Hancock Investments |
| Benchmark | Zacks Mid-Cap Core Index | John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 101 | 652 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 2, 2007 | September 28, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CZA
USA
84.13%
Other
15.87%
JHMM
USA
95.05%
Other
4.95%
Sectors
CZA
Finance
36.42%
Industrials
14.86%
Healthcare
13.46%
Utilities
10.55%
Consumer Services
8.21%
Technology
7.17%
Other
9.33%
JHMM
Finance
21.57%
Industrials
17.39%
Technology
16.19%
Healthcare
10.56%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.88%
Other
26.42%
Advertisement
Diversification
CZA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
28.47%
JHMM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
8.43%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
CZA
Flex Ltd.
2.47%
State Street Corp.
2.19%
Humana, Inc.
2.15%
Viking Holdings Ltd. (Bermuda)
2.10%
Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc.
1.98%
American International Group, Inc.
1.95%
Sysco Corp.
1.88%
PG&E Corp.
1.83%
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
1.81%
Prudential Financial, Inc.
1.77%
The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc.
1.74%
Huntington Bancshares, Inc.
1.70%
Roper Technologies, Inc.
1.69%
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
1.64%
Centene Corp.
1.59%
JHMM
Flex Ltd.
0.86%
Coherent Corp.
0.68%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
0.65%
Teradyne, Inc.
0.63%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.
0.63%
Keysight Technologies, Inc.
0.60%
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
0.54%
Targa Resources Corp.
0.53%
Ciena Corp.
0.52%
MKS, Inc.
0.51%
AMETEK, Inc.
0.47%
Rockwell Automation, Inc.
0.46%
Entergy Corp.
0.46%
Fifth Third Bancorp
0.46%
eBay, Inc.
0.45%
Frequently asked questions about CZA and JHMM
How have the CZA and JHMM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 24, 2026, CZA is up 12.38% year-to-date (YTD), while JHMM has returned 13.22%. That puts JHMM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CZA or JHMM?
Year-to-date, the CZA ETF saw -$56M in flows, compared to +$714M for JHMM.
Which ETF is more volatile: CZA or JHMM?
Over the past year, CZA had a volatility of 12.62%, while JHMM experienced 14.19%.
Which ETF is bigger: CZA or JHMM?
As of July 24, 2026, CZA holds $187.90 M in assets under management (AUM), while JHMM manages $5.91 B.
What sectors do the CZA and JHMM ETFs invest in?
CZA leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Healthcare. Meanwhile, JHMM focuses on Finance, Industrials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the CZA ETF and JHMM ETF?
CZA top holdings include Flex Ltd., State Street Corp. and Humana, Inc.. JHMM holds in its top three: Flex Ltd., Coherent Corp. and Comfort Systems USA, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CZA or JHMM?
CZA holds 101 securities with 28.47% of its assets in the top 15. JHMM has 661 securities and a top 15 weight of 8.43%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
