CZAvsJHMMETF Comparison
VS
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA) and John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. CZA's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Industrials. In contrast, JHMM's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Technology. CZA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.69%, versus 0.42% for JHMM. CZA is up 12.74% year-to-date (YTD) with -$65M in YTD flows. JHMM performs worse with 12.26% YTD performance, and +$857M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CZA and JHMM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CZA vs JHMM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/22/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CZA JHMM | +3.35%+0.26% | +1.27%-0.89% | +12.74%+12.26% | +15.76%+14.85% | +61.32%+67.98% | +41.16%+40.73% |
| Flows | CZA JHMM | -$1M+$2M | -$9M+$158M | -$65M+$857M | -$28M+$948M | -$73M+$1.04B | -$99M+$2.08B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CZA JHMM | +9.58%+11.35% | +11.93%+13.82% | +14.38%+16.13% | +16.00%+18.20% |
| Max drawdown | CZA JHMM | -7.73%-7.57% | -9.18%-8.57% | -18.73%-21.83% | -18.73%-24.10% |
| Max drawdown duration | CZA JHMM | 67d67d | 97d49d | 373d269d | 373d835d |
Trading data
CZA | JHMM | |
Last sale 10/22/2026 at 1:30 PM | $124.79 | $73.25 |
| Previous close 10/22/2026 | $123.17 | $73.39 |
| Consolidated volume 10/22/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CZA | JHMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/22/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CZA | JHMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $124.79 | $73.25 |
| 1D performance | +1.32% | -0.19% |
| AuM | $179.77 M | $6.00 B |
| E/R | 0.69% | 0.42% |
Characteristics
CZA | JHMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | John Hancock Investments |
| Benchmark | Zacks Mid-Cap Core Index | John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 100 | 649 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 2, 2007 | September 28, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CZA
USA
86.74%
Other
13.26%
JHMM
USA
95.28%
Other
4.72%
Sectors
CZA
Finance
36.36%
Healthcare
15.55%
Industrials
15.49%
Non-Energy Materi.
8.42%
Other
24.18%
JHMM
Finance
22.46%
Industrials
15.56%
Technology
15.55%
Healthcare
11.86%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.82%
Other
26.76%
Advertisement
Diversification
CZA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
27.93%
JHMM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
7.55%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
CZA
Becton, Dickinson & Co.
2.43%
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
2.05%
Prudential Financial, Inc.
2.04%
American International Group, Inc.
1.98%
IQVIA Holdings, Inc.
1.94%
Waste Connections, Inc.
1.92%
Sysco Corp.
1.89%
The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc.
1.83%
Venture Global, Inc.
1.80%
Credicorp Ltd.
1.74%
Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc.
1.74%
Royalty Pharma Plc
1.70%
Northern Trust Corp.
1.66%
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
1.64%
Trip.com Group Ltd.
1.59%
JHMM
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.
0.73%
Flex Ltd.
0.58%
Targa Resources Corp.
0.56%
Keysight Technologies, Inc.
0.53%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
0.51%
State Street Corp.
0.49%
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
0.48%
Coherent Corp.
0.48%
Teradyne, Inc.
0.48%
AMETEK, Inc.
0.47%
Devon Energy Corp.
0.46%
Lumentum Holdings, Inc.
0.45%
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp.
0.44%
Fifth Third Bancorp
0.44%
The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc.
0.44%
Frequently asked questions about CZA and JHMM
How have the CZA and JHMM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 22, 2026, CZA is up 12.74% year-to-date (YTD), while JHMM has returned 12.26%. That puts CZA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CZA or JHMM?
Year-to-date, the CZA ETF saw -$65M in flows, compared to +$857M for JHMM.
Which ETF is more volatile: CZA or JHMM?
Over the past year, CZA had a volatility of 11.93%, while JHMM experienced 13.82%.
Which ETF is bigger: CZA or JHMM?
As of October 22, 2026, CZA holds $179.77 M in assets under management (AUM), while JHMM manages $6.00 B.
What sectors do the CZA and JHMM ETFs invest in?
CZA leans toward sectors like Finance, Healthcare and Industrials. Meanwhile, JHMM focuses on Finance, Industrials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the CZA ETF and JHMM ETF?
CZA top holdings include Becton, Dickinson & Co., Agilent Technologies, Inc. and Prudential Financial, Inc.. JHMM holds in its top three: Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., Flex Ltd. and Targa Resources Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: CZA or JHMM?
CZA holds 100 securities with 27.93% of its assets in the top 15. JHMM has 655 securities and a top 15 weight of 7.55%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
