BROUGHT TO YOU BY:

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

CZAvsIWSETF Comparison

ETF 1

CZA

Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF

This fund is part of

US Multi-Factor

-0.35%

Full CZA fund page

VS

ETF 2

IWS

iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF

This fund is part of

US Mid Cap Value

-0.52%

Full IWS fund page

Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) is part of the US Mid Cap Value segment. CZA's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Industrials. In contrast, IWS's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Healthcare. CZA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.69%, versus 0.23% for IWS. CZA is up 12% year-to-date (YTD) with -$65M in YTD flows. IWS performs better with 20.61% YTD performance, and -$1.33B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CZA and IWS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios

CZA vs IWS performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Data Services

Historic performance and flows

Data as of 10/23/2026

		1M	3M	YTD	1Y	3Y	5Y
Perf.	CZA IWS	+3.28%+2.99%	+0.63%+2.51%	+12.00%+20.61%	+14.03%+22.09%	+60.27%+77.70%	+40.10%+51.81%
Flows	CZA IWS	-$199K+$171M	-$9M-$125M	-$65M-$1.33B	-$28M-$1.15B	-$73M-$2.73B	-$99M-$3.75B

Volatility and drawdown

		3M	1Y	3Y	5Y
Volatility	CZA IWS	+9.67%+10.82%	+11.92%+13.01%	+14.38%+15.17%	+16.00%+17.23%
Max drawdown	CZA IWS	-7.73%-6.99%	-9.18%-7.51%	-18.73%-20.45%	-18.73%-21.32%
Max drawdown duration	CZA IWS	68d68d	97d44d	373d269d	373d785d

Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free

	CZA	IWS
Last sale 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM	$124.02	$168.43
Previous close 10/22/2026	$124.79	$169.21
Consolidated volume 10/22/2026
Average volume 30 days
Average discount or premium 30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days

Replication quality

Data as of September 30, 2026

1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free

	CZA	IWS
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst

Main metrics

Last update 10/23/2026 at 1:30 PM

Live

Closed

	CZA	IWS
Last price	$124.02	$168.43
1D performance	-0.62%	-0.46%
AuM	$178.59 M	$15.64 B
E/R	0.69%	0.23%

Characteristics

	CZA	IWS
Management strategy	Passive	Passive
Provider	Invesco	iShares
Benchmark	Zacks Mid-Cap Core Index	Russell Midcap Value Index
N° of holdings	100	705
Asset class	Equities	Equities
Trailing 12m distribution yield	Join	Join
Inception date	April 2, 2007	July 17, 2001
ESG	No	No

More CZA data on Trackinsight

More IWS data on Trackinsight

Exposure

Countries

CZA

USA

86.74%

Other

13.26%

IWS

USA

95.98%

Other

4.02%

Sectors

CZA

Finance

36.36%

Healthcare

15.55%

Industrials

15.49%

Non-Energy Materi.

8.42%

Other

24.18%

IWS

Finance

25.94%

Industrials

12.85%

Healthcare

11.09%

Technology

10.65%

Non-Energy Materi.

7.96%

Energy

7.51%

Other

24%

Diversification

CZA

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

27.93%

IWS

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

9.01%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of August 31, 2026

CZA

Becton, Dickinson & Co.

2.43%

Agilent Technologies, Inc.

2.05%

Prudential Financial, Inc.

2.04%

American International Group, Inc.

1.98%

IQVIA Holdings, Inc.

1.94%

Waste Connections, Inc.

1.92%

Sysco Corp.

1.89%

The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc.

1.83%

Venture Global, Inc.

1.80%

Credicorp Ltd.

1.74%

Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc.

1.74%

Royalty Pharma Plc

1.70%

Northern Trust Corp.

1.66%

Arch Capital Group Ltd.

1.64%

Trip.com Group Ltd.

1.59%

IWS

Phillips 66

0.89%

Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.

0.66%

Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.

0.66%

Digital Realty Trust, Inc.

0.64%

The Allstate Corp.

0.64%

Baker Hughes Co.

0.61%

Kinder Morgan, Inc.

0.60%

ONEOK, Inc.

0.58%

Realty Income Corp.

0.55%

Cheniere Energy, Inc.

0.55%

Corteva, Inc.

0.55%

Nucor Corp.

0.53%

Devon Energy Corp.

0.52%

Ford Motor Co.

0.52%

Marathon Petroleum Corp.

0.52%

Frequently asked questions about CZA and IWS

How have the CZA and IWS ETFs performed in 2026?

As of October 23, 2026, CZA is up 12% year-to-date (YTD), while IWS has returned 20.61%. That puts IWS better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CZA or IWS?

Year-to-date, the CZA ETF saw -$65M in flows, compared to -$1.33B for IWS.

Which ETF is more volatile: CZA or IWS?

Over the past year, CZA had a volatility of 11.92%, while IWS experienced 13.01%.

Which ETF is bigger: CZA or IWS?

As of October 23, 2026, CZA holds $178.59 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWS manages $15.64 B.

What sectors do the CZA and IWS ETFs invest in?

CZA leans toward sectors like Finance, Healthcare and Industrials. Meanwhile, IWS focuses on Finance, Industrials and Healthcare.

What are the top holdings of the CZA ETF and IWS ETF?

CZA top holdings include Becton, Dickinson & Co., Agilent Technologies, Inc. and Prudential Financial, Inc.. IWS holds in its top three: Phillips 66, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. and Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc..

CZAvsIWSETF Comparison

Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF

iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF

CZA vs IWS performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Countries

Sectors

Diversification

Top 15 holdings

How have the CZA and IWS ETFs performed in 2026?

As of October 23, 2026, CZA is up 12% year-to-date (YTD), while IWS has returned 20.61%. That puts IWS better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CZA or IWS?

Year-to-date, the CZA ETF saw -$65M in flows, compared to -$1.33B for IWS.

Which ETF is more volatile: CZA or IWS?

Over the past year, CZA had a volatility of 11.92%, while IWS experienced 13.01%.

Which ETF is bigger: CZA or IWS?

As of October 23, 2026, CZA holds $178.59 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWS manages $15.64 B.

What sectors do the CZA and IWS ETFs invest in?

CZA leans toward sectors like Finance, Healthcare and Industrials. Meanwhile, IWS focuses on Finance, Industrials and Healthcare.

What are the top holdings of the CZA ETF and IWS ETF?

CZA top holdings include Becton, Dickinson & Co., Agilent Technologies, Inc. and Prudential Financial, Inc.. IWS holds in its top three: Phillips 66, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co. and Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc..

Which ETF is more diversified: CZA or IWS?

CZA holds 100 securities with 27.93% of its assets in the top 15. IWS has 714 securities and a top 15 weight of 9.01%.

ETFs’ Next Act: From Access to Selection