BROUGHT TO YOU BY:

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

ETF Portfolio Builder

New

CZAvsIWSETF Comparison

ETF 1

CZA

Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF

This fund is part of

US Multi-Factor

+0.09%

Full CZA fund page

VS

ETF 2

IWS

iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF

This fund is part of

US Mid Cap Value

+0.87%

Full IWS fund page

Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) is part of the US Mid Cap Value segment. CZA's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Health Care. In contrast, IWS's top sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. CZA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.69%, versus 0.23% for IWS. CZA is up 7.86% year-to-date (YTD) with -$53M in YTD flows. IWS performs better with 14.23% YTD performance, and -$906M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CZA and IWS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios

CZA vs IWS performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Data Services

Historic performance and flows

Data as of 06/09/2026

		1M	3M	YTD	1Y	3Y	5Y
Perf.	CZA IWS	+2.41%+1.27%	+5.16%+8.37%	+7.86%+14.23%	+14.89%+25.42%	+43.15%+58.21%	+40.85%+48.96%
Flows	CZA IWS	-$6M+$64M	-$12M-$529M	-$53M-$906M	-$26M-$835M	-$73M-$2.56B	-$95M-$3.35B

Volatility and drawdown

		3M	1Y	3Y	5Y
Volatility	CZA IWS	+14.14%+14.31%	+12.85%+13.32%	+14.60%+15.35%	+16.13%+17.34%
Max drawdown	CZA IWS	-5.36%-3.95%	-9.18%-7.51%	-18.73%-20.45%	-18.73%-21.32%
Max drawdown duration	CZA IWS	29d29d	97d44d	373d269d	373d785d

Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free

	CZA	IWS
Last sale 6/9/2026 at 7:09 PM	$119.38	$159.53
Previous close 06/09/2026	$117.83	$160.53
Consolidated volume 06/09/2026
Average volume 30 days
Average discount or premium 30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days

Replication quality

Data as of May 29, 2026

1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free

	CZA	IWS
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst

Main metrics

Last update 6/9/2026 at 7:09 PM

Live

Closed

	CZA	IWS
Last price	$119.38	$159.53
1D performance	+1.31%	-0.62%
AuM	$182.74 M	$15.33 B
E/R	0.69%	0.23%

Characteristics

	CZA	IWS
Management strategy	Passive	Passive
Provider	Invesco	iShares
Benchmark	Zacks Mid-Cap Core Index	Russell Midcap Value Index
N° of holdings	92	636
Asset class	Equities	Equities
Trailing 12m distribution yield	Join	Join
Inception date	April 2, 2007	July 17, 2001
ESG	No	No

More CZA data on Trackinsight

More IWS data on Trackinsight

Exposure

Countries

CZA

USA

85.19%

Other

14.81%

IWS

USA

93.95%

Other

6.05%

Sectors

CZA

Financials

23.68%

Industrials

13.67%

Health Care

10.03%

Information Techn.

9.95%

Utilities

9.6%

Real Estate

9.59%

Other

23.48%

IWS

Industrials

15.63%

Financials

13.64%

Information Techn.

13.19%

Real Estate

8.04%

Energy

7.82%

Consumer Discreti.

7.67%

Other

34.01%

Diversification

CZA

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

27.14%

IWS

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

12.25%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of April 30, 2026

CZA

STATE STREET

2.10%

AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP

2.01%

PUBLIC SRVCE ENT

1.99%

HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GRUP

1.87%

LAS VEGAS SNDS

1.87%

ROPER TECHNOLOGIES INC

1.85%

PG&E

1.81%

SYSCO

1.79%

US89677Q1076

1.78%

BMG93A5A1010

1.73%

FISERV

1.70%

ARCH CAPITAL GROUP

1.70%

HUNTINGTON BANCSHARES

1.66%

PRUDENTIAL FINL

1.64%

AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES

1.62%

IWS

US80004C2008

1.49%

WESTERN DIGITAL

1.40%

CORNING

1.22%

CUMMINS

0.88%

BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON

0.81%

VALERO ENERGY

0.73%

MARATHON PETROLEUM

0.71%

CIENA

0.71%

DIGITAL REALTY REIT

0.66%

BAKER HUGHES

0.66%

PHILLIPS 66

0.64%

KINDER MORGAN

0.61%

WARNER BROS. DISCOVERY

0.60%

UNITED RENTALS

0.58%

KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES

0.57%

Frequently asked questions about CZA and IWS

How have the CZA and IWS ETFs performed in 2026?

As of June 9, 2026, CZA is up 7.86% year-to-date (YTD), while IWS has returned 14.23%. That puts IWS better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CZA or IWS?

Year-to-date, the CZA ETF saw -$53M in flows, compared to -$906M for IWS.

Which ETF is more volatile: CZA or IWS?

Over the past year, CZA had a volatility of 12.85%, while IWS experienced 13.32%.

Which ETF is bigger: CZA or IWS?

As of June 9, 2026, CZA holds $182.74 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWS manages $15.33 B.

What sectors do the CZA and IWS ETFs invest in?

CZA leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Health Care. Meanwhile, IWS focuses on Industrials, Financials and Information Technology.

What are the top holdings of the CZA ETF and IWS ETF?

CZA top holdings include STATE STREET, AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP and PUBLIC SRVCE ENT. IWS holds in its top three: US80004C2008, WESTERN DIGITAL and CORNING.

CZAvsIWSETF Comparison

Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF

iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF

CZA vs IWS performance and flow charts

Performance

Cumulative Flows

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Countries

Sectors

Diversification

Top 15 holdings

How have the CZA and IWS ETFs performed in 2026?

As of June 9, 2026, CZA is up 7.86% year-to-date (YTD), while IWS has returned 14.23%. That puts IWS better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CZA or IWS?

Year-to-date, the CZA ETF saw -$53M in flows, compared to -$906M for IWS.

Which ETF is more volatile: CZA or IWS?

Over the past year, CZA had a volatility of 12.85%, while IWS experienced 13.32%.

Which ETF is bigger: CZA or IWS?

As of June 9, 2026, CZA holds $182.74 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWS manages $15.33 B.

What sectors do the CZA and IWS ETFs invest in?

CZA leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Health Care. Meanwhile, IWS focuses on Industrials, Financials and Information Technology.

What are the top holdings of the CZA ETF and IWS ETF?

CZA top holdings include STATE STREET, AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP and PUBLIC SRVCE ENT. IWS holds in its top three: US80004C2008, WESTERN DIGITAL and CORNING.

Which ETF is more diversified: CZA or IWS?

CZA holds 101 securities with 27.14% of its assets in the top 15. IWS has 713 securities and a top 15 weight of 12.25%.

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up