Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CZAvsIVOVETF Comparison
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) is part of the US Mid Cap Value segment. CZA's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Materials. In contrast, IVOV's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. CZA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.69%, versus 0.1% for IVOV. CZA is down -0.05% year-to-date (YTD) with -$42M in YTD flows. IVOV performs worse with -0.5% YTD performance, and +$58M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CZA and IVOV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CZA vs IVOV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CZA IVOV | -4.44%-7.30% | -0.79%-2.02% | -0.05%-0.50% | +10.07%+12.39% | +36.87%+39.64% | +43.39%+38.11% |
| Flows | CZA IVOV | -+$50M | -$3M+$61M | -$42M+$58M | -$19M+$192M | -$67M+$141M | -$98M+$305M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CZA IVOV | +12.47%+15.18% | +17.67%+20.64% | +14.78%+18.21% | +16.06%+19.55% |
| Max drawdown | CZA IVOV | -6.49%-8.96% | -13.23%-15.18% | -18.73%-22.49% | -18.73%-22.49% |
| Max drawdown duration | CZA IVOV | 14d32d | 37d52d | 373d379d | 373d379d |
CZA | IVOV | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $110.44 | $100.40 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $110.66 | $100.46 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CZA | IVOV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CZA | IVOV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $110.44 | $100.40 |
| 1D performance | -0.20% | -0.06% |
| AuM | $180.40 M | $1.17 B |
| E/R | 0.69% | 0.1% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CZA and IVOV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, CZA is down -0.05% year-to-date (YTD), while IVOV has lost -0.5%. That puts CZA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CZA or IVOV?
Year-to-date, the CZA ETF saw -$42M in flows, compared to +$58M for IVOV.
Which ETF is more volatile: CZA or IVOV?
Over the past year, CZA had a volatility of 17.67%, while IVOV experienced 20.64%.
Which ETF is bigger: CZA or IVOV?
As of March 12, 2026, CZA holds $180.40 M in assets under management (AUM), while IVOV manages $1.17 B.
What sectors do the CZA and IVOV ETFs invest in?
CZA leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Materials. Meanwhile, IVOV focuses on Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the CZA ETF and IVOV ETF?
CZA top holdings include IQVIA HOLDINGS INC, NUCOR and WABTEC. IVOV holds in its top three: US FOODS HOLDING CORP, RELIANCE STEEL and JONES LANG LASALLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: CZA or IVOV?
CZA holds 101 securities with 28.8% of its assets in the top 15. IVOV has 306 securities and a top 15 weight of 13.41%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
