Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CZAvsIJJETF Comparison
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ) is part of the US Mid Cap Value segment. CZA's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Materials. In contrast, IJJ's top sector exposures are Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. CZA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.69%, versus 0.18% for IJJ. CZA is down -0.25% year-to-date (YTD) with -$42M in YTD flows. IJJ performs worse with -0.58% YTD performance, and -$42M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CZA and IJJ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CZA vs IJJ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CZA IJJ | -5.31%-8.06% | -1.36%-2.00% | -0.25%-0.58% | +10.92%+13.56% | +36.60%+39.24% | +41.56%+36.16% |
| Flows | CZA IJJ | --$34M | -$3M-$44M | -$42M-$42M | -$19M-$691M | -$67M-$1.54B | -$98M-$1.91B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CZA IJJ | +12.45%+15.28% | +17.64%+20.63% | +14.77%+18.29% | +16.06%+19.62% |
| Max drawdown | CZA IJJ | -6.67%-9.03% | -13.23%-15.19% | -18.73%-22.51% | -18.73%-22.51% |
| Max drawdown duration | CZA IJJ | 15d33d | 37d52d | 373d379d | 373d379d |
CZA | IJJ | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $110.44 | $130.77 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $110.66 | $130.90 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
CZA | IJJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
CZA | IJJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $110.44 | $130.77 |
| 1D performance | -0.20% | -0.10% |
| AuM | $180.04 M | $7.87 B |
| E/R | 0.69% | 0.18% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CZA and IJJ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, CZA is down -0.25% year-to-date (YTD), while IJJ has lost -0.58%. That puts CZA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CZA or IJJ?
Year-to-date, the CZA ETF saw -$42M in flows, compared to -$42M for IJJ.
Which ETF is more volatile: CZA or IJJ?
Over the past year, CZA had a volatility of 17.64%, while IJJ experienced 20.63%.
Which ETF is bigger: CZA or IJJ?
As of March 13, 2026, CZA holds $180.04 M in assets under management (AUM), while IJJ manages $7.87 B.
What sectors do the CZA and IJJ ETFs invest in?
CZA leans toward sectors like Financials, Industrials and Materials. Meanwhile, IJJ focuses on Financials, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the CZA ETF and IJJ ETF?
CZA top holdings include IQVIA HOLDINGS INC, NUCOR and WABTEC. IJJ holds in its top three: US FOODS HOLDING CORP, RELIANCE STEEL and JONES LANG LASALLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: CZA or IJJ?
CZA holds 101 securities with 28.8% of its assets in the top 15. IJJ has 306 securities and a top 15 weight of 13.4%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
