CZAvsFLQMETF Comparison
VS
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA) and Franklin U.S. Mid Cap Multifactor Index ETF (FLQM) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. CZA's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Healthcare. In contrast, FLQM's top sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Industrials. CZA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.69%, versus 0.3% for FLQM. CZA is up 12.38% year-to-date (YTD) with -$56M in YTD flows. FLQM performs worse with 6.23% YTD performance, and -$257M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CZA and FLQM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CZA vs FLQM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CZA FLQM | +2.96%+3.15% | +7.17%+5.12% | +12.38%+6.23% | +16.42%+9.00% | +41.17%+34.50% | +45.36%+41.20% |
| Flows | CZA FLQM | -$1M-$18M | -$9M-$103M | -$56M-$257M | -$23M-$231M | -$74M+$1.08B | -$97M+$1.27B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CZA FLQM | +10.79%+11.91% | +12.62%+12.28% | +14.60%+14.48% | +16.04%+16.39% |
| Max drawdown | CZA FLQM | -2.82%-2.85% | -9.18%-7.59% | -18.73%-19.74% | -18.73%-22.41% |
| Max drawdown duration | CZA FLQM | 28d22d | 97d137d | 373d406d | 373d714d |
Trading data
CZA | FLQM | |
Last sale 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM | $124.47 | $59.25 |
| Previous close 07/23/2026 | $123.12 | $58.50 |
| Consolidated volume 07/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CZA | FLQM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CZA | FLQM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $124.47 | $59.25 |
| 1D performance | +1.10% | +1.29% |
| AuM | $187.90 M | $1.56 B |
| E/R | 0.69% | 0.3% |
Characteristics
CZA | FLQM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | Franklin Templeton |
| Benchmark | Zacks Mid-Cap Core Index | LibertyQ US Mid Cap Equity Index |
| N° of holdings | 101 | 202 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 2, 2007 | April 26, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CZA
USA
84.13%
Other
15.87%
FLQM
USA
95.25%
Other
4.75%
Sectors
CZA
Finance
36.42%
Industrials
14.86%
Healthcare
13.46%
Utilities
10.55%
Consumer Services
8.21%
Technology
7.17%
Other
9.33%
FLQM
Finance
19.44%
Healthcare
15.08%
Industrials
15.05%
Technology
12.74%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.79%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.93%
Other
18.97%
Advertisement
Diversification
CZA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
28.47%
FLQM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
16.43%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
CZA
Flex Ltd.
2.47%
State Street Corp.
2.19%
Humana, Inc.
2.15%
Viking Holdings Ltd. (Bermuda)
2.10%
Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc.
1.98%
American International Group, Inc.
1.95%
Sysco Corp.
1.88%
PG&E Corp.
1.83%
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
1.81%
Prudential Financial, Inc.
1.77%
The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc.
1.74%
Huntington Bancshares, Inc.
1.70%
Roper Technologies, Inc.
1.69%
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
1.64%
Centene Corp.
1.59%
FLQM
United Airlines Holdings, Inc.
1.16%
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
1.15%
Cincinnati Financial Corp.
1.15%
Expedia Group, Inc.
1.14%
The Allstate Corp.
1.14%
Delta Air Lines, Inc.
1.10%
Kenvue, Inc.
1.09%
Teradyne, Inc.
1.08%
Sysco Corp.
1.07%
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
1.07%
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
1.07%
Prudential Financial, Inc.
1.06%
Fastenal Co.
1.05%
Cencora, Inc.
1.05%
Yum! Brands, Inc.
1.04%
Frequently asked questions about CZA and FLQM
How have the CZA and FLQM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 24, 2026, CZA is up 12.38% year-to-date (YTD), while FLQM has returned 6.23%. That puts CZA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CZA or FLQM?
Year-to-date, the CZA ETF saw -$56M in flows, compared to -$257M for FLQM.
Which ETF is more volatile: CZA or FLQM?
Over the past year, CZA had a volatility of 12.62%, while FLQM experienced 12.28%.
Which ETF is bigger: CZA or FLQM?
As of July 24, 2026, CZA holds $187.90 M in assets under management (AUM), while FLQM manages $1.56 B.
What sectors do the CZA and FLQM ETFs invest in?
CZA leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Healthcare. Meanwhile, FLQM focuses on Finance, Healthcare and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the CZA ETF and FLQM ETF?
CZA top holdings include Flex Ltd., State Street Corp. and Humana, Inc.. FLQM holds in its top three: United Airlines Holdings, Inc., Williams-Sonoma, Inc. and Cincinnati Financial Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: CZA or FLQM?
CZA holds 101 securities with 28.47% of its assets in the top 15. FLQM has 205 securities and a top 15 weight of 16.43%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
