CZAvsABCSETF Comparison
VS
Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF (CZA) and Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. CZA's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Healthcare. In contrast, ABCS's top sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Industrials. CZA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.69%, versus 0.42% for ABCS. CZA is up 12.38% year-to-date (YTD) with -$56M in YTD flows. ABCS performs better with 14.51% YTD performance, and +$4K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CZA and ABCS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CZA vs ABCS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CZA ABCS | +2.96%+4.73% | +7.17%+9.56% | +12.38%+14.51% | +16.42%+20.01% | +41.17%n/a | +45.36%n/a |
| Flows | CZA ABCS | -$1M-$994K | -$9M-$6K | -$56M+$4K | -$23M-$302K | -$74M- | -$97M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CZA ABCS | +10.79%+10.85% | +12.62%+13.39% | +14.60%n/a | +16.04%n/a |
| Max drawdown | CZA ABCS | -2.82%-1.97% | -9.18%-8.29% | -18.73%n/a | -18.73%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CZA ABCS | 28d15d | 97d67d | 373dn/a | 373dn/a |
Trading data
CZA | ABCS | |
Last sale 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM | $124.47 | $34.66 |
| Previous close 07/23/2026 | $123.12 | $34.15 |
| Consolidated volume 07/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
ABCS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCZA | ABCS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CZA | ABCS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $124.47 | $34.66 |
| 1D performance | +1.10% | +1.51% |
| AuM | $187.90 M | $12.13 M |
| E/R | 0.69% | 0.42% |
Characteristics
CZA | ABCS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Invesco | Alpha Blue Capital Management |
| Benchmark | Zacks Mid-Cap Core Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 101 | 1541 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 2, 2007 | December 20, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CZA
USA
84.13%
Other
15.87%
ABCS
USA
90.39%
Other
9.61%
Sectors
CZA
Finance
36.42%
Industrials
14.86%
Healthcare
13.46%
Utilities
10.55%
Consumer Services
8.21%
Technology
7.17%
Other
9.33%
ABCS
Finance
31.59%
Healthcare
15.96%
Industrials
8.91%
Technology
8.65%
Other
34.89%
Advertisement
Diversification
CZA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
28.47%
ABCS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
20.44%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
CZA
Flex Ltd.
2.47%
State Street Corp.
2.19%
Humana, Inc.
2.15%
Viking Holdings Ltd. (Bermuda)
2.10%
Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc.
1.98%
American International Group, Inc.
1.95%
Sysco Corp.
1.88%
PG&E Corp.
1.83%
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
1.81%
Prudential Financial, Inc.
1.77%
The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc.
1.74%
Huntington Bancshares, Inc.
1.70%
Roper Technologies, Inc.
1.69%
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
1.64%
Centene Corp.
1.59%
ABCS
Elevance Health, Inc.
2.22%
Global Payments, Inc.
1.69%
Ameriprise Financial, Inc.
1.60%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.
1.46%
U.S. Bancorp
1.42%
GE Healthcare Technologies, Inc.
1.39%
Delta Air Lines, Inc.
1.34%
Centene Corp.
1.27%
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
1.23%
Fiserv, Inc.
1.17%
Energy Transfer LP
1.16%
SLM Corp.
1.14%
Lithia Motors, Inc.
1.14%
Humana, Inc.
1.11%
Tenet Healthcare Corp.
1.10%
Frequently asked questions about CZA and ABCS
How have the CZA and ABCS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 24, 2026, CZA is up 12.38% year-to-date (YTD), while ABCS has returned 14.51%. That puts ABCS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CZA or ABCS?
Year-to-date, the CZA ETF saw -$56M in flows, compared to +$4K for ABCS.
Which ETF is more volatile: CZA or ABCS?
Over the past year, CZA had a volatility of 12.62%, while ABCS experienced 13.39%.
Which ETF is bigger: CZA or ABCS?
As of July 24, 2026, CZA holds $187.90 M in assets under management (AUM), while ABCS manages $12.13 M.
What sectors do the CZA and ABCS ETFs invest in?
CZA leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Healthcare. Meanwhile, ABCS focuses on Finance, Healthcare and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the CZA ETF and ABCS ETF?
CZA top holdings include Flex Ltd., State Street Corp. and Humana, Inc.. ABCS holds in its top three: Elevance Health, Inc., Global Payments, Inc. and Ameriprise Financial, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CZA or ABCS?
CZA holds 101 securities with 28.47% of its assets in the top 15. ABCS has 1567 securities and a top 15 weight of 20.44%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
