CWSvsVOETF Comparison
VS
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Vanguard Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (VO) is part of the US Mid Cap segment. CWS's top 3 sector exposures are Healthcare, Industrials and Technology. In contrast, VO's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Technology. CWS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.03% for VO. CWS is down -0.69% year-to-date (YTD) with -$65M in YTD flows. VO performs better with 13.78% YTD performance, and +$5.14B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CWS and VO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CWS vs VO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 11/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CWS VO | +1.52%+2.61% | -4.72%+0.21% | -0.69%+13.78% | +1.55%+14.28% | +35.65%+67.86% | +39.61%+38.60% |
| Flows | CWS VO | -$8M-$10M | -$12M+$11M | -$65M+$5.14B | -$68M+$7.15B | +$9M+$21.15B | +$49M+$28.81B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CWS VO | +12.52%+10.66% | +13.51%+12.50% | +13.82%+14.50% | +15.85%+17.52% |
| Max drawdown | CWS VO | -9.63%-6.83% | -11.94%-8.12% | -16.20%-18.93% | -23.63%-27.54% |
| Max drawdown duration | CWS VO | 77d78d | 196d49d | 404d211d | 532d972d |
Trading data
CWS | VO | |
Last sale 11/2/2026 at 8:23 PM | $68.10 | $81.88 |
| Previous close 11/02/2026 | $67.04 | $81.66 |
| Consolidated volume 11/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CWS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCWS | VO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/2/2026 at 8:23 PM
Live
Closed
CWS | VO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $68.10 | $81.88 |
| 1D performance | +1.58% | +0.27% |
| AuM | $112.87 M | $107.64 B |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.03% |
Characteristics
CWS | VO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | AdvisorShares | Vanguard |
| Benchmark | - | CRSP U.S. Mid Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 25 | 268 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 20, 2016 | January 26, 2004 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CWS
USA
99.88%
Other
0.12%
VO
USA
95.78%
Other
4.22%
Sectors
CWS
Healthcare
28.08%
Industrials
27.18%
Technology
13.93%
Business Services
7.53%
Other
23.28%
VO
Finance
20.35%
Industrials
16.65%
Technology
16.35%
Healthcare
9.24%
Energy
7.97%
Utilities
7.68%
Other
21.76%
Diversification
CWS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
71.21%
VO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
13.59%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
CWS
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
7.50%
IES Holdings, Inc.
6.11%
Science Applications International Corp.
5.38%
Amphenol Corp.
5.23%
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
4.71%
McKesson Corp.
4.68%
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
4.66%
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
4.50%
Henry Schein, Inc.
4.50%
Mueller Industries, Inc.
4.22%
FactSet Research Systems, Inc.
4.04%
American Water Works Co., Inc.
3.99%
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
3.92%
Cencora, Inc.
3.90%
ResMed, Inc.
3.87%
VO
Cloudflare, Inc.
1.11%
Valero Energy Corp.
1.10%
Marathon Petroleum Corp.
1.10%
Phillips 66
1.01%
Quanta Services, Inc.
0.95%
Vertiv Holdings Co.
0.92%
Datadog, Inc.
0.91%
Howmet Aerospace, Inc.
0.89%
Robinhood Markets, Inc.
0.88%
Lumentum Holdings, Inc.
0.86%
Constellation Energy Corp.
0.84%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.
0.79%
Bloom Energy Corp.
0.77%
Ross Stores, Inc.
0.74%
Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.
0.73%
Frequently asked questions about CWS and VO
How have the CWS and VO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of November 2, 2026, CWS is down -0.69% year-to-date (YTD), while VO has returned 13.78%. That puts VO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CWS or VO?
Year-to-date, the CWS ETF saw -$65M in flows, compared to +$5.14B for VO.
Which ETF is more volatile: CWS or VO?
Over the past year, CWS had a volatility of 13.51%, while VO experienced 12.5%.
Which ETF is bigger: CWS or VO?
As of November 2, 2026, CWS holds $112.87 M in assets under management (AUM), while VO manages $107.64 B.
What sectors do the CWS and VO ETFs invest in?
CWS leans toward sectors like Healthcare, Industrials and Technology. Meanwhile, VO focuses on Finance, Industrials and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the CWS ETF and VO ETF?
CWS top holdings include Comfort Systems USA, Inc., IES Holdings, Inc. and Science Applications International Corp.. VO holds in its top three: Cloudflare, Inc., Valero Energy Corp. and Marathon Petroleum Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: CWS or VO?
CWS holds 25 securities with 71.21% of its assets in the top 15. VO has 271 securities and a top 15 weight of 13.59%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
