CWSvsTMFXETF Comparison
VS
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) and Motley Fool Next Index ETF (TMFX) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. CWS's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Healthcare and Technology. In contrast, TMFX's top sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Finance. CWS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.5% for TMFX. CWS is up 3.82% year-to-date (YTD) with -$52M in YTD flows. TMFX performs better with 7.77% YTD performance, and -$3M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CWS and TMFX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CWS vs TMFX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/31/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CWS TMFX | +4.59%+1.63% | +4.75%+11.04% | +3.82%+7.77% | +3.80%+10.01% | +29.81%+40.61% | +49.90%n/a |
| Flows | CWS TMFX | -$7M-$14K | -$29M-$1M | -$52M-$3M | -$62M-$3M | +$24M-$7M | +$62M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CWS TMFX | +11.07%+16.36% | +13.44%+17.43% | +13.92%+19.43% | +15.83%n/a |
| Max drawdown | CWS TMFX | -2.43%-4.46% | -11.94%-13.97% | -16.20%-23.94% | -23.63%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CWS TMFX | 18d24d | 193d126d | 404d157d | 532dn/a |
Trading data
CWS | TMFX | |
Last sale 8/3/2026 at 1:30 PM | $71.60 | $23.40 |
| Previous close 07/31/2026 | $71.44 | $23.06 |
| Consolidated volume 07/31/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CWS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCWS | TMFX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/3/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CWS | TMFX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $71.60 | $23.40 |
| 1D performance | +0.23% | +1.50% |
| AuM | $130.83 M | $33.08 M |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.5% |
Characteristics
CWS | TMFX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | AdvisorShares | Motley Fool Asset Management |
| Benchmark | - | Motley Fool Next Index |
| N° of holdings | 25 | 189 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 20, 2016 | December 31, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CWS
USA
99.79%
Other
0.21%
TMFX
USA
99.72%
Other
0.28%
Sectors
CWS
Industrials
29.33%
Healthcare
25.25%
Technology
12.24%
Business Services
9.29%
Other
23.89%
TMFX
Technology
24.93%
Healthcare
19.01%
Finance
14.09%
Industrials
12.65%
Consumer Cyclical.
11.69%
Other
17.63%
Advertisement
Diversification
CWS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
71.71%
TMFX
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
23.65%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
CWS
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
8.45%
IES Holdings, Inc.
7.38%
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
5.65%
Amphenol Corp.
4.97%
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
4.70%
Henry Schein, Inc.
4.49%
Science Applications International Corp.
4.49%
HEICO Corp.
4.31%
Mueller Industries, Inc.
4.25%
Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
4.20%
American Water Works Co., Inc.
4.09%
Stryker Corp.
3.79%
McKesson Corp.
3.69%
Moody's Corp.
3.68%
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
3.57%
TMFX
Astera Labs, Inc.
3.34%
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
1.99%
Reddit, Inc.
1.60%
MasTec, Inc.
1.56%
Biogen, Inc.
1.54%
Twilio, Inc.
1.44%
Copart, Inc.
1.43%
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
1.42%
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
1.40%
Fair Isaac Corp.
1.37%
Veeva Systems, Inc.
1.36%
Illumina, Inc.
1.31%
Zoom Communications, Inc.
1.30%
DexCom, Inc.
1.30%
Moderna, Inc.
1.29%
Frequently asked questions about CWS and TMFX
How have the CWS and TMFX ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 31, 2026, CWS is up 3.82% year-to-date (YTD), while TMFX has returned 7.77%. That puts TMFX better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CWS or TMFX?
Year-to-date, the CWS ETF saw -$52M in flows, compared to -$3M for TMFX.
Which ETF is more volatile: CWS or TMFX?
Over the past year, CWS had a volatility of 13.44%, while TMFX experienced 17.43%.
Which ETF is bigger: CWS or TMFX?
As of July 31, 2026, CWS holds $130.83 M in assets under management (AUM), while TMFX manages $33.08 M.
What sectors do the CWS and TMFX ETFs invest in?
CWS leans toward sectors like Industrials, Healthcare and Technology. Meanwhile, TMFX focuses on Technology, Healthcare and Finance.
What are the top holdings of the CWS ETF and TMFX ETF?
CWS top holdings include Comfort Systems USA, Inc., IES Holdings, Inc. and Casey's General Stores, Inc.. TMFX holds in its top three: Astera Labs, Inc., Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. and Reddit, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CWS or TMFX?
CWS holds 25 securities with 71.71% of its assets in the top 15. TMFX has 189 securities and a top 15 weight of 23.65%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
