CWSvsTMFMETF Comparison
VS
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) and Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. CWS's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Healthcare and Technology. In contrast, TMFM's top sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Healthcare. CWS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.85% for TMFM. CWS is up 3.82% year-to-date (YTD) with -$52M in YTD flows. TMFM performs worse with -6.03% YTD performance, and -$21M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CWS and TMFM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CWS vs TMFM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/31/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CWS TMFM | +4.59%+1.82% | +4.75%+5.90% | +3.82%-6.03% | +3.80%-17.06% | +29.81%+2.80% | +49.90%n/a |
| Flows | CWS TMFM | -$7M-$2M | -$29M-$10M | -$52M-$21M | -$62M-$35M | +$24M-$70M | +$62M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CWS TMFM | +11.07%+23.19% | +13.44%+19.46% | +13.92%+17.95% | +15.83%n/a |
| Max drawdown | CWS TMFM | -2.43%-6.88% | -11.94%-25.89% | -16.20%-31.61% | -23.63%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CWS TMFM | 18d30d | 193d365d | 404d611d | 532dn/a |
Trading data
CWS | TMFM | |
Last sale 8/3/2026 at 1:30 PM | $71.60 | $22.58 |
| Previous close 07/31/2026 | $71.44 | $22.08 |
| Consolidated volume 07/31/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/3/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CWS | TMFM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $71.60 | $22.58 |
| 1D performance | +0.23% | +2.26% |
| AuM | $130.83 M | $114.33 M |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.85% |
Characteristics
CWS | TMFM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | AdvisorShares | Motley Fool Asset Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 25 | 31 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 20, 2016 | June 17, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CWS
USA
99.79%
Other
0.21%
TMFM
USA
97.14%
Other
2.86%
Sectors
CWS
Industrials
29.33%
Healthcare
25.25%
Technology
12.24%
Business Services
9.29%
Other
23.89%
TMFM
Finance
29.03%
Industrials
20.48%
Healthcare
19.11%
Technology
14.96%
Business Services
8.63%
Other
7.79%
Advertisement
Diversification
CWS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
71.71%
TMFM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
68.43%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
CWS
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
8.45%
IES Holdings, Inc.
7.38%
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
5.65%
Amphenol Corp.
4.97%
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
4.70%
Henry Schein, Inc.
4.49%
Science Applications International Corp.
4.49%
HEICO Corp.
4.31%
Mueller Industries, Inc.
4.25%
Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
4.20%
American Water Works Co., Inc.
4.09%
Stryker Corp.
3.79%
McKesson Corp.
3.69%
Moody's Corp.
3.68%
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
3.57%
TMFM
StoneX Group, Inc.
10.19%
West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc.
5.11%
HealthEquity, Inc.
4.96%
DexCom, Inc.
4.89%
QXO, Inc.
4.64%
GXO Logistics, Inc.
4.58%
SBA Communications Corp.
4.03%
Axon Enterprise, Inc.
3.95%
Toast, Inc.
3.88%
Datadog, Inc.
3.86%
Brown & Brown, Inc.
3.78%
Waters Corp.
3.74%
Guidewire Software, Inc.
3.68%
Tyler Technologies, Inc.
3.67%
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
3.47%
Frequently asked questions about CWS and TMFM
How have the CWS and TMFM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 31, 2026, CWS is up 3.82% year-to-date (YTD), while TMFM has lost -6.03%. That puts CWS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CWS or TMFM?
Year-to-date, the CWS ETF saw -$52M in flows, compared to -$21M for TMFM.
Which ETF is more volatile: CWS or TMFM?
Over the past year, CWS had a volatility of 13.44%, while TMFM experienced 19.46%.
Which ETF is bigger: CWS or TMFM?
As of July 31, 2026, CWS holds $130.83 M in assets under management (AUM), while TMFM manages $114.33 M.
What sectors do the CWS and TMFM ETFs invest in?
CWS leans toward sectors like Industrials, Healthcare and Technology. Meanwhile, TMFM focuses on Finance, Industrials and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the CWS ETF and TMFM ETF?
CWS top holdings include Comfort Systems USA, Inc., IES Holdings, Inc. and Casey's General Stores, Inc.. TMFM holds in its top three: StoneX Group, Inc., West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. and HealthEquity, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CWS or TMFM?
CWS holds 25 securities with 71.71% of its assets in the top 15. TMFM has 31 securities and a top 15 weight of 68.43%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
