CWSvsSIZEETF Comparison
VS
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. iShares MSCI USA Size Factor ETF (SIZE) is part of the US Large Cap segment. CWS's top 3 sector exposures are Healthcare, Industrials and Technology. In contrast, SIZE's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Industrials. CWS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.15% for SIZE. CWS is down -0.69% year-to-date (YTD) with -$65M in YTD flows. SIZE performs better with 13.08% YTD performance, and -$556K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CWS and SIZE below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CWS vs SIZE performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 11/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CWS SIZE | +1.52%+3.04% | -4.72%+0.46% | -0.69%+13.08% | +1.55%+14.61% | +35.65%+64.49% | +39.61%+42.84% |
| Flows | CWS SIZE | -$8M- | -$12M- | -$65M-$556K | -$68M+$16M | +$9M-$3M | +$49M-$299M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CWS SIZE | +12.52%+10.51% | +13.51%+12.13% | +13.82%+14.32% | +15.85%+17.06% |
| Max drawdown | CWS SIZE | -9.63%-6.56% | -11.94%-7.92% | -16.20%-18.57% | -23.63%-24.05% |
| Max drawdown duration | CWS SIZE | 77d81d | 196d49d | 404d219d | 532d820d |
Trading data
CWS | SIZE | |
Last sale 11/2/2026 at 8:23 PM | $68.10 | $180.99 |
| Previous close 11/02/2026 | $67.04 | $180.13 |
| Consolidated volume 11/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CWS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCWS | SIZE | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/2/2026 at 8:23 PM
Live
Closed
CWS | SIZE | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $68.10 | $180.99 |
| 1D performance | +1.58% | +0.47% |
| AuM | $112.87 M | $434.34 M |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
CWS | SIZE | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | AdvisorShares | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | MSCI USA Low Size Index |
| N° of holdings | 25 | 511 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 20, 2016 | April 16, 2013 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CWS
USA
99.88%
Other
0.12%
SIZE
USA
94.6%
Other
5.4%
Sectors
CWS
Healthcare
28.08%
Industrials
27.18%
Technology
13.93%
Business Services
7.53%
Other
23.28%
SIZE
Finance
20.9%
Technology
18.59%
Industrials
13.34%
Healthcare
12.51%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.03%
Other
27.64%
Advertisement
Diversification
CWS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
71.21%
SIZE
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
5.53%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
CWS
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
7.50%
IES Holdings, Inc.
6.11%
Science Applications International Corp.
5.38%
Amphenol Corp.
5.23%
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
4.71%
McKesson Corp.
4.68%
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
4.66%
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
4.50%
Henry Schein, Inc.
4.50%
Mueller Industries, Inc.
4.22%
FactSet Research Systems, Inc.
4.04%
American Water Works Co., Inc.
3.99%
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
3.92%
Cencora, Inc.
3.90%
ResMed, Inc.
3.87%
SIZE
Okta, Inc.
0.49%
Dell Technologies, Inc.
0.42%
Natera, Inc.
0.41%
Atlassian Corp.
0.41%
Illumina, Inc.
0.38%
Snowflake, Inc.
0.38%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.
0.38%
Equity Residential
0.36%
SharkNinja, Inc.
0.35%
NetApp, Inc.
0.34%
Veeva Systems, Inc.
0.34%
Everpure, Inc.
0.34%
Cloudflare, Inc.
0.32%
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
0.31%
Agilent Technologies, Inc.
0.30%
Frequently asked questions about CWS and SIZE
How have the CWS and SIZE ETFs performed in 2026?
As of November 2, 2026, CWS is down -0.69% year-to-date (YTD), while SIZE has returned 13.08%. That puts SIZE better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CWS or SIZE?
Year-to-date, the CWS ETF saw -$65M in flows, compared to -$556K for SIZE.
Which ETF is more volatile: CWS or SIZE?
Over the past year, CWS had a volatility of 13.51%, while SIZE experienced 12.13%.
Which ETF is bigger: CWS or SIZE?
As of November 2, 2026, CWS holds $112.87 M in assets under management (AUM), while SIZE manages $434.34 M.
What sectors do the CWS and SIZE ETFs invest in?
CWS leans toward sectors like Healthcare, Industrials and Technology. Meanwhile, SIZE focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the CWS ETF and SIZE ETF?
CWS top holdings include Comfort Systems USA, Inc., IES Holdings, Inc. and Science Applications International Corp.. SIZE holds in its top three: Okta, Inc., Dell Technologies, Inc. and Natera, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CWS or SIZE?
CWS holds 25 securities with 71.21% of its assets in the top 15. SIZE has 515 securities and a top 15 weight of 5.53%.
Advertisement
Latest news about CWS & SIZE
Advertisement
