CWSvsRUNNETF Comparison
VS
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN) is part of the Uncategorized Equities segment. CWS's top 3 sector exposures are Healthcare, Industrials and Technology. In contrast, RUNN's top sector exposures are Industrials, Technology and Healthcare. CWS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.58% for RUNN. CWS is down -0.69% year-to-date (YTD) with -$65M in YTD flows. RUNN performs better with 6.92% YTD performance, and +$20M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CWS and RUNN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CWS vs RUNN performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 11/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CWS RUNN | +1.52%+9.18% | -4.72%+3.30% | -0.69%+6.92% | +1.55%+8.97% | +35.65%+41.43% | +39.61%n/a |
| Flows | CWS RUNN | -$8M-$4M | -$12M+$1M | -$65M+$20M | -$68M+$23M | +$9M+$295M | +$49M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CWS RUNN | +12.52%+14.12% | +13.51%+14.16% | +13.82%+14.20% | +15.85%n/a |
| Max drawdown | CWS RUNN | -9.63%-8.60% | -11.94%-10.26% | -16.20%-17.02% | -23.63%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CWS RUNN | 77d78d | 196d176d | 404d630d | 532dn/a |
Trading data
CWS | RUNN | |
Last sale 11/2/2026 at 8:23 PM | $68.10 | $35.68 |
| Previous close 11/02/2026 | $67.04 | $34.96 |
| Consolidated volume 11/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/2/2026 at 8:23 PM
Live
Closed
CWS | RUNN | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $68.10 | $35.68 |
| 1D performance | +1.58% | +2.06% |
| AuM | $112.87 M | $415.74 M |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.58% |
Characteristics
CWS | RUNN | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | AdvisorShares | Running Oak Capital |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 25 | 59 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 20, 2016 | June 8, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CWS
USA
99.88%
Other
0.12%
RUNN
USA
91.14%
Other
8.86%
Sectors
CWS
Healthcare
28.08%
Industrials
27.18%
Technology
13.93%
Business Services
7.53%
Other
23.28%
RUNN
Industrials
30.58%
Technology
15.3%
Healthcare
14.61%
Finance
14.3%
Business Services
10.61%
Other
14.6%
Advertisement
Diversification
CWS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
71.21%
RUNN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
31.75%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
CWS
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
7.50%
IES Holdings, Inc.
6.11%
Science Applications International Corp.
5.38%
Amphenol Corp.
5.23%
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
4.71%
McKesson Corp.
4.68%
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
4.66%
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
4.50%
Henry Schein, Inc.
4.50%
Mueller Industries, Inc.
4.22%
FactSet Research Systems, Inc.
4.04%
American Water Works Co., Inc.
3.99%
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
3.92%
Cencora, Inc.
3.90%
ResMed, Inc.
3.87%
RUNN
Zebra Technologies Corp.
2.85%
IQVIA Holdings, Inc.
2.56%
ServiceNow, Inc.
2.52%
State Street Institutional Treasury Money Market Fund
2.28%
CACI International, Inc.
2.20%
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
2.06%
FactSet Research Systems, Inc.
2.04%
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
1.94%
Jacobs Solutions, Inc.
1.93%
Centene Corp.
1.93%
Visa, Inc.
1.93%
SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.
1.92%
Eaton Corp. Plc
1.87%
ResMed, Inc.
1.86%
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
1.86%
Frequently asked questions about CWS and RUNN
How have the CWS and RUNN ETFs performed in 2026?
As of November 2, 2026, CWS is down -0.69% year-to-date (YTD), while RUNN has returned 6.92%. That puts RUNN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CWS or RUNN?
Year-to-date, the CWS ETF saw -$65M in flows, compared to +$20M for RUNN.
Which ETF is more volatile: CWS or RUNN?
Over the past year, CWS had a volatility of 13.51%, while RUNN experienced 14.16%.
Which ETF is bigger: CWS or RUNN?
As of November 2, 2026, CWS holds $112.87 M in assets under management (AUM), while RUNN manages $415.74 M.
What sectors do the CWS and RUNN ETFs invest in?
CWS leans toward sectors like Healthcare, Industrials and Technology. Meanwhile, RUNN focuses on Industrials, Technology and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the CWS ETF and RUNN ETF?
CWS top holdings include Comfort Systems USA, Inc., IES Holdings, Inc. and Science Applications International Corp.. RUNN holds in its top three: Zebra Technologies Corp., IQVIA Holdings, Inc. and ServiceNow, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CWS or RUNN?
CWS holds 25 securities with 71.21% of its assets in the top 15. RUNN has 59 securities and a top 15 weight of 31.75%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
