CWSvsRUNNETF Comparison
VS
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF (RUNN) is part of the Uncategorized Equities segment. CWS's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Healthcare and Technology. In contrast, RUNN's top sector exposures are Industrials, Finance and Healthcare. CWS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.58% for RUNN. CWS is down -0.64% year-to-date (YTD) with -$53M in YTD flows. RUNN performs better with -0.15% YTD performance, and +$31M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CWS and RUNN below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CWS vs RUNN performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CWS RUNN | -7.15%-4.50% | -0.73%+4.30% | -0.64%-0.15% | -0.00%-2.42% | +28.21%+29.17% | +44.62%n/a |
| Flows | CWS RUNN | -$367K+$13M | -$10M+$48M | -$53M+$31M | -$64M+$34M | +$23M+$319M | +$61M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CWS RUNN | +12.55%+15.33% | +13.62%+13.93% | +13.99%+14.23% | +15.87%n/a |
| Max drawdown | CWS RUNN | -7.15%-6.49% | -11.94%-10.26% | -16.20%-17.02% | -23.63%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CWS RUNN | 30d35d | 196d176d | 404d630d | 532dn/a |
Trading data
CWS | RUNN | |
Last sale 9/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $67.98 | $33.34 |
| Previous close 09/17/2026 | $68.26 | $33.33 |
| Consolidated volume 09/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CWS | RUNN | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $67.98 | $33.34 |
| 1D performance | -0.41% | +0.01% |
| AuM | $124.52 M | $399.08 M |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.58% |
Characteristics
CWS | RUNN | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | AdvisorShares | Running Oak Capital |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 25 | 59 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 20, 2016 | June 8, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CWS
USA
99.89%
Other
0.11%
RUNN
USA
91.57%
Other
8.43%
Sectors
CWS
Industrials
27.54%
Healthcare
26.09%
Technology
12.69%
Business Services
8.67%
Other
25.01%
RUNN
Industrials
31.01%
Finance
14.64%
Healthcare
14.27%
Technology
13.84%
Business Services
10.61%
Other
15.62%
Advertisement
Diversification
CWS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
70.39%
RUNN
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
29.51%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
CWS
IES Holdings, Inc.
7.26%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
7.18%
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
6.03%
Amphenol Corp.
4.58%
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
4.46%
Science Applications International Corp.
4.45%
Mueller Industries, Inc.
4.39%
Henry Schein, Inc.
4.37%
Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
4.27%
HEICO Corp.
4.19%
McKesson Corp.
4.05%
American Water Works Co., Inc.
3.95%
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
3.87%
Moody's Corp.
3.71%
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
3.63%
RUNN
Zebra Technologies Corp.
2.16%
IQVIA Holdings, Inc.
2.15%
State Street Institutional Treasury Money Market Fund
2.07%
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
2.04%
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
2.03%
Brown & Brown, Inc.
2.02%
ServiceNow, Inc.
2.01%
Primerica, Inc.
1.92%
FactSet Research Systems, Inc.
1.91%
Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc.
1.89%
Visa, Inc.
1.88%
Stryker Corp.
1.87%
Roper Technologies, Inc.
1.86%
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
1.86%
Centene Corp.
1.85%
Frequently asked questions about CWS and RUNN
How have the CWS and RUNN ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 16, 2026, CWS is down -0.64% year-to-date (YTD), while RUNN has lost -0.15%. That puts RUNN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CWS or RUNN?
Year-to-date, the CWS ETF saw -$53M in flows, compared to +$31M for RUNN.
Which ETF is more volatile: CWS or RUNN?
Over the past year, CWS had a volatility of 13.62%, while RUNN experienced 13.93%.
Which ETF is bigger: CWS or RUNN?
As of September 16, 2026, CWS holds $124.52 M in assets under management (AUM), while RUNN manages $399.08 M.
What sectors do the CWS and RUNN ETFs invest in?
CWS leans toward sectors like Industrials, Healthcare and Technology. Meanwhile, RUNN focuses on Industrials, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the CWS ETF and RUNN ETF?
CWS top holdings include IES Holdings, Inc., Comfort Systems USA, Inc. and Casey's General Stores, Inc.. RUNN holds in its top three: Zebra Technologies Corp., IQVIA Holdings, Inc. and State Street Institutional Treasury Money Market Fund.
Which ETF is more diversified: CWS or RUNN?
CWS holds 25 securities with 70.39% of its assets in the top 15. RUNN has 59 securities and a top 15 weight of 29.51%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
