CWSvsQOWZETF Comparison
VS
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) and Invesco Nasdaq Free Cash Flow Achievers ETF (QOWZ) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. CWS's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Healthcare and Technology. In contrast, QOWZ's top sector exposures are Technology, Business Services and Healthcare. CWS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.39% for QOWZ. CWS is down -0.64% year-to-date (YTD) with -$53M in YTD flows. QOWZ performs better with 1.06% YTD performance, and -$4M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CWS and QOWZ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CWS vs QOWZ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CWS QOWZ | -7.15%-2.60% | -0.73%+9.20% | -0.64%+1.06% | -0.00%-0.49% | +28.21%n/a | +44.62%n/a |
| Flows | CWS QOWZ | -$367K- | -$10M-$4M | -$53M-$4M | -$64M-$5M | +$23M- | +$61M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CWS QOWZ | +12.55%+15.46% | +13.62%+16.28% | +13.99%n/a | +15.87%n/a |
| Max drawdown | CWS QOWZ | -7.15%-6.48% | -11.94%-17.83% | -16.20%n/a | -23.63%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CWS QOWZ | 30d21d | 196d282d | 404dn/a | 532dn/a |
Trading data
CWS | QOWZ | |
Last sale 9/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $67.98 | $36.15 |
| Previous close 09/17/2026 | $68.26 | $36.03 |
| Consolidated volume 09/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CWS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCWS | QOWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CWS | QOWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $67.98 | $36.15 |
| 1D performance | -0.41% | +0.33% |
| AuM | $124.52 M | $10.11 M |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.39% |
Characteristics
CWS | QOWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | AdvisorShares | Invesco |
| Benchmark | - | Nasdaq US Free Cash Flow Achievers Index |
| N° of holdings | 25 | 50 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 20, 2016 | December 5, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CWS
USA
99.89%
Other
0.11%
QOWZ
USA
98.32%
Other
1.68%
Sectors
CWS
Industrials
27.54%
Healthcare
26.09%
Technology
12.69%
Business Services
8.67%
Other
25.01%
QOWZ
Technology
51.99%
Business Services
12.88%
Healthcare
10.87%
Industrials
9.55%
Other
14.71%
Advertisement
Diversification
CWS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
70.39%
QOWZ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
50.71%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
CWS
IES Holdings, Inc.
7.26%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
7.18%
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
6.03%
Amphenol Corp.
4.58%
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
4.46%
Science Applications International Corp.
4.45%
Mueller Industries, Inc.
4.39%
Henry Schein, Inc.
4.37%
Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
4.27%
HEICO Corp.
4.19%
McKesson Corp.
4.05%
American Water Works Co., Inc.
3.95%
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
3.87%
Moody's Corp.
3.71%
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
3.63%
QOWZ
NVIDIA Corp.
8.87%
Broadcom Inc.
6.06%
Mastercard, Inc.
4.87%
KLA Corp.
3.14%
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
3.07%
Salesforce, Inc.
2.98%
Fortinet, Inc.
2.90%
Adobe, Inc.
2.68%
ServiceNow, Inc.
2.63%
Intuit, Inc.
2.52%
Republic Services, Inc.
2.41%
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
2.33%
Roper Technologies, Inc.
2.23%
Veeva Systems, Inc.
2.02%
IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.
1.99%
Frequently asked questions about CWS and QOWZ
How have the CWS and QOWZ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 16, 2026, CWS is down -0.64% year-to-date (YTD), while QOWZ has returned 1.06%. That puts QOWZ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CWS or QOWZ?
Year-to-date, the CWS ETF saw -$53M in flows, compared to -$4M for QOWZ.
Which ETF is more volatile: CWS or QOWZ?
Over the past year, CWS had a volatility of 13.62%, while QOWZ experienced 16.28%.
Which ETF is bigger: CWS or QOWZ?
As of September 16, 2026, CWS holds $124.52 M in assets under management (AUM), while QOWZ manages $10.11 M.
What sectors do the CWS and QOWZ ETFs invest in?
CWS leans toward sectors like Industrials, Healthcare and Technology. Meanwhile, QOWZ focuses on Technology, Business Services and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the CWS ETF and QOWZ ETF?
CWS top holdings include IES Holdings, Inc., Comfort Systems USA, Inc. and Casey's General Stores, Inc.. QOWZ holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Broadcom Inc. and Mastercard, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CWS or QOWZ?
CWS holds 25 securities with 70.39% of its assets in the top 15. QOWZ has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 50.71%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
