CWSvsQMOMETF Comparison
VS
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. CWS's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Healthcare and Technology. In contrast, QMOM's top sector exposures are Industrials, Technology and Healthcare. CWS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.28% for QMOM. CWS is up 3.82% year-to-date (YTD) with -$52M in YTD flows. QMOM performs better with 13.41% YTD performance, and +$33M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CWS and QMOM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CWS vs QMOM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/31/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CWS QMOM | +4.59%-6.20% | +4.75%-3.51% | +3.82%+13.41% | +3.80%+16.06% | +29.81%+61.35% | +49.90%+61.85% |
| Flows | CWS QMOM | -$7M+$8M | -$29M+$3M | -$52M+$33M | -$62M+$24M | +$24M+$158M | +$62M+$228M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CWS QMOM | +11.07%+28.88% | +13.44%+25.47% | +13.92%+23.52% | +15.83%+24.13% |
| Max drawdown | CWS QMOM | -2.43%-12.51% | -11.94%-12.61% | -16.20%-26.41% | -23.63%-26.41% |
| Max drawdown duration | CWS QMOM | 18d58d | 193d38d | 404d414d | 532d414d |
Trading data
CWS | QMOM | |
Last sale 8/3/2026 at 1:30 PM | $71.60 | $74.27 |
| Previous close 07/31/2026 | $71.44 | $73.74 |
| Consolidated volume 07/31/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/3/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CWS | QMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $71.60 | $74.27 |
| 1D performance | +0.23% | +0.72% |
| AuM | $130.83 M | $424.10 M |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.28% |
Characteristics
CWS | QMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | AdvisorShares | Alpha Architect |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 25 | 50 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 20, 2016 | December 2, 2015 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CWS
USA
99.79%
Other
0.21%
QMOM
USA
93.82%
Other
6.18%
Sectors
CWS
Industrials
29.33%
Healthcare
25.25%
Technology
12.24%
Business Services
9.29%
Other
23.89%
QMOM
Industrials
21.89%
Technology
21.86%
Healthcare
17.95%
Energy
16.1%
Non-Energy Materi.
16.01%
Other
6.19%
Advertisement
Diversification
CWS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
71.71%
QMOM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
30.3%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
CWS
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
8.45%
IES Holdings, Inc.
7.38%
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
5.65%
Amphenol Corp.
4.97%
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
4.70%
Henry Schein, Inc.
4.49%
Science Applications International Corp.
4.49%
HEICO Corp.
4.31%
Mueller Industries, Inc.
4.25%
Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
4.20%
American Water Works Co., Inc.
4.09%
Stryker Corp.
3.79%
McKesson Corp.
3.69%
Moody's Corp.
3.68%
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
3.57%
QMOM
Kodiak Gas Services, Inc.
2.06%
Dell Technologies, Inc.
2.05%
SLB Ltd.
2.02%
Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
2.02%
J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc.
2.02%
ATI, Inc.
2.02%
Halliburton Co.
2.02%
BorgWarner, Inc.
2.02%
Nucor Corp.
2.01%
Five Below, Inc.
2.01%
Baker Hughes Co.
2.01%
Alcoa Corp.
2.01%
Albemarle Corp.
2.01%
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
2.01%
PBF Energy, Inc.
2.01%
Frequently asked questions about CWS and QMOM
How have the CWS and QMOM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 31, 2026, CWS is up 3.82% year-to-date (YTD), while QMOM has returned 13.41%. That puts QMOM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CWS or QMOM?
Year-to-date, the CWS ETF saw -$52M in flows, compared to +$33M for QMOM.
Which ETF is more volatile: CWS or QMOM?
Over the past year, CWS had a volatility of 13.44%, while QMOM experienced 25.47%.
Which ETF is bigger: CWS or QMOM?
As of July 31, 2026, CWS holds $130.83 M in assets under management (AUM), while QMOM manages $424.10 M.
What sectors do the CWS and QMOM ETFs invest in?
CWS leans toward sectors like Industrials, Healthcare and Technology. Meanwhile, QMOM focuses on Industrials, Technology and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the CWS ETF and QMOM ETF?
CWS top holdings include Comfort Systems USA, Inc., IES Holdings, Inc. and Casey's General Stores, Inc.. QMOM holds in its top three: Kodiak Gas Services, Inc., Dell Technologies, Inc. and SLB Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: CWS or QMOM?
CWS holds 25 securities with 71.71% of its assets in the top 15. QMOM has 50 securities and a top 15 weight of 30.3%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
