CWSvsQMIDETF Comparison
VS
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) and WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Healthcare and Technology. CWS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.38% for QMID. CWS is up 3.82% year-to-date (YTD) with -$52M in YTD flows. QMID performs better with 5.34% YTD performance, and +$700K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CWS and QMID below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CWS vs QMID performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/31/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CWS QMID | +4.59%+1.31% | +4.75%+4.24% | +3.82%+5.34% | +3.80%+8.57% | +29.81%n/a | +49.90%n/a |
| Flows | CWS QMID | -$7M- | -$29M-$6K | -$52M+$700K | -$62M+$704K | +$24M- | +$62M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CWS QMID | +11.07%+13.49% | +13.44%+15.07% | +13.92%n/a | +15.83%n/a |
| Max drawdown | CWS QMID | -2.43%-4.15% | -11.94%-10.70% | -16.20%n/a | -23.63%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CWS QMID | 18d22d | 193d160d | 404dn/a | 532dn/a |
Trading data
CWS | QMID | |
Last sale 8/3/2026 at 1:30 PM | $71.60 | $30.15 |
| Previous close 07/31/2026 | $71.44 | $29.78 |
| Consolidated volume 07/31/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CWS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCWS | QMID | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/3/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CWS | QMID | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $71.60 | $30.15 |
| 1D performance | +0.23% | +1.23% |
| AuM | $130.83 M | $2.23 M |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.38% |
Characteristics
CWS | QMID | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | AdvisorShares | WisdomTree |
| Benchmark | - | WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth MidCap Index |
| N° of holdings | 25 | 124 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 20, 2016 | January 25, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CWS
USA
99.79%
Other
0.21%
QMID
USA
94.4%
Other
5.6%
Sectors
CWS
Industrials
29.33%
Healthcare
25.25%
Technology
12.24%
Business Services
9.29%
Other
23.89%
QMID
Industrials
17.76%
Healthcare
16.64%
Technology
16.63%
Finance
13.53%
Consumer Services
11.7%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.19%
Other
16.56%
Diversification
CWS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
71.71%
QMID
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
18.85%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
CWS
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
8.45%
IES Holdings, Inc.
7.38%
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
5.65%
Amphenol Corp.
4.97%
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
4.70%
Henry Schein, Inc.
4.49%
Science Applications International Corp.
4.49%
HEICO Corp.
4.31%
Mueller Industries, Inc.
4.25%
Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
4.20%
American Water Works Co., Inc.
4.09%
Stryker Corp.
3.79%
McKesson Corp.
3.69%
Moody's Corp.
3.68%
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
3.57%
QMID
Somnigroup International, Inc.
1.43%
Tenet Healthcare Corp.
1.39%
TKO Group Holdings, Inc.
1.33%
Ralph Lauren Corp.
1.32%
Dycom Industries, Inc.
1.32%
Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.
1.28%
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
1.26%
Deckers Outdoor Corp.
1.26%
Everest Group Ltd.
1.22%
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.
1.21%
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
1.20%
Mueller Industries, Inc.
1.17%
DaVita, Inc.
1.17%
Permian Resources Corp.
1.16%
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
1.13%
Frequently asked questions about CWS and QMID
How have the CWS and QMID ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 31, 2026, CWS is up 3.82% year-to-date (YTD), while QMID has returned 5.34%. That puts QMID better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CWS or QMID?
Year-to-date, the CWS ETF saw -$52M in flows, compared to +$700K for QMID.
Which ETF is more volatile: CWS or QMID?
Over the past year, CWS had a volatility of 13.44%, while QMID experienced 15.07%.
Which ETF is bigger: CWS or QMID?
As of July 31, 2026, CWS holds $130.83 M in assets under management (AUM), while QMID manages $2.23 M.
What sectors do the CWS and QMID ETFs invest in?
CWS leans toward sectors like Industrials, Healthcare and Technology. Meanwhile, QMID focuses on Industrials, Healthcare and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the CWS ETF and QMID ETF?
CWS top holdings include Comfort Systems USA, Inc., IES Holdings, Inc. and Casey's General Stores, Inc.. QMID holds in its top three: Somnigroup International, Inc., Tenet Healthcare Corp. and TKO Group Holdings, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CWS or QMID?
CWS holds 25 securities with 71.71% of its assets in the top 15. QMID has 124 securities and a top 15 weight of 18.85%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
