CWSvsQMIDETF Comparison
VS
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) and WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. CWS's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Healthcare and Technology. In contrast, QMID's top sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Industrials. CWS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.38% for QMID. CWS is down -0.64% year-to-date (YTD) with -$53M in YTD flows. QMID performs better with 3.99% YTD performance, and +$700K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CWS and QMID below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CWS vs QMID performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CWS QMID | -7.15%-4.27% | -0.73%+2.71% | -0.64%+3.99% | -0.00%+3.77% | +28.21%n/a | +44.62%n/a |
| Flows | CWS QMID | -$367K- | -$10M- | -$53M+$700K | -$64M+$704K | +$23M- | +$61M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CWS QMID | +12.55%+13.56% | +13.62%+14.96% | +13.99%n/a | +15.87%n/a |
| Max drawdown | CWS QMID | -7.15%-5.71% | -11.94%-10.70% | -16.20%n/a | -23.63%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CWS QMID | 30d24d | 196d160d | 404dn/a | 532dn/a |
Trading data
CWS | QMID | |
Last sale 9/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $67.98 | $29.38 |
| Previous close 09/17/2026 | $68.26 | $29.40 |
| Consolidated volume 09/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CWS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCWS | QMID | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CWS | QMID | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $67.98 | $29.38 |
| 1D performance | -0.41% | -0.05% |
| AuM | $124.52 M | $2.20 M |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.38% |
Characteristics
CWS | QMID | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | AdvisorShares | WisdomTree |
| Benchmark | - | WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth MidCap Index |
| N° of holdings | 25 | 124 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 20, 2016 | January 25, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CWS
USA
99.89%
Other
0.11%
QMID
USA
94.26%
Other
5.74%
Sectors
CWS
Industrials
27.54%
Healthcare
26.09%
Technology
12.69%
Business Services
8.67%
Other
25.01%
QMID
Technology
18.26%
Healthcare
17.86%
Industrials
15.12%
Finance
13.85%
Consumer Services
11.51%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.24%
Other
16.15%
Advertisement
Diversification
CWS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
70.39%
QMID
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
19.13%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
CWS
IES Holdings, Inc.
7.26%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
7.18%
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
6.03%
Amphenol Corp.
4.58%
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
4.46%
Science Applications International Corp.
4.45%
Mueller Industries, Inc.
4.39%
Henry Schein, Inc.
4.37%
Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
4.27%
HEICO Corp.
4.19%
McKesson Corp.
4.05%
American Water Works Co., Inc.
3.95%
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
3.87%
Moody's Corp.
3.71%
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
3.63%
QMID
Tenet Healthcare Corp.
1.85%
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
1.38%
Toast, Inc.
1.36%
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
1.29%
Everest Group Ltd.
1.29%
DaVita, Inc.
1.27%
Permian Resources Corp.
1.25%
Atlassian Corp.
1.21%
Ralph Lauren Corp.
1.21%
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
1.19%
Deckers Outdoor Corp.
1.19%
Somnigroup International, Inc.
1.18%
Nutanix, Inc.
1.16%
lululemon athletica, Inc.
1.16%
TKO Group Holdings, Inc.
1.16%
Frequently asked questions about CWS and QMID
How have the CWS and QMID ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 16, 2026, CWS is down -0.64% year-to-date (YTD), while QMID has returned 3.99%. That puts QMID better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CWS or QMID?
Year-to-date, the CWS ETF saw -$53M in flows, compared to +$700K for QMID.
Which ETF is more volatile: CWS or QMID?
Over the past year, CWS had a volatility of 13.62%, while QMID experienced 14.96%.
Which ETF is bigger: CWS or QMID?
As of September 16, 2026, CWS holds $124.52 M in assets under management (AUM), while QMID manages $2.20 M.
What sectors do the CWS and QMID ETFs invest in?
CWS leans toward sectors like Industrials, Healthcare and Technology. Meanwhile, QMID focuses on Technology, Healthcare and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the CWS ETF and QMID ETF?
CWS top holdings include IES Holdings, Inc., Comfort Systems USA, Inc. and Casey's General Stores, Inc.. QMID holds in its top three: Tenet Healthcare Corp., Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. and Toast, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CWS or QMID?
CWS holds 25 securities with 70.39% of its assets in the top 15. QMID has 124 securities and a top 15 weight of 19.13%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
