Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CWSvsMIDETF Comparison
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF (MID) is part of the US Mid Cap Growth segment. CWS's top 3 sector exposures are Health Care, Industrials and Information Technology. In contrast, MID's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary. CWS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.45% for MID. CWS is down -3.15% year-to-date (YTD) with -$10M in YTD flows. MID performs better with -2.94% YTD performance, and -$5M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CWS and MID below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CWS vs MID performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CWS MID | -1.04%-4.84% | -5.59%-6.93% | -3.15%-2.94% | +3.33%+12.45% | +39.86%+45.12% | +53.01%+22.48% |
| Flows | CWS MID | -$6M-$57K | -$14M+$3M | -$10M-$5M | -$17M+$7M | +$93M+$34M | +$106M+$62M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CWS MID | +14.57%+18.62% | +16.27%+23.47% | +14.04%+19.94% | +15.72%+23.98% |
| Max drawdown | CWS MID | -7.73%-7.41% | -10.33%-16.53% | -16.20%-23.84% | -23.63%-40.04% |
| Max drawdown duration | CWS MID | 51d43d | 29d38d | 404d154d | 532d1060d |
CWS | MID | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $65.54 | $61.74 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $65.56 | $61.97 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
CWS | MID | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $65.54 | $61.74 |
| 1D performance | -0.03% | -0.38% |
| AuM | $163.61 M | $88.77 M |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.45% |
CWS | MID | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | AdvisorShares | American Century Investments |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 24 | 35 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 20, 2016 | July 15, 2020 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CWS and MID ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, CWS is down -3.15% year-to-date (YTD), while MID has lost -2.94%. That puts MID better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CWS or MID?
Year-to-date, the CWS ETF saw -$10M in flows, compared to -$5M for MID.
Which ETF is more volatile: CWS or MID?
Over the past year, CWS had a volatility of 16.27%, while MID experienced 23.47%.
Which ETF is bigger: CWS or MID?
As of March 11, 2026, CWS holds $163.61 M in assets under management (AUM), while MID manages $88.77 M.
What sectors do the CWS and MID ETFs invest in?
CWS leans toward sectors like Health Care, Industrials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, MID focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the CWS ETF and MID ETF?
CWS top holdings include COMFORT SYSTEMS USA, MUELLER INDUSTRIES and ALLISON TRANSMISSION HOLDINGS. MID holds in its top three: CLOUDFLARE INC, JOHNSON CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL and MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS.
Which ETF is more diversified: CWS or MID?
CWS holds 24 securities with 63.99% of its assets in the top 15. MID has 36 securities and a top 15 weight of 56.76%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
