CWSvsKONGETF Comparison
VS
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Formidable Fortress ETF (KONG) is part of the Global Blended Cap segment. CWS's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Healthcare and Technology. In contrast, KONG's top sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. CWS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.89% for KONG. CWS is down -1.11% year-to-date (YTD) with -$57M in YTD flows. KONG performs better with 6.25% YTD performance, and -$737K in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CWS and KONG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CWS vs KONG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/18/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CWS KONG | -6.57%-1.01% | +0.86%+6.23% | -1.11%+6.25% | -0.72%+6.40% | +27.60%+29.11% | +46.16%+33.48% |
| Flows | CWS KONG | -$4M- | -$11M- | -$57M-$737K | -$67M+$25K | +$20M-$10M | +$57M-$948K |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CWS KONG | +12.07%+11.08% | +13.65%+11.42% | +13.98%+11.76% | +15.87%+13.19% |
| Max drawdown | CWS KONG | -7.58%-4.51% | -11.94%-8.51% | -16.20%-15.24% | -23.63%-17.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | CWS KONG | 32d22d | 196d123d | 404d315d | 532d713d |
Trading data
CWS | KONG | |
Last sale 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $67.94 | |
| Previous close 09/17/2026 | $67.98 | |
| Consolidated volume 09/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CWS | KONG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $67.94 | – |
| 1D performance | -0.06% | – |
| AuM | $120.54 M | $22.67 M |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.89% |
Characteristics
CWS | KONG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | AdvisorShares | Formidable |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 25 | 36 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 20, 2016 | July 21, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Exposure
Countries
CWS
USA
99.89%
Other
0.11%
KONG
USA
99.58%
Other
0.42%
Sectors
CWS
Industrials
27.54%
Healthcare
26.09%
Technology
12.69%
Business Services
8.67%
Other
25.01%
KONG
Technology
39.08%
Industrials
18.09%
Healthcare
15.49%
Finance
13.31%
Other
14.03%
Advertisement
Diversification
CWS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
70.39%
KONG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
53.89%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
CWS
IES Holdings, Inc.
7.26%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
7.18%
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
6.03%
Amphenol Corp.
4.58%
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
4.46%
Science Applications International Corp.
4.45%
Mueller Industries, Inc.
4.39%
Henry Schein, Inc.
4.37%
Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
4.27%
HEICO Corp.
4.19%
McKesson Corp.
4.05%
American Water Works Co., Inc.
3.95%
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
3.87%
Moody's Corp.
3.71%
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
3.63%
KONG
Microsoft Corp.
5.77%
ServiceNow, Inc.
5.48%
Fastenal Co.
4.03%
F5, Inc.
3.95%
Snap-On, Inc.
3.49%
NVIDIA Corp.
3.47%
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
3.47%
Texas Pacific Land Corp.
3.38%
EMCOR Group, Inc.
3.33%
Synopsys, Inc.
3.09%
Chemed Corp.
3.05%
Arista Networks, Inc.
2.94%
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
2.89%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.86%
PulteGroup, Inc.
2.70%
Frequently asked questions about CWS and KONG
How have the CWS and KONG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 18, 2026, CWS is down -1.11% year-to-date (YTD), while KONG has returned 6.25%. That puts KONG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CWS or KONG?
Year-to-date, the CWS ETF saw -$57M in flows, compared to -$737K for KONG.
Which ETF is more volatile: CWS or KONG?
Over the past year, CWS had a volatility of 13.65%, while KONG experienced 11.42%.
Which ETF is bigger: CWS or KONG?
As of September 18, 2026, CWS holds $120.54 M in assets under management (AUM), while KONG manages $22.67 M.
What sectors do the CWS and KONG ETFs invest in?
CWS leans toward sectors like Industrials, Healthcare and Technology. Meanwhile, KONG focuses on Technology, Industrials and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the CWS ETF and KONG ETF?
CWS top holdings include IES Holdings, Inc., Comfort Systems USA, Inc. and Casey's General Stores, Inc.. KONG holds in its top three: Microsoft Corp., ServiceNow, Inc. and Fastenal Co..
Which ETF is more diversified: CWS or KONG?
CWS holds 25 securities with 70.39% of its assets in the top 15. KONG has 36 securities and a top 15 weight of 53.89%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
