Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
CWSvsKONGETF Comparison
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Formidable Fortress ETF (KONG) is part of the Global Blended Cap segment. CWS's top 3 sector exposures are Health Care, Industrials and Information Technology. In contrast, KONG's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care. CWS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.89% for KONG. CWS is down -3.15% year-to-date (YTD) with -$10M in YTD flows. KONG performs better with 0.84% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CWS and KONG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
CWS vs KONG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CWS KONG | -1.04%-0.18% | -5.59%-0.00% | -3.15%+0.84% | +3.33%+7.95% | +39.86%+30.48% | +53.01%n/a |
| Flows | CWS KONG | -$6M- | -$14M- | -$10M- | -$17M-$1M | +$93M-$7M | +$106M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CWS KONG | +14.57%+11.04% | +16.27%+14.01% | +14.04%+11.44% | +15.72%n/a |
| Max drawdown | CWS KONG | -7.73%-3.42% | -10.33%-10.00% | -16.20%-15.24% | -23.63%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | CWS KONG | 51d44d | 29d45d | 404d315d | 532dn/a |
CWS | KONG | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $65.54 | |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $65.56 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
CWS | KONG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $65.54 | – |
| 1D performance | -0.03% | – |
| AuM | $163.61 M | $22.29 M |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.89% |
CWS | KONG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | AdvisorShares | Formidable |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 24 | 34 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 20, 2016 | July 21, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the CWS and KONG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, CWS is down -3.15% year-to-date (YTD), while KONG has returned 0.84%. That puts KONG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CWS or KONG?
Year-to-date, the CWS ETF saw -$10M in flows, compared to - for KONG.
Which ETF is more volatile: CWS or KONG?
Over the past year, CWS had a volatility of 16.27%, while KONG experienced 14.01%.
Which ETF is bigger: CWS or KONG?
As of March 11, 2026, CWS holds $163.61 M in assets under management (AUM), while KONG manages $22.29 M.
What sectors do the CWS and KONG ETFs invest in?
CWS leans toward sectors like Health Care, Industrials and Information Technology. Meanwhile, KONG focuses on Information Technology, Industrials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the CWS ETF and KONG ETF?
CWS top holdings include COMFORT SYSTEMS USA, MUELLER INDUSTRIES and ALLISON TRANSMISSION HOLDINGS. KONG holds in its top three: META PLATFORMS, INTERACTIVE BROKERS GROUP and NVIDIA.
Which ETF is more diversified: CWS or KONG?
CWS holds 24 securities with 63.99% of its assets in the top 15. KONG has 34 securities and a top 15 weight of 51.8%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
