CWSvsKONGETF Comparison
VS
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Formidable Fortress ETF (KONG) is part of the Global Blended Cap segment. CWS's top 3 sector exposures are Healthcare, Industrials and Technology. In contrast, KONG's top sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Healthcare. CWS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.89% for KONG. CWS is down -0.69% year-to-date (YTD) with -$65M in YTD flows. KONG performs better with 4.58% YTD performance, and -$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CWS and KONG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CWS vs KONG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 11/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CWS KONG | +1.52%-2.06% | -4.72%+0.92% | -0.69%+4.58% | +1.55%+6.55% | +35.65%+32.18% | +39.61%+27.61% |
| Flows | CWS KONG | -$8M-$807K | -$12M-$807K | -$65M-$2M | -$68M-$2M | +$9M-$10M | +$49M-$2M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CWS KONG | +12.52%+12.63% | +13.51%+11.94% | +13.82%+11.89% | +15.85%+13.23% |
| Max drawdown | CWS KONG | -9.63%-5.48% | -11.94%-8.51% | -16.20%-15.24% | -23.63%-17.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | CWS KONG | 77d64d | 196d123d | 404d315d | 532d713d |
Trading data
CWS | KONG | |
Last sale 11/2/2026 at 8:23 PM | $68.10 | |
| Previous close 11/02/2026 | $67.04 | |
| Consolidated volume 11/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/2/2026 at 8:23 PM
Live
Closed
CWS | KONG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $68.10 | – |
| 1D performance | +1.58% | – |
| AuM | $112.87 M | $21.52 M |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.89% |
Characteristics
CWS | KONG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | AdvisorShares | Formidable |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 25 | 34 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 20, 2016 | July 21, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CWS
USA
99.88%
Other
0.12%
KONG
USA
97.18%
Other
2.82%
Sectors
CWS
Healthcare
28.08%
Industrials
27.18%
Technology
13.93%
Business Services
7.53%
Other
23.28%
KONG
Technology
39.9%
Industrials
18.94%
Healthcare
13.89%
Finance
13.53%
Other
13.74%
Advertisement
Diversification
CWS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
71.21%
KONG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
57.09%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
CWS
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
7.50%
IES Holdings, Inc.
6.11%
Science Applications International Corp.
5.38%
Amphenol Corp.
5.23%
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
4.71%
McKesson Corp.
4.68%
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
4.66%
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
4.50%
Henry Schein, Inc.
4.50%
Mueller Industries, Inc.
4.22%
FactSet Research Systems, Inc.
4.04%
American Water Works Co., Inc.
3.99%
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
3.92%
Cencora, Inc.
3.90%
ResMed, Inc.
3.87%
KONG
ServiceNow, Inc.
6.47%
Microsoft Corp.
6.24%
F5, Inc.
4.29%
Fastenal Co.
4.10%
EMCOR Group, Inc.
4.02%
NVIDIA Corp.
3.87%
Synopsys, Inc.
3.39%
Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.
3.30%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
3.29%
Arista Networks, Inc.
3.25%
Texas Pacific Land Corp.
3.18%
GE Vernova, Inc.
3.10%
Snap-On, Inc.
3.03%
Chemed Corp.
2.84%
Cboe Global Markets, Inc.
2.73%
Frequently asked questions about CWS and KONG
How have the CWS and KONG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of November 2, 2026, CWS is down -0.69% year-to-date (YTD), while KONG has returned 4.58%. That puts KONG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CWS or KONG?
Year-to-date, the CWS ETF saw -$65M in flows, compared to -$2M for KONG.
Which ETF is more volatile: CWS or KONG?
Over the past year, CWS had a volatility of 13.51%, while KONG experienced 11.94%.
Which ETF is bigger: CWS or KONG?
As of November 2, 2026, CWS holds $112.87 M in assets under management (AUM), while KONG manages $21.52 M.
What sectors do the CWS and KONG ETFs invest in?
CWS leans toward sectors like Healthcare, Industrials and Technology. Meanwhile, KONG focuses on Technology, Industrials and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the CWS ETF and KONG ETF?
CWS top holdings include Comfort Systems USA, Inc., IES Holdings, Inc. and Science Applications International Corp.. KONG holds in its top three: ServiceNow, Inc., Microsoft Corp. and F5, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CWS or KONG?
CWS holds 25 securities with 71.21% of its assets in the top 15. KONG has 34 securities and a top 15 weight of 57.09%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
