CWSvsJOETETF Comparison
VS
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) and Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (JOET) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. CWS's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Healthcare and Technology. In contrast, JOET's top sector exposures are Industrials, Technology and Finance. CWS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.29% for JOET. CWS is down -0.64% year-to-date (YTD) with -$53M in YTD flows. JOET performs better with 6.83% YTD performance, and -$13M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CWS and JOET below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CWS vs JOET performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CWS JOET | -7.15%-5.06% | -0.73%-0.28% | -0.64%+6.83% | -0.00%+6.68% | +28.21%+60.57% | +44.62%+52.22% |
| Flows | CWS JOET | -$367K-$2M | -$10M+$14K | -$53M-$13M | -$64M-$2M | +$23M+$84M | +$61M+$93M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CWS JOET | +12.55%+11.21% | +13.62%+13.93% | +13.99%+16.25% | +15.87%+17.93% |
| Max drawdown | CWS JOET | -7.15%-5.93% | -11.94%-10.32% | -16.20%-19.60% | -23.63%-26.53% |
| Max drawdown duration | CWS JOET | 30d32d | 196d115d | 404d201d | 532d773d |
Trading data
CWS | JOET | |
Last sale 9/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $67.98 | $44.91 |
| Previous close 09/17/2026 | $68.26 | $44.48 |
| Consolidated volume 09/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CWS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCWS | JOET | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CWS | JOET | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $67.98 | $44.91 |
| 1D performance | -0.41% | +0.95% |
| AuM | $124.52 M | $238.03 M |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.29% |
Characteristics
CWS | JOET | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | AdvisorShares | VIRTUS Investment Partners |
| Benchmark | - | Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum Index |
| N° of holdings | 25 | 124 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 20, 2016 | November 18, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CWS
USA
99.89%
Other
0.11%
JOET
USA
94.72%
Other
5.28%
Sectors
CWS
Industrials
27.54%
Healthcare
26.09%
Technology
12.69%
Business Services
8.67%
Other
25.01%
JOET
Industrials
24.58%
Technology
22.26%
Finance
18.13%
Healthcare
11.47%
Other
23.56%
Advertisement
Diversification
CWS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
70.39%
JOET
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
16.17%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
CWS
IES Holdings, Inc.
7.26%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
7.18%
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
6.03%
Amphenol Corp.
4.58%
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
4.46%
Science Applications International Corp.
4.45%
Mueller Industries, Inc.
4.39%
Henry Schein, Inc.
4.37%
Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
4.27%
HEICO Corp.
4.19%
McKesson Corp.
4.05%
American Water Works Co., Inc.
3.95%
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
3.87%
Moody's Corp.
3.71%
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
3.63%
JOET
Datadog, Inc.
1.42%
Devon Energy Corp.
1.34%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.28%
NetApp, Inc.
1.17%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
1.11%
Illumina, Inc.
1.10%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.03%
HEICO Corp.
1.00%
United Airlines Holdings, Inc.
0.98%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
0.97%
The Travelers Cos., Inc.
0.96%
Applied Materials, Inc.
0.96%
Delta Air Lines, Inc.
0.95%
RTX Corp.
0.94%
Apple, Inc.
0.94%
Frequently asked questions about CWS and JOET
How have the CWS and JOET ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 16, 2026, CWS is down -0.64% year-to-date (YTD), while JOET has returned 6.83%. That puts JOET better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CWS or JOET?
Year-to-date, the CWS ETF saw -$53M in flows, compared to -$13M for JOET.
Which ETF is more volatile: CWS or JOET?
Over the past year, CWS had a volatility of 13.62%, while JOET experienced 13.93%.
Which ETF is bigger: CWS or JOET?
As of September 16, 2026, CWS holds $124.52 M in assets under management (AUM), while JOET manages $238.03 M.
What sectors do the CWS and JOET ETFs invest in?
CWS leans toward sectors like Industrials, Healthcare and Technology. Meanwhile, JOET focuses on Industrials, Technology and Finance.
What are the top holdings of the CWS ETF and JOET ETF?
CWS top holdings include IES Holdings, Inc., Comfort Systems USA, Inc. and Casey's General Stores, Inc.. JOET holds in its top three: Datadog, Inc., Devon Energy Corp. and Micron Technology, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CWS or JOET?
CWS holds 25 securities with 70.39% of its assets in the top 15. JOET has 124 securities and a top 15 weight of 16.17%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
