CWSvsIMCGETF Comparison
VS
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) is part of the US Mid Cap Growth segment. CWS's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Healthcare and Technology. In contrast, IMCG's top sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Finance. CWS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.06% for IMCG. CWS is up 3.82% year-to-date (YTD) with -$52M in YTD flows. IMCG performs better with 19.38% YTD performance, and +$213M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CWS and IMCG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CWS vs IMCG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/31/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CWS IMCG | +4.59%-2.76% | +4.75%+7.82% | +3.82%+19.38% | +3.80%+17.28% | +29.81%+54.86% | +49.90%+40.79% |
| Flows | CWS IMCG | -$7M+$43M | -$29M+$138M | -$52M+$213M | -$62M+$503M | +$24M+$1.13B | +$62M+$1.63B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CWS IMCG | +11.07%+18.68% | +13.44%+17.04% | +13.92%+17.67% | +15.83%+20.46% |
| Max drawdown | CWS IMCG | -2.43%-5.59% | -11.94%-10.11% | -16.20%-21.86% | -23.63%-35.09% |
| Max drawdown duration | CWS IMCG | 18d8d | 193d43d | 404d206d | 532d1060d |
Trading data
CWS | IMCG | |
Last sale 8/3/2026 at 1:30 PM | $71.60 | $96.58 |
| Previous close 07/31/2026 | $71.44 | $95.11 |
| Consolidated volume 07/31/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CWS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCWS | IMCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/3/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CWS | IMCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $71.60 | $96.58 |
| 1D performance | +0.23% | +1.55% |
| AuM | $130.83 M | $3.92 B |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.06% |
Characteristics
CWS | IMCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | AdvisorShares | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Growth Index |
| N° of holdings | 25 | 259 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 20, 2016 | June 28, 2004 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CWS
USA
99.79%
Other
0.21%
IMCG
USA
94.59%
Other
5.41%
Sectors
CWS
Industrials
29.33%
Healthcare
25.25%
Technology
12.24%
Business Services
9.29%
Other
23.89%
IMCG
Technology
25.16%
Industrials
22.22%
Finance
14.03%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.92%
Healthcare
7.36%
Other
23.32%
Advertisement
Diversification
CWS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
71.71%
IMCG
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
16.43%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
CWS
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
8.45%
IES Holdings, Inc.
7.38%
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
5.65%
Amphenol Corp.
4.97%
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
4.70%
Henry Schein, Inc.
4.49%
Science Applications International Corp.
4.49%
HEICO Corp.
4.31%
Mueller Industries, Inc.
4.25%
Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
4.20%
American Water Works Co., Inc.
4.09%
Stryker Corp.
3.79%
McKesson Corp.
3.69%
Moody's Corp.
3.68%
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
3.57%
IMCG
Cummins, Inc.
1.30%
Fortinet, Inc.
1.26%
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
1.20%
Johnson Controls International Plc
1.18%
Dell Technologies, Inc.
1.15%
Snowflake, Inc.
1.14%
Datadog, Inc.
1.08%
Bloom Energy Corp.
1.07%
Royal Caribbean Group
1.05%
Robinhood Markets, Inc.
1.03%
Cloudflare, Inc.
1.03%
O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.
1.01%
Teradyne, Inc.
1.00%
Hilton Worldwide Holdings, Inc.
0.97%
Coherent Corp.
0.96%
Frequently asked questions about CWS and IMCG
How have the CWS and IMCG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 31, 2026, CWS is up 3.82% year-to-date (YTD), while IMCG has returned 19.38%. That puts IMCG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CWS or IMCG?
Year-to-date, the CWS ETF saw -$52M in flows, compared to +$213M for IMCG.
Which ETF is more volatile: CWS or IMCG?
Over the past year, CWS had a volatility of 13.44%, while IMCG experienced 17.04%.
Which ETF is bigger: CWS or IMCG?
As of July 31, 2026, CWS holds $130.83 M in assets under management (AUM), while IMCG manages $3.92 B.
What sectors do the CWS and IMCG ETFs invest in?
CWS leans toward sectors like Industrials, Healthcare and Technology. Meanwhile, IMCG focuses on Technology, Industrials and Finance.
What are the top holdings of the CWS ETF and IMCG ETF?
CWS top holdings include Comfort Systems USA, Inc., IES Holdings, Inc. and Casey's General Stores, Inc.. IMCG holds in its top three: Cummins, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. and Freeport-McMoRan, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CWS or IMCG?
CWS holds 25 securities with 71.71% of its assets in the top 15. IMCG has 261 securities and a top 15 weight of 16.43%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
