CWSvsIMCBETF Comparison
VS
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB) is part of the US Mid Cap segment. CWS's top 3 sector exposures are Healthcare, Industrials and Technology. In contrast, IMCB's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Industrials. CWS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.04% for IMCB. CWS is down -0.69% year-to-date (YTD) with -$65M in YTD flows. IMCB performs better with 19.67% YTD performance, and +$88M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CWS and IMCB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CWS vs IMCB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 11/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CWS IMCB | +1.52%+2.39% | -4.72%+0.44% | -0.69%+19.67% | +1.55%+20.66% | +35.65%+75.21% | +39.61%+48.03% |
| Flows | CWS IMCB | -$8M+$34M | -$12M+$74M | -$65M+$88M | -$68M+$154M | +$9M+$470M | +$49M+$404M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CWS IMCB | +12.52%+10.61% | +13.51%+12.89% | +13.82%+14.96% | +15.85%+17.64% |
| Max drawdown | CWS IMCB | -9.63%-6.39% | -11.94%-8.06% | -16.20%-19.88% | -23.63%-25.13% |
| Max drawdown duration | CWS IMCB | 77d78d | 196d49d | 404d238d | 532d835d |
Trading data
CWS | IMCB | |
Last sale 11/2/2026 at 8:23 PM | $68.10 | $98.36 |
| Previous close 11/02/2026 | $67.04 | $98.01 |
| Consolidated volume 11/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CWS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCWS | IMCB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/2/2026 at 8:23 PM
Live
Closed
CWS | IMCB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $68.10 | $98.36 |
| 1D performance | +1.58% | +0.35% |
| AuM | $112.87 M | $1.75 B |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.04% |
Characteristics
CWS | IMCB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | AdvisorShares | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | Morningstar U.S. Mid Cap Index |
| N° of holdings | 25 | 390 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 20, 2016 | June 28, 2004 |
| ESG | No | No |
Exposure
Countries
CWS
USA
99.88%
Other
0.12%
IMCB
USA
95.58%
Other
4.42%
Sectors
CWS
Healthcare
28.08%
Industrials
27.18%
Technology
13.93%
Business Services
7.53%
Other
23.28%
IMCB
Finance
18.65%
Technology
16.42%
Industrials
15.54%
Healthcare
10.14%
Energy
7.34%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.21%
Other
24.7%
Diversification
CWS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
71.21%
IMCB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
11.08%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
CWS
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
7.50%
IES Holdings, Inc.
6.11%
Science Applications International Corp.
5.38%
Amphenol Corp.
5.23%
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
4.71%
McKesson Corp.
4.68%
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
4.66%
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
4.50%
Henry Schein, Inc.
4.50%
Mueller Industries, Inc.
4.22%
FactSet Research Systems, Inc.
4.04%
American Water Works Co., Inc.
3.99%
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
3.92%
Cencora, Inc.
3.90%
ResMed, Inc.
3.87%
IMCB
Dell Technologies, Inc.
1.09%
Snowflake, Inc.
0.81%
Cloudflare, Inc.
0.79%
Valero Energy Corp.
0.79%
Fortinet, Inc.
0.79%
Marathon Petroleum Corp.
0.79%
Automatic Data Processing, Inc.
0.73%
Phillips 66
0.72%
Freeport-McMoRan, Inc.
0.71%
The Bank of New York Mellon Corp.
0.69%
Datadog, Inc.
0.64%
Johnson Controls International Plc
0.64%
U.S. Bancorp
0.64%
The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
0.63%
Robinhood Markets, Inc.
0.62%
Frequently asked questions about CWS and IMCB
How have the CWS and IMCB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of November 2, 2026, CWS is down -0.69% year-to-date (YTD), while IMCB has returned 19.67%. That puts IMCB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CWS or IMCB?
Year-to-date, the CWS ETF saw -$65M in flows, compared to +$88M for IMCB.
Which ETF is more volatile: CWS or IMCB?
Over the past year, CWS had a volatility of 13.51%, while IMCB experienced 12.89%.
Which ETF is bigger: CWS or IMCB?
As of November 2, 2026, CWS holds $112.87 M in assets under management (AUM), while IMCB manages $1.75 B.
What sectors do the CWS and IMCB ETFs invest in?
CWS leans toward sectors like Healthcare, Industrials and Technology. Meanwhile, IMCB focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the CWS ETF and IMCB ETF?
CWS top holdings include Comfort Systems USA, Inc., IES Holdings, Inc. and Science Applications International Corp.. IMCB holds in its top three: Dell Technologies, Inc., Snowflake, Inc. and Cloudflare, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CWS or IMCB?
CWS holds 25 securities with 71.21% of its assets in the top 15. IMCB has 395 securities and a top 15 weight of 11.08%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
