CWSvsGSEWETF Comparison
VS
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF (GSEW) is part of the US Large Cap segment. CWS's top 3 sector exposures are Healthcare, Industrials and Technology. In contrast, GSEW's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. CWS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.09% for GSEW. CWS is down -0.69% year-to-date (YTD) with -$65M in YTD flows. GSEW performs better with 15.22% YTD performance, and +$448M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CWS and GSEW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CWS vs GSEW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 11/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CWS GSEW | +1.52%+3.03% | -4.72%+1.62% | -0.69%+15.22% | +1.55%+16.71% | +35.65%+72.29% | +39.61%+47.32% |
| Flows | CWS GSEW | -$8M+$95M | -$12M+$211M | -$65M+$448M | -$68M+$546M | +$9M+$1.24B | +$49M+$901M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CWS GSEW | +12.52%+10.40% | +13.51%+12.06% | +13.82%+14.19% | +15.85%+16.99% |
| Max drawdown | CWS GSEW | -9.63%-5.91% | -11.94%-7.73% | -16.20%-18.23% | -23.63%-25.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | CWS GSEW | 77d78d | 196d49d | 404d211d | 532d834d |
Trading data
CWS | GSEW | |
Last sale 11/2/2026 at 8:23 PM | $68.10 | $97.17 |
| Previous close 11/02/2026 | $67.04 | $97.07 |
| Consolidated volume 11/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CWS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexCWS | GSEW | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/2/2026 at 8:23 PM
Live
Closed
CWS | GSEW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $68.10 | $97.17 |
| 1D performance | +1.58% | +0.10% |
| AuM | $112.87 M | $2.18 B |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.09% |
Characteristics
CWS | GSEW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | AdvisorShares | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive US Large Cap Equal Weight Index |
| N° of holdings | 25 | 492 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 20, 2016 | December 11, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CWS
USA
99.88%
Other
0.12%
GSEW
USA
94.11%
Other
5.89%
Sectors
CWS
Healthcare
28.08%
Industrials
27.18%
Technology
13.93%
Business Services
7.53%
Other
23.28%
GSEW
Technology
19.55%
Finance
18.95%
Industrials
14.55%
Healthcare
11.61%
Other
35.34%
Advertisement
Diversification
CWS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
71.21%
GSEW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
4.02%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
CWS
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
7.50%
IES Holdings, Inc.
6.11%
Science Applications International Corp.
5.38%
Amphenol Corp.
5.23%
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
4.71%
McKesson Corp.
4.68%
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
4.66%
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
4.50%
Henry Schein, Inc.
4.50%
Mueller Industries, Inc.
4.22%
FactSet Research Systems, Inc.
4.04%
American Water Works Co., Inc.
3.99%
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
3.92%
Cencora, Inc.
3.90%
ResMed, Inc.
3.87%
GSEW
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
0.28%
Bloom Energy Corp.
0.28%
Intel Corp.
0.28%
Everpure, Inc.
0.28%
Astera Labs, Inc.
0.27%
Moderna, Inc.
0.27%
Strategy, Inc.
0.27%
Cloudflare, Inc.
0.26%
Natera, Inc.
0.26%
Illumina, Inc.
0.26%
Datadog, Inc.
0.26%
Marvell Technology, Inc.
0.26%
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd.
0.26%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.26%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.
0.26%
Frequently asked questions about CWS and GSEW
How have the CWS and GSEW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of November 2, 2026, CWS is down -0.69% year-to-date (YTD), while GSEW has returned 15.22%. That puts GSEW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CWS or GSEW?
Year-to-date, the CWS ETF saw -$65M in flows, compared to +$448M for GSEW.
Which ETF is more volatile: CWS or GSEW?
Over the past year, CWS had a volatility of 13.51%, while GSEW experienced 12.06%.
Which ETF is bigger: CWS or GSEW?
As of November 2, 2026, CWS holds $112.87 M in assets under management (AUM), while GSEW manages $2.18 B.
What sectors do the CWS and GSEW ETFs invest in?
CWS leans toward sectors like Healthcare, Industrials and Technology. Meanwhile, GSEW focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the CWS ETF and GSEW ETF?
CWS top holdings include Comfort Systems USA, Inc., IES Holdings, Inc. and Science Applications International Corp.. GSEW holds in its top three: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., Bloom Energy Corp. and Intel Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: CWS or GSEW?
CWS holds 25 securities with 71.21% of its assets in the top 15. GSEW has 492 securities and a top 15 weight of 4.02%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
