CWSvsGLRYETF Comparison
VS
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) and Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. CWS's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Healthcare and Technology. In contrast, GLRY's top sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Finance. CWS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.87% for GLRY. CWS is up 3.82% year-to-date (YTD) with -$52M in YTD flows. GLRY performs better with 15.46% YTD performance, and +$31M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CWS and GLRY below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CWS vs GLRY performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/31/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CWS GLRY | +4.59%-3.68% | +4.75%+0.18% | +3.82%+15.46% | +3.80%+24.07% | +29.81%+58.31% | +49.90%+51.10% |
| Flows | CWS GLRY | -$7M+$6M | -$29M+$9M | -$52M+$31M | -$62M+$66M | +$24M+$76M | +$62M+$86M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CWS GLRY | +11.07%+24.43% | +13.44%+20.56% | +13.92%+18.70% | +15.83%+20.28% |
| Max drawdown | CWS GLRY | -2.43%-9.64% | -11.94%-10.85% | -16.20%-20.66% | -23.63%-34.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | CWS GLRY | 18d31d | 193d44d | 404d209d | 532d917d |
Trading data
CWS | GLRY | |
Last sale 8/3/2026 at 1:30 PM | $71.60 | $41.51 |
| Previous close 07/31/2026 | $71.44 | $41.26 |
| Consolidated volume 07/31/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/3/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CWS | GLRY | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $71.60 | $41.51 |
| 1D performance | +0.23% | +0.61% |
| AuM | $130.83 M | $167.69 M |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.87% |
Characteristics
CWS | GLRY | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | AdvisorShares | Inspire ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 25 | 33 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 20, 2016 | August 12, 2020 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CWS
USA
99.79%
Other
0.21%
GLRY
USA
99.95%
Other
0.05%
Sectors
CWS
Industrials
29.33%
Healthcare
25.25%
Technology
12.24%
Business Services
9.29%
Other
23.89%
GLRY
Technology
34.31%
Industrials
19.46%
Finance
15.41%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.87%
Healthcare
7.63%
Other
13.33%
Advertisement
Diversification
CWS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
71.71%
GLRY
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
64.05%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
CWS
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
8.45%
IES Holdings, Inc.
7.38%
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
5.65%
Amphenol Corp.
4.97%
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
4.70%
Henry Schein, Inc.
4.49%
Science Applications International Corp.
4.49%
HEICO Corp.
4.31%
Mueller Industries, Inc.
4.25%
Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
4.20%
American Water Works Co., Inc.
4.09%
Stryker Corp.
3.79%
McKesson Corp.
3.69%
Moody's Corp.
3.68%
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
3.57%
GLRY
KLA Corp.
8.84%
Amphenol Corp.
5.23%
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
4.79%
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
4.68%
ACM Research, Inc.
4.66%
EMCOR Group, Inc.
4.48%
Broadcom Inc.
4.46%
BWX Technologies, Inc.
3.90%
Applovin Corp.
3.77%
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
3.71%
United Therapeutics Corp.
3.52%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
3.27%
NRG Energy, Inc.
3.05%
Flowserve Corp.
3.02%
Photronics, Inc.
2.66%
Frequently asked questions about CWS and GLRY
How have the CWS and GLRY ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 31, 2026, CWS is up 3.82% year-to-date (YTD), while GLRY has returned 15.46%. That puts GLRY better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CWS or GLRY?
Year-to-date, the CWS ETF saw -$52M in flows, compared to +$31M for GLRY.
Which ETF is more volatile: CWS or GLRY?
Over the past year, CWS had a volatility of 13.44%, while GLRY experienced 20.56%.
Which ETF is bigger: CWS or GLRY?
As of July 31, 2026, CWS holds $130.83 M in assets under management (AUM), while GLRY manages $167.69 M.
What sectors do the CWS and GLRY ETFs invest in?
CWS leans toward sectors like Industrials, Healthcare and Technology. Meanwhile, GLRY focuses on Technology, Industrials and Finance.
What are the top holdings of the CWS ETF and GLRY ETF?
CWS top holdings include Comfort Systems USA, Inc., IES Holdings, Inc. and Casey's General Stores, Inc.. GLRY holds in its top three: KLA Corp., Amphenol Corp. and Curtiss-Wright Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: CWS or GLRY?
CWS holds 25 securities with 71.71% of its assets in the top 15. GLRY has 33 securities and a top 15 weight of 64.05%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
