CWSvsGLRYETF Comparison
VS
AdvisorShares Focused Equity ETF (CWS) and Inspire Faithward Mid Cap Momentum ESG ETF (GLRY) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. CWS's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Healthcare and Technology. In contrast, GLRY's top sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Finance. CWS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.87% for GLRY. CWS is down -0.64% year-to-date (YTD) with -$53M in YTD flows. GLRY performs better with 4.68% YTD performance, and +$38M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of CWS and GLRY below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
CWS vs GLRY performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CWS GLRY | -7.15%-10.61% | -0.73%-11.39% | -0.64%+4.68% | -0.00%+2.81% | +28.21%+46.88% | +44.62%+31.70% |
| Flows | CWS GLRY | -$367K+$3M | -$10M+$17M | -$53M+$38M | -$64M+$65M | +$23M+$84M | +$61M+$92M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | CWS GLRY | +12.55%+21.27% | +13.62%+20.93% | +13.99%+18.88% | +15.87%+20.29% |
| Max drawdown | CWS GLRY | -7.15%-14.56% | -11.94%-14.56% | -16.20%-20.66% | -23.63%-34.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | CWS GLRY | 30d78d | 196d78d | 404d209d | 532d917d |
Trading data
CWS | GLRY | |
Last sale 9/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $67.98 | $37.50 |
| Previous close 09/17/2026 | $68.26 | $37.32 |
| Consolidated volume 09/17/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
CWS | GLRY | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $67.98 | $37.50 |
| 1D performance | -0.41% | +0.47% |
| AuM | $124.52 M | $158.57 M |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.87% |
Characteristics
CWS | GLRY | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | AdvisorShares | Inspire ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 25 | 33 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 20, 2016 | August 12, 2020 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
CWS
USA
99.89%
Other
0.11%
GLRY
USA
99.91%
Other
0.09%
Sectors
CWS
Industrials
27.54%
Healthcare
26.09%
Technology
12.69%
Business Services
8.67%
Other
25.01%
GLRY
Technology
29.5%
Industrials
19.31%
Finance
17.03%
Consumer Cyclical.
11.59%
Healthcare
8.08%
Other
14.49%
Advertisement
Diversification
CWS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
70.39%
GLRY
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
59.92%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
CWS
IES Holdings, Inc.
7.26%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
7.18%
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
6.03%
Amphenol Corp.
4.58%
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
4.46%
Science Applications International Corp.
4.45%
Mueller Industries, Inc.
4.39%
Henry Schein, Inc.
4.37%
Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
4.27%
HEICO Corp.
4.19%
McKesson Corp.
4.05%
American Water Works Co., Inc.
3.95%
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
3.87%
Moody's Corp.
3.71%
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
3.63%
GLRY
KLA Corp.
5.68%
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
5.13%
Amphenol Corp.
5.06%
Broadcom Inc.
4.88%
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
4.85%
EMCOR Group, Inc.
4.57%
Casey's General Stores, Inc.
4.32%
BWX Technologies, Inc.
3.59%
United Therapeutics Corp.
3.57%
Flowserve Corp.
3.28%
Applovin Corp.
3.08%
ACM Research, Inc.
3.06%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
3.02%
NRG Energy, Inc.
2.97%
AutoNation, Inc.
2.87%
Frequently asked questions about CWS and GLRY
How have the CWS and GLRY ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 16, 2026, CWS is down -0.64% year-to-date (YTD), while GLRY has returned 4.68%. That puts GLRY better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: CWS or GLRY?
Year-to-date, the CWS ETF saw -$53M in flows, compared to +$38M for GLRY.
Which ETF is more volatile: CWS or GLRY?
Over the past year, CWS had a volatility of 13.62%, while GLRY experienced 20.93%.
Which ETF is bigger: CWS or GLRY?
As of September 16, 2026, CWS holds $124.52 M in assets under management (AUM), while GLRY manages $158.57 M.
What sectors do the CWS and GLRY ETFs invest in?
CWS leans toward sectors like Industrials, Healthcare and Technology. Meanwhile, GLRY focuses on Technology, Industrials and Finance.
What are the top holdings of the CWS ETF and GLRY ETF?
CWS top holdings include IES Holdings, Inc., Comfort Systems USA, Inc. and Casey's General Stores, Inc.. GLRY holds in its top three: KLA Corp., Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. and Amphenol Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: CWS or GLRY?
CWS holds 25 securities with 70.39% of its assets in the top 15. GLRY has 33 securities and a top 15 weight of 59.92%.
Advertisement
Advertisement
